Socioeconomic Inequalities in Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND:Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) are generally assumed to be concentrated in poor populations, but evidence on this remains scattered. We describe within-country socioeconomic inequalities in nine NTDs listed in the London Declaration for intensified control and/or elimination: lymphati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tanja A J Houweling, Henrike E Karim-Kos, Margarete C Kulik, Wilma A Stolk, Juanita A Haagsma, Edeltraud J Lenk, Jan Hendrik Richardus, Sake J de Vlas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-05-01
Series:PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4865383?pdf=render
_version_ 1818311212474040320
author Tanja A J Houweling
Henrike E Karim-Kos
Margarete C Kulik
Wilma A Stolk
Juanita A Haagsma
Edeltraud J Lenk
Jan Hendrik Richardus
Sake J de Vlas
author_facet Tanja A J Houweling
Henrike E Karim-Kos
Margarete C Kulik
Wilma A Stolk
Juanita A Haagsma
Edeltraud J Lenk
Jan Hendrik Richardus
Sake J de Vlas
author_sort Tanja A J Houweling
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND:Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) are generally assumed to be concentrated in poor populations, but evidence on this remains scattered. We describe within-country socioeconomic inequalities in nine NTDs listed in the London Declaration for intensified control and/or elimination: lymphatic filariasis (LF), onchocerciasis, schistosomiasis, soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH), trachoma, Chagas' disease, human African trypanosomiasis (HAT), leprosy, and visceral leishmaniasis (VL). METHODOLOGY:We conducted a systematic literature review, including publications between 2004-2013 found in Embase, Medline (OvidSP), Cochrane Central, Web of Science, Popline, Lilacs, and Scielo. We included publications in international peer-reviewed journals on studies concerning the top 20 countries in terms of the burden of the NTD under study. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:We identified 5,516 publications, of which 93 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 59 papers reported substantial and statistically significant socioeconomic inequalities in NTD distribution, with higher odds of infection or disease among poor and less-educated people compared with better-off groups. The findings were mixed in 23 studies, and 11 studies showed no substantial or statistically significant inequality. Most information was available for STH, VL, schistosomiasis, and, to a lesser extent, for trachoma. For the other NTDs, evidence on their socioeconomic distribution was scarce. The magnitude of inequality varied, but often, the odds of infection or disease were twice as high among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups compared with better-off strata. Inequalities often took the form of a gradient, with higher odds of infection or disease each step down the socioeconomic hierarchy. Notwithstanding these inequalities, the prevalence of some NTDs was sometimes also high among better-off groups in some highly endemic areas. CONCLUSIONS:While recent evidence on socioeconomic inequalities is scarce for most individual NTDs, for some, there is considerable evidence of substantially higher odds of infection or disease among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. NTD control activities as proposed in the London Declaration, when set up in a way that they reach the most in need, will benefit the poorest populations in poor countries.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T07:58:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dd9cd6472e6f49c9a5fc9927511f6ced
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1935-2727
1935-2735
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T07:58:22Z
publishDate 2016-05-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
spelling doaj.art-dd9cd6472e6f49c9a5fc9927511f6ced2022-12-21T23:54:30ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases1935-27271935-27352016-05-01105e000454610.1371/journal.pntd.0004546Socioeconomic Inequalities in Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Systematic Review.Tanja A J HouwelingHenrike E Karim-KosMargarete C KulikWilma A StolkJuanita A HaagsmaEdeltraud J LenkJan Hendrik RichardusSake J de VlasBACKGROUND:Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) are generally assumed to be concentrated in poor populations, but evidence on this remains scattered. We describe within-country socioeconomic inequalities in nine NTDs listed in the London Declaration for intensified control and/or elimination: lymphatic filariasis (LF), onchocerciasis, schistosomiasis, soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH), trachoma, Chagas' disease, human African trypanosomiasis (HAT), leprosy, and visceral leishmaniasis (VL). METHODOLOGY:We conducted a systematic literature review, including publications between 2004-2013 found in Embase, Medline (OvidSP), Cochrane Central, Web of Science, Popline, Lilacs, and Scielo. We included publications in international peer-reviewed journals on studies concerning the top 20 countries in terms of the burden of the NTD under study. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:We identified 5,516 publications, of which 93 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 59 papers reported substantial and statistically significant socioeconomic inequalities in NTD distribution, with higher odds of infection or disease among poor and less-educated people compared with better-off groups. The findings were mixed in 23 studies, and 11 studies showed no substantial or statistically significant inequality. Most information was available for STH, VL, schistosomiasis, and, to a lesser extent, for trachoma. For the other NTDs, evidence on their socioeconomic distribution was scarce. The magnitude of inequality varied, but often, the odds of infection or disease were twice as high among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups compared with better-off strata. Inequalities often took the form of a gradient, with higher odds of infection or disease each step down the socioeconomic hierarchy. Notwithstanding these inequalities, the prevalence of some NTDs was sometimes also high among better-off groups in some highly endemic areas. CONCLUSIONS:While recent evidence on socioeconomic inequalities is scarce for most individual NTDs, for some, there is considerable evidence of substantially higher odds of infection or disease among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. NTD control activities as proposed in the London Declaration, when set up in a way that they reach the most in need, will benefit the poorest populations in poor countries.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4865383?pdf=render
spellingShingle Tanja A J Houweling
Henrike E Karim-Kos
Margarete C Kulik
Wilma A Stolk
Juanita A Haagsma
Edeltraud J Lenk
Jan Hendrik Richardus
Sake J de Vlas
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Systematic Review.
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
title Socioeconomic Inequalities in Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Systematic Review.
title_full Socioeconomic Inequalities in Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Systematic Review.
title_fullStr Socioeconomic Inequalities in Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Systematic Review.
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic Inequalities in Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Systematic Review.
title_short Socioeconomic Inequalities in Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Systematic Review.
title_sort socioeconomic inequalities in neglected tropical diseases a systematic review
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4865383?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT tanjaajhouweling socioeconomicinequalitiesinneglectedtropicaldiseasesasystematicreview
AT henrikeekarimkos socioeconomicinequalitiesinneglectedtropicaldiseasesasystematicreview
AT margareteckulik socioeconomicinequalitiesinneglectedtropicaldiseasesasystematicreview
AT wilmaastolk socioeconomicinequalitiesinneglectedtropicaldiseasesasystematicreview
AT juanitaahaagsma socioeconomicinequalitiesinneglectedtropicaldiseasesasystematicreview
AT edeltraudjlenk socioeconomicinequalitiesinneglectedtropicaldiseasesasystematicreview
AT janhendrikrichardus socioeconomicinequalitiesinneglectedtropicaldiseasesasystematicreview
AT sakejdevlas socioeconomicinequalitiesinneglectedtropicaldiseasesasystematicreview