Using grounded theory approach in management research
In the field of management research, the grounded theory approach (GTA) pioneered by Glaser and Strauss (1967) is frequently cited to assert methodological validity in qualitative theory-building studies, in contrast with quantitative research that uses majority hypothesis validation. Glaser and Str...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Global Business Research Center
2019-04-01
|
Series: | Annals of Business Administrative Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/abas/18/2/18_0190326a/_pdf/-char/en |
_version_ | 1818862611816513536 |
---|---|
author | Hidenori Sato |
author_facet | Hidenori Sato |
author_sort | Hidenori Sato |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In the field of management research, the grounded theory approach (GTA) pioneered by Glaser and Strauss (1967) is frequently cited to assert methodological validity in qualitative theory-building studies, in contrast with quantitative research that uses majority hypothesis validation. Glaser and Strauss eventually came to disagree with each other, and GTA branched into three perspectives. Of these, Strauss and Corbin (1990), which defines coding and other analytical processes in detail, is cited most frequently although the studies that cite it do not necessarily reflect its characteristics. It is, therefore, clear that the differences in these three perspectives are not connected with differences in research methodologies. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-19T10:02:37Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ddbf7ee74f144ee08ae53fa0610479ad |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1347-4464 1347-4456 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-19T10:02:37Z |
publishDate | 2019-04-01 |
publisher | Global Business Research Center |
record_format | Article |
series | Annals of Business Administrative Science |
spelling | doaj.art-ddbf7ee74f144ee08ae53fa0610479ad2022-12-21T20:26:36ZengGlobal Business Research CenterAnnals of Business Administrative Science1347-44641347-44562019-04-01182657410.7880/abas.0190326aabasUsing grounded theory approach in management researchHidenori Sato0Faculty of Business Sciences, University of TsukubaIn the field of management research, the grounded theory approach (GTA) pioneered by Glaser and Strauss (1967) is frequently cited to assert methodological validity in qualitative theory-building studies, in contrast with quantitative research that uses majority hypothesis validation. Glaser and Strauss eventually came to disagree with each other, and GTA branched into three perspectives. Of these, Strauss and Corbin (1990), which defines coding and other analytical processes in detail, is cited most frequently although the studies that cite it do not necessarily reflect its characteristics. It is, therefore, clear that the differences in these three perspectives are not connected with differences in research methodologies.https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/abas/18/2/18_0190326a/_pdf/-char/enqualitative researchgrounded theory approachtheory buildingmanagement research |
spellingShingle | Hidenori Sato Using grounded theory approach in management research Annals of Business Administrative Science qualitative research grounded theory approach theory building management research |
title | Using grounded theory approach in management research |
title_full | Using grounded theory approach in management research |
title_fullStr | Using grounded theory approach in management research |
title_full_unstemmed | Using grounded theory approach in management research |
title_short | Using grounded theory approach in management research |
title_sort | using grounded theory approach in management research |
topic | qualitative research grounded theory approach theory building management research |
url | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/abas/18/2/18_0190326a/_pdf/-char/en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hidenorisato usinggroundedtheoryapproachinmanagementresearch |