Comparative effectiveness of spirapril and enalapril in patients with coronary heart disease-caused chronic heart failure

Aim. During prospective 6-month follow-up, to compare spirapril and enalapril effectiveness in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD)-caused chronic heart failure (CHF). Material and methods. In total, 61 patients with CHD-caused CHF, according to inclusion/exclusion criteria, were divided into...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S, Yu. Volkova, V. V. Ragozina, V. A. Balina, M. A. Pushnikova, V. A. Shchupletsova, S. V. Shalaev
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: «SILICEA-POLIGRAF» LLC 2006-08-01
Series:Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cardiovascular.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1242
_version_ 1797882770125488128
author S, Yu. Volkova
V. V. Ragozina
V. A. Balina
M. A. Pushnikova
V. A. Shchupletsova
S. V. Shalaev
author_facet S, Yu. Volkova
V. V. Ragozina
V. A. Balina
M. A. Pushnikova
V. A. Shchupletsova
S. V. Shalaev
author_sort S, Yu. Volkova
collection DOAJ
description Aim. During prospective 6-month follow-up, to compare spirapril and enalapril effectiveness in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD)-caused chronic heart failure (CHF). Material and methods. In total, 61 patients with CHD-caused CHF, according to inclusion/exclusion criteria, were divided into spirapril group (n=29; mean dose 5±1.3 mg/d) and enalapril group (n=32, mean dose 18.3±9.0 mg/ d). At baseline and after 6-month follow-up, all patients underwent general clinical examination, 6-minute walking test, echocardiography (EchoCG), and quantitative measurement of plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level. Data analysis was performed with STATISTICA package (Version 6.0). Results. Both agents had similar clinical effects: during follow-up, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased by 9.6% in spirapril group (р=0.00013), and by 7.0% in enalapril group (р=0.01). In 6-minute walking test, the distance walked increased by 25.1% (р=0.00016) and 14.8% (р=0.01), respectively. NT-proBNP levels significantly correlated with patients’ functional status, assessed in 6-minute walking test (r=-0.43, p=0.002), and EchoCG-assessed LF systolic dysfunction (r=-0.46, p=0.001). In both groups, NT-proBNP levels had raised: non-significantly, up to 25 pmol/l (р=0.66) in spirapril group, and significantly, up to 150 pmol/l (р=0.045), in enalapril group. Conclusion. In patients with CHD-caused CHF, spirapril was as clinically effective as a traditionally administered ACE inhibitor. Spirapril was more effective in delaying NT-proBNP level increase.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T03:41:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ddbf62e39f34478fb3c858dcf0c14347
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1728-8800
2619-0125
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-04-10T03:41:02Z
publishDate 2006-08-01
publisher «SILICEA-POLIGRAF» LLC
record_format Article
series Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика
spelling doaj.art-ddbf62e39f34478fb3c858dcf0c143472023-03-13T07:23:12Zrus«SILICEA-POLIGRAF» LLCКардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика1728-88002619-01252006-08-01547581953Comparative effectiveness of spirapril and enalapril in patients with coronary heart disease-caused chronic heart failureS, Yu. Volkova0V. V. Ragozina1V. A. Balina2M. A. Pushnikova3V. A. Shchupletsova4S. V. Shalaev5Институт терапии Тюменского Отдела Южно-Уральского научного центра РАМН; Тюменская государственная медицинская академия. ТюменьОбластной кардиологический диспансерОбластной кардиологический диспансерТюменская государственная медицинская академия. ТюменьТюменская государственная медицинская академия. ТюменьОбластной кардиологический диспансер; Тюменская государственная медицинская академия. ТюменьAim. During prospective 6-month follow-up, to compare spirapril and enalapril effectiveness in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD)-caused chronic heart failure (CHF). Material and methods. In total, 61 patients with CHD-caused CHF, according to inclusion/exclusion criteria, were divided into spirapril group (n=29; mean dose 5±1.3 mg/d) and enalapril group (n=32, mean dose 18.3±9.0 mg/ d). At baseline and after 6-month follow-up, all patients underwent general clinical examination, 6-minute walking test, echocardiography (EchoCG), and quantitative measurement of plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level. Data analysis was performed with STATISTICA package (Version 6.0). Results. Both agents had similar clinical effects: during follow-up, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased by 9.6% in spirapril group (р=0.00013), and by 7.0% in enalapril group (р=0.01). In 6-minute walking test, the distance walked increased by 25.1% (р=0.00016) and 14.8% (р=0.01), respectively. NT-proBNP levels significantly correlated with patients’ functional status, assessed in 6-minute walking test (r=-0.43, p=0.002), and EchoCG-assessed LF systolic dysfunction (r=-0.46, p=0.001). In both groups, NT-proBNP levels had raised: non-significantly, up to 25 pmol/l (р=0.66) in spirapril group, and significantly, up to 150 pmol/l (р=0.045), in enalapril group. Conclusion. In patients with CHD-caused CHF, spirapril was as clinically effective as a traditionally administered ACE inhibitor. Spirapril was more effective in delaying NT-proBNP level increase.https://cardiovascular.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1242хроническая сердечная недостаточностьсравнение иапфспираприлэнлаприлnt-probnp
spellingShingle S, Yu. Volkova
V. V. Ragozina
V. A. Balina
M. A. Pushnikova
V. A. Shchupletsova
S. V. Shalaev
Comparative effectiveness of spirapril and enalapril in patients with coronary heart disease-caused chronic heart failure
Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика
хроническая сердечная недостаточность
сравнение иапф
спираприл
энлаприл
nt-probnp
title Comparative effectiveness of spirapril and enalapril in patients with coronary heart disease-caused chronic heart failure
title_full Comparative effectiveness of spirapril and enalapril in patients with coronary heart disease-caused chronic heart failure
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness of spirapril and enalapril in patients with coronary heart disease-caused chronic heart failure
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness of spirapril and enalapril in patients with coronary heart disease-caused chronic heart failure
title_short Comparative effectiveness of spirapril and enalapril in patients with coronary heart disease-caused chronic heart failure
title_sort comparative effectiveness of spirapril and enalapril in patients with coronary heart disease caused chronic heart failure
topic хроническая сердечная недостаточность
сравнение иапф
спираприл
энлаприл
nt-probnp
url https://cardiovascular.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1242
work_keys_str_mv AT syuvolkova comparativeeffectivenessofspiraprilandenalaprilinpatientswithcoronaryheartdiseasecausedchronicheartfailure
AT vvragozina comparativeeffectivenessofspiraprilandenalaprilinpatientswithcoronaryheartdiseasecausedchronicheartfailure
AT vabalina comparativeeffectivenessofspiraprilandenalaprilinpatientswithcoronaryheartdiseasecausedchronicheartfailure
AT mapushnikova comparativeeffectivenessofspiraprilandenalaprilinpatientswithcoronaryheartdiseasecausedchronicheartfailure
AT vashchupletsova comparativeeffectivenessofspiraprilandenalaprilinpatientswithcoronaryheartdiseasecausedchronicheartfailure
AT svshalaev comparativeeffectivenessofspiraprilandenalaprilinpatientswithcoronaryheartdiseasecausedchronicheartfailure