A cautious green light for technology-driven mass surveillance

<p>Yesterday, on 27 January 2022, Advocate General Pitruzzella published his Opinion in the CJEU&#8217;s preliminary ruling procedure on the PNR Directive and its compatibility with EU primary law. The AG, while criticizing the PNR Directive’s overly broad data retention period and its lac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Christian Thönnes
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
Series:Verfassungsblog
Subjects:
Online Access:https://verfassungsblog.de/green-light/
_version_ 1817969228556271616
author Christian Thönnes
author_facet Christian Thönnes
author_sort Christian Thönnes
collection DOAJ
description <p>Yesterday, on 27 January 2022, Advocate General Pitruzzella published his Opinion in the CJEU&#8217;s preliminary ruling procedure on the PNR Directive and its compatibility with EU primary law. The AG, while criticizing the PNR Directive’s overly broad data retention period and its lack of clarity and precision in certain points, generally considers the PNR Directive to be “compatible with the fundamental rights to respect for private life and to the protection of personal data”. His arguments are not convincing. </p>
first_indexed 2024-04-13T20:18:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ddca8d805552476e84eedc1b7c759707
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2366-7044
language deu
last_indexed 2024-04-13T20:18:41Z
publisher Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
record_format Article
series Verfassungsblog
spelling doaj.art-ddca8d805552476e84eedc1b7c7597072022-12-22T02:31:37ZdeuMax Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbHVerfassungsblog2366-70442366-7044A cautious green light for technology-driven mass surveillanceChristian Thönnes<p>Yesterday, on 27 January 2022, Advocate General Pitruzzella published his Opinion in the CJEU&#8217;s preliminary ruling procedure on the PNR Directive and its compatibility with EU primary law. The AG, while criticizing the PNR Directive’s overly broad data retention period and its lack of clarity and precision in certain points, generally considers the PNR Directive to be “compatible with the fundamental rights to respect for private life and to the protection of personal data”. His arguments are not convincing. </p> https://verfassungsblog.de/green-light/passenger name record, PNR, surveillance
spellingShingle Christian Thönnes
A cautious green light for technology-driven mass surveillance
Verfassungsblog
passenger name record, PNR, surveillance
title A cautious green light for technology-driven mass surveillance
title_full A cautious green light for technology-driven mass surveillance
title_fullStr A cautious green light for technology-driven mass surveillance
title_full_unstemmed A cautious green light for technology-driven mass surveillance
title_short A cautious green light for technology-driven mass surveillance
title_sort cautious green light for technology driven mass surveillance
topic passenger name record, PNR, surveillance
url https://verfassungsblog.de/green-light/
work_keys_str_mv AT christianthonnes acautiousgreenlightfortechnologydrivenmasssurveillance
AT christianthonnes cautiousgreenlightfortechnologydrivenmasssurveillance