A cautious green light for technology-driven mass surveillance
<p>Yesterday, on 27 January 2022, Advocate General Pitruzzella published his Opinion in the CJEU’s preliminary ruling procedure on the PNR Directive and its compatibility with EU primary law. The AG, while criticizing the PNR Directive’s overly broad data retention period and its lac...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
|
Series: | Verfassungsblog |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/green-light/ |
_version_ | 1817969228556271616 |
---|---|
author | Christian Thönnes |
author_facet | Christian Thönnes |
author_sort | Christian Thönnes |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <p>Yesterday, on 27 January 2022, Advocate General Pitruzzella published his Opinion in the CJEU’s preliminary ruling procedure on the PNR Directive and its compatibility with EU primary law. The AG, while criticizing the PNR Directive’s overly broad data retention period and its lack of clarity and precision in certain points, generally considers the PNR Directive to be “compatible with the fundamental rights to respect for private life and to the protection of personal data”. His arguments are not convincing. </p>
|
first_indexed | 2024-04-13T20:18:41Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ddca8d805552476e84eedc1b7c759707 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2366-7044 |
language | deu |
last_indexed | 2024-04-13T20:18:41Z |
publisher | Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH |
record_format | Article |
series | Verfassungsblog |
spelling | doaj.art-ddca8d805552476e84eedc1b7c7597072022-12-22T02:31:37ZdeuMax Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbHVerfassungsblog2366-70442366-7044A cautious green light for technology-driven mass surveillanceChristian Thönnes<p>Yesterday, on 27 January 2022, Advocate General Pitruzzella published his Opinion in the CJEU’s preliminary ruling procedure on the PNR Directive and its compatibility with EU primary law. The AG, while criticizing the PNR Directive’s overly broad data retention period and its lack of clarity and precision in certain points, generally considers the PNR Directive to be “compatible with the fundamental rights to respect for private life and to the protection of personal data”. His arguments are not convincing. </p> https://verfassungsblog.de/green-light/passenger name record, PNR, surveillance |
spellingShingle | Christian Thönnes A cautious green light for technology-driven mass surveillance Verfassungsblog passenger name record, PNR, surveillance |
title | A cautious green light for technology-driven mass surveillance |
title_full | A cautious green light for technology-driven mass surveillance |
title_fullStr | A cautious green light for technology-driven mass surveillance |
title_full_unstemmed | A cautious green light for technology-driven mass surveillance |
title_short | A cautious green light for technology-driven mass surveillance |
title_sort | cautious green light for technology driven mass surveillance |
topic | passenger name record, PNR, surveillance |
url | https://verfassungsblog.de/green-light/ |
work_keys_str_mv | AT christianthonnes acautiousgreenlightfortechnologydrivenmasssurveillance AT christianthonnes cautiousgreenlightfortechnologydrivenmasssurveillance |