Comparative effectiveness of spirapril and enalapril in patients with coronary heart disease-caused chronic heart failure

Aim. During prospective 6-month follow-up, to compare spirapril and enalapril effectiveness in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD)-caused chronic heart failure (CHF). Material and methods. In total, 61 patients with CHD-caused CHF, according to inclusion/exclusion criteria, were divided into...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S, Yu. Volkova, V. V. Ragozina, V. A. Balina, M. A. Pushnikova, V. A. Shchupletsova, S. V. Shalaev
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: «SILICEA-POLIGRAF» LLC 2006-08-01
Series:Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cardiovascular.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1242
Description
Summary:Aim. During prospective 6-month follow-up, to compare spirapril and enalapril effectiveness in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD)-caused chronic heart failure (CHF). Material and methods. In total, 61 patients with CHD-caused CHF, according to inclusion/exclusion criteria, were divided into spirapril group (n=29; mean dose 5±1.3 mg/d) and enalapril group (n=32, mean dose 18.3±9.0 mg/ d). At baseline and after 6-month follow-up, all patients underwent general clinical examination, 6-minute walking test, echocardiography (EchoCG), and quantitative measurement of plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level. Data analysis was performed with STATISTICA package (Version 6.0). Results. Both agents had similar clinical effects: during follow-up, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased by 9.6% in spirapril group (р=0.00013), and by 7.0% in enalapril group (р=0.01). In 6-minute walking test, the distance walked increased by 25.1% (р=0.00016) and 14.8% (р=0.01), respectively. NT-proBNP levels significantly correlated with patients’ functional status, assessed in 6-minute walking test (r=-0.43, p=0.002), and EchoCG-assessed LF systolic dysfunction (r=-0.46, p=0.001). In both groups, NT-proBNP levels had raised: non-significantly, up to 25 pmol/l (р=0.66) in spirapril group, and significantly, up to 150 pmol/l (р=0.045), in enalapril group. Conclusion. In patients with CHD-caused CHF, spirapril was as clinically effective as a traditionally administered ACE inhibitor. Spirapril was more effective in delaying NT-proBNP level increase.
ISSN:1728-8800
2619-0125