Cost-benefit analysis of sustainable land and water management practices in selected highland water catchments of Kenya

Sustainable land management (SLM) strives to maintain and improve the agricultural production capacity of land. To achieve the goals of SLM, communities use various types of agronomic, vegetative, and structural practices. Despite the benefits of SLM practices, some farmers are reluctant to adopt th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mwamburi Mcharo, Marianne Maghenda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-07-01
Series:Scientific African
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227621000831
_version_ 1829514091472879616
author Mwamburi Mcharo
Marianne Maghenda
author_facet Mwamburi Mcharo
Marianne Maghenda
author_sort Mwamburi Mcharo
collection DOAJ
description Sustainable land management (SLM) strives to maintain and improve the agricultural production capacity of land. To achieve the goals of SLM, communities use various types of agronomic, vegetative, and structural practices. Despite the benefits of SLM practices, some farmers are reluctant to adopt them. An economic cost-benefit analysis of SLM practices is an important approach to demonstrate the benefits of appropriate SLM practices. This study was conducted to determine the effect of adopting of SLM practices, and also the costs and benefits associated with adopting SLM practices in Kinale-Kikuyu, Cherangani, and Wundanyi water catchments in Kenya. A multistage, probability proportional to size sampling method was used to select 388 households for a cross-sectional survey in the year 2015. The study used the World Overview of Conservation Agriculture Technologies survey tools in a mixed-methods research technique. Profitability analysis, return on investment, and sensitivity analyses were conducted. Terraces, infiltration ditches, and trash lines were popular practices adopted by farmers. The cost of establishing terraces on a hectare of land was US$ 445. The most expensive vegetative SLM practice, woodlot, costed US$ 534 per hectare to establish. Average yields increased by 49.8% in Kinale-Kikuyu, 60.6% in Cherangani, and 107.5% in Wundanyi due to adoption of SLM practices. Yield increases of 8.7% in fodder maize and 108% in tomatoes and potatoes were observed. The percentage increase in mean annual gross margins due to adopting SLM practices was highest in Wundanyi at 242.09%. Cost-benefit analysis showed that Kinale-Kikuyu had the highest Net Present Value of US$ 4083.73 due to adopting SLM. Positive Net Present Values were an indicator of the benefits of SLM in all the catchments. Benefits accruing from the adoption of SLM practices by the farmers exceeded the costs of establishing the SLM structures in the long run. It is recommended that a pilot Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) project be established on hilly catchments and for linkages to be made between markets for produce and farmers willing to adopt SLM practices as an incentive to adopt them.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T13:11:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ddae136819dd4900b267a35cb5bbcb34
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2468-2276
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T13:11:52Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Scientific African
spelling doaj.art-ddae136819dd4900b267a35cb5bbcb342022-12-21T22:30:36ZengElsevierScientific African2468-22762021-07-0112e00779Cost-benefit analysis of sustainable land and water management practices in selected highland water catchments of KenyaMwamburi Mcharo0Marianne Maghenda1P.O. Box 38561-00623, Nairobi, Kenya; Taita Taveta University, School of Agriculture, Earth and Environmental Sciences, P. O. Box 635 – 80300, Voi, Kenya; Corresponding author at: Taita Taveta University, School of Agriculture, Earth and Environmental Sciences, P. O. Box 635-80300, Voi, Kenya.Taita Taveta University, School of Agriculture, Earth and Environmental Sciences, P. O. Box 635 – 80300, Voi, KenyaSustainable land management (SLM) strives to maintain and improve the agricultural production capacity of land. To achieve the goals of SLM, communities use various types of agronomic, vegetative, and structural practices. Despite the benefits of SLM practices, some farmers are reluctant to adopt them. An economic cost-benefit analysis of SLM practices is an important approach to demonstrate the benefits of appropriate SLM practices. This study was conducted to determine the effect of adopting of SLM practices, and also the costs and benefits associated with adopting SLM practices in Kinale-Kikuyu, Cherangani, and Wundanyi water catchments in Kenya. A multistage, probability proportional to size sampling method was used to select 388 households for a cross-sectional survey in the year 2015. The study used the World Overview of Conservation Agriculture Technologies survey tools in a mixed-methods research technique. Profitability analysis, return on investment, and sensitivity analyses were conducted. Terraces, infiltration ditches, and trash lines were popular practices adopted by farmers. The cost of establishing terraces on a hectare of land was US$ 445. The most expensive vegetative SLM practice, woodlot, costed US$ 534 per hectare to establish. Average yields increased by 49.8% in Kinale-Kikuyu, 60.6% in Cherangani, and 107.5% in Wundanyi due to adoption of SLM practices. Yield increases of 8.7% in fodder maize and 108% in tomatoes and potatoes were observed. The percentage increase in mean annual gross margins due to adopting SLM practices was highest in Wundanyi at 242.09%. Cost-benefit analysis showed that Kinale-Kikuyu had the highest Net Present Value of US$ 4083.73 due to adopting SLM. Positive Net Present Values were an indicator of the benefits of SLM in all the catchments. Benefits accruing from the adoption of SLM practices by the farmers exceeded the costs of establishing the SLM structures in the long run. It is recommended that a pilot Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) project be established on hilly catchments and for linkages to be made between markets for produce and farmers willing to adopt SLM practices as an incentive to adopt them.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227621000831SustainableLandWaterManagementCatchmentCost
spellingShingle Mwamburi Mcharo
Marianne Maghenda
Cost-benefit analysis of sustainable land and water management practices in selected highland water catchments of Kenya
Scientific African
Sustainable
Land
Water
Management
Catchment
Cost
title Cost-benefit analysis of sustainable land and water management practices in selected highland water catchments of Kenya
title_full Cost-benefit analysis of sustainable land and water management practices in selected highland water catchments of Kenya
title_fullStr Cost-benefit analysis of sustainable land and water management practices in selected highland water catchments of Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Cost-benefit analysis of sustainable land and water management practices in selected highland water catchments of Kenya
title_short Cost-benefit analysis of sustainable land and water management practices in selected highland water catchments of Kenya
title_sort cost benefit analysis of sustainable land and water management practices in selected highland water catchments of kenya
topic Sustainable
Land
Water
Management
Catchment
Cost
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227621000831
work_keys_str_mv AT mwamburimcharo costbenefitanalysisofsustainablelandandwatermanagementpracticesinselectedhighlandwatercatchmentsofkenya
AT mariannemaghenda costbenefitanalysisofsustainablelandandwatermanagementpracticesinselectedhighlandwatercatchmentsofkenya