School Size and the Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Student Achievement:Confronting the Threat of Size Bias in National Data Sets

Most of the recent literature on the achievement effects of school size has examined school and district performance. These studies have demonstrated substantial benefits of smaller school and district size in impoverished settings. To date, however, no work has adequately examined the relationship...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Craig B. Howley, Aimee A. Howley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Arizona State University 2004-09-01
Series:Education Policy Analysis Archives
Online Access:http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/207
_version_ 1811317036995837952
author Craig B. Howley
Aimee A. Howley
author_facet Craig B. Howley
Aimee A. Howley
author_sort Craig B. Howley
collection DOAJ
description Most of the recent literature on the achievement effects of school size has examined school and district performance. These studies have demonstrated substantial benefits of smaller school and district size in impoverished settings. To date, however, no work has adequately examined the relationship of size and socioeconomic status (SES) with students as the unit of analysis. One study, however, came close (Lee & Smith, 1997), but failed to adjust its analyses or conclusions to the substantial bias toward larger schools evident in the data set used. The present study, based on the same large data set, but with size issues in the rural circumstance clearly in focus, reaches rather different conclusions, extending previous work for the first time to a more adequate examination of size effects on individual students. Findings challenge assertions about ideal and minimum size. Analyses include comparison of means and multi-level modeling. Methodologically, the study illustrates the challenge of using nationally representative data sets of students to investigate second-level contextual phenomena, such as school size. When aggregated to schools attended by nationally representative students, the result cannot be a nationally representative set of schools. Adjustment with weights to simulate such a distribution, moreover, is inadequate to overcome this threat if one is interested in investigating size relationships among the smaller half of US schools, as one must be in seeking to generalize results to the nation as a whole. The present study finds that the smallest national decile of size maximizes the achievement of the poorest quartile of students. Moreover, appropriate size is shown to vary by student socioeconomic status.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T11:59:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd99578e419e48eebdba2a25407c2e99
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1068-2341
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T11:59:49Z
publishDate 2004-09-01
publisher Arizona State University
record_format Article
series Education Policy Analysis Archives
spelling doaj.art-dd99578e419e48eebdba2a25407c2e992022-12-22T02:47:49ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412004-09-011252School Size and the Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Student Achievement:Confronting the Threat of Size Bias in National Data SetsCraig B. HowleyAimee A. HowleyMost of the recent literature on the achievement effects of school size has examined school and district performance. These studies have demonstrated substantial benefits of smaller school and district size in impoverished settings. To date, however, no work has adequately examined the relationship of size and socioeconomic status (SES) with students as the unit of analysis. One study, however, came close (Lee & Smith, 1997), but failed to adjust its analyses or conclusions to the substantial bias toward larger schools evident in the data set used. The present study, based on the same large data set, but with size issues in the rural circumstance clearly in focus, reaches rather different conclusions, extending previous work for the first time to a more adequate examination of size effects on individual students. Findings challenge assertions about ideal and minimum size. Analyses include comparison of means and multi-level modeling. Methodologically, the study illustrates the challenge of using nationally representative data sets of students to investigate second-level contextual phenomena, such as school size. When aggregated to schools attended by nationally representative students, the result cannot be a nationally representative set of schools. Adjustment with weights to simulate such a distribution, moreover, is inadequate to overcome this threat if one is interested in investigating size relationships among the smaller half of US schools, as one must be in seeking to generalize results to the nation as a whole. The present study finds that the smallest national decile of size maximizes the achievement of the poorest quartile of students. Moreover, appropriate size is shown to vary by student socioeconomic status.http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/207
spellingShingle Craig B. Howley
Aimee A. Howley
School Size and the Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Student Achievement:Confronting the Threat of Size Bias in National Data Sets
Education Policy Analysis Archives
title School Size and the Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Student Achievement:Confronting the Threat of Size Bias in National Data Sets
title_full School Size and the Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Student Achievement:Confronting the Threat of Size Bias in National Data Sets
title_fullStr School Size and the Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Student Achievement:Confronting the Threat of Size Bias in National Data Sets
title_full_unstemmed School Size and the Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Student Achievement:Confronting the Threat of Size Bias in National Data Sets
title_short School Size and the Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Student Achievement:Confronting the Threat of Size Bias in National Data Sets
title_sort school size and the influence of socioeconomic status on student achievement confronting the threat of size bias in national data sets
url http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/207
work_keys_str_mv AT craigbhowley schoolsizeandtheinfluenceofsocioeconomicstatusonstudentachievementconfrontingthethreatofsizebiasinnationaldatasets
AT aimeeahowley schoolsizeandtheinfluenceofsocioeconomicstatusonstudentachievementconfrontingthethreatofsizebiasinnationaldatasets