Stroke Outcomes With Vorapaxar Versus Placebo in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the TRACER Trial

Background Vorapaxar, a protease‐activated receptor‐1 antagonist, is approved for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events but is associated with increased intracranial hemorrhage. Methods and Results TRACER (Thrombin Receptor Antagonist for Clinical Event Reduction in Acute Coronary Syndrome)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leo Ungar, Robert M. Clare, Fatima Rodriguez, Bradley J. Kolls, Paul W. Armstrong, Philip Aylward, Claes Held, David J. Moliterno, John Strony, Frans Van de Werf, Lars Wallentin, Harvey D. White, Pierluigi Tricoci, Robert A. Harrington, Kenneth W. Mahaffey, Chiara Melloni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-12-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.118.009609
_version_ 1828858120026193920
author Leo Ungar
Robert M. Clare
Fatima Rodriguez
Bradley J. Kolls
Paul W. Armstrong
Philip Aylward
Claes Held
David J. Moliterno
John Strony
Frans Van de Werf
Lars Wallentin
Harvey D. White
Pierluigi Tricoci
Robert A. Harrington
Kenneth W. Mahaffey
Chiara Melloni
author_facet Leo Ungar
Robert M. Clare
Fatima Rodriguez
Bradley J. Kolls
Paul W. Armstrong
Philip Aylward
Claes Held
David J. Moliterno
John Strony
Frans Van de Werf
Lars Wallentin
Harvey D. White
Pierluigi Tricoci
Robert A. Harrington
Kenneth W. Mahaffey
Chiara Melloni
author_sort Leo Ungar
collection DOAJ
description Background Vorapaxar, a protease‐activated receptor‐1 antagonist, is approved for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events but is associated with increased intracranial hemorrhage. Methods and Results TRACER (Thrombin Receptor Antagonist for Clinical Event Reduction in Acute Coronary Syndrome) was a trial of vorapaxar versus placebo among patients with acute coronary syndrome. Strokes were adjudicated by a central events committee. Of 12 944 patients, 199 (1.5%) had ≥1 stroke during the study period (median follow‐up, 477 days). Four patients had a single stroke of unknown type; 195 patients had ≥1 stroke classified as hemorrhagic or nonhemorrhagic (165 nonhemorrhagic, 28 hemorrhagic, and 2 both). Strokes occurred in 96 of 6473 patients (1.5%) assigned vorapaxar and 103 of 6471 patients (1.6%) assigned placebo. Kaplan‐Meier incidence of stroke for vorapaxar versus placebo was higher for hemorrhagic stroke (0.45% versus 0.14% [hazard ratio, 2.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.22–6.15]), lower but not significantly different for nonhemorrhagic stroke (1.53% versus 1.98% at 2 years [hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.58–1.07]), and similar for stroke overall (1.93% versus 2.13% at 2 years [hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.71–1.24]). Conclusions Stroke occurred in <2% of patients. Vorapaxar‐assigned patients had increased hemorrhagic stroke but a nonsignificant trend toward lower nonhemorrhagic stroke. Overall stroke frequency was similar with vorapaxar versus placebo.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T01:51:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ddd00c1d3d304d07b3f96b5f6ed6633f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T01:51:31Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-ddd00c1d3d304d07b3f96b5f6ed6633f2022-12-22T00:03:31ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802018-12-0172410.1161/JAHA.118.009609Stroke Outcomes With Vorapaxar Versus Placebo in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the TRACER TrialLeo Ungar0Robert M. Clare1Fatima Rodriguez2Bradley J. Kolls3Paul W. Armstrong4Philip Aylward5Claes Held6David J. Moliterno7John Strony8Frans Van de Werf9Lars Wallentin10Harvey D. White11Pierluigi Tricoci12Robert A. Harrington13Kenneth W. Mahaffey14Chiara Melloni15Department of Cardiology University of California Irvine Medical Center Orange CADepartment of Medicine Duke Clinical Research Institute Durham NCDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CADepartment of Medicine Duke Clinical Research Institute Durham NCDivision of Cardiology University of Alberta Edmonton CanadaSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute Flinders University and Medical Centre Adelaide AustraliaUppsala Clinical Research Center Uppsala University Uppsala SwedenDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine Gill Heart Institute University of Kentucky Lexington KYJohnson &amp; Johnson New Brunswick NJDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences University Hospitals Leuven Leuven BelgiumUppsala Clinical Research Center Uppsala University Uppsala SwedenGreen Lane Cardiovascular Service Auckland City Hospital Auckland New ZealandDepartment of Medicine Duke Clinical Research Institute Durham NCDepartment of Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CADepartment of Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CADepartment of Medicine Duke Clinical Research Institute Durham NCBackground Vorapaxar, a protease‐activated receptor‐1 antagonist, is approved for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events but is associated with increased intracranial hemorrhage. Methods and Results TRACER (Thrombin Receptor Antagonist for Clinical Event Reduction in Acute Coronary Syndrome) was a trial of vorapaxar versus placebo among patients with acute coronary syndrome. Strokes were adjudicated by a central events committee. Of 12 944 patients, 199 (1.5%) had ≥1 stroke during the study period (median follow‐up, 477 days). Four patients had a single stroke of unknown type; 195 patients had ≥1 stroke classified as hemorrhagic or nonhemorrhagic (165 nonhemorrhagic, 28 hemorrhagic, and 2 both). Strokes occurred in 96 of 6473 patients (1.5%) assigned vorapaxar and 103 of 6471 patients (1.6%) assigned placebo. Kaplan‐Meier incidence of stroke for vorapaxar versus placebo was higher for hemorrhagic stroke (0.45% versus 0.14% [hazard ratio, 2.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.22–6.15]), lower but not significantly different for nonhemorrhagic stroke (1.53% versus 1.98% at 2 years [hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.58–1.07]), and similar for stroke overall (1.93% versus 2.13% at 2 years [hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.71–1.24]). Conclusions Stroke occurred in <2% of patients. Vorapaxar‐assigned patients had increased hemorrhagic stroke but a nonsignificant trend toward lower nonhemorrhagic stroke. Overall stroke frequency was similar with vorapaxar versus placebo.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.118.009609acute coronary syndromestrokevorapaxar
spellingShingle Leo Ungar
Robert M. Clare
Fatima Rodriguez
Bradley J. Kolls
Paul W. Armstrong
Philip Aylward
Claes Held
David J. Moliterno
John Strony
Frans Van de Werf
Lars Wallentin
Harvey D. White
Pierluigi Tricoci
Robert A. Harrington
Kenneth W. Mahaffey
Chiara Melloni
Stroke Outcomes With Vorapaxar Versus Placebo in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the TRACER Trial
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
acute coronary syndrome
stroke
vorapaxar
title Stroke Outcomes With Vorapaxar Versus Placebo in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the TRACER Trial
title_full Stroke Outcomes With Vorapaxar Versus Placebo in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the TRACER Trial
title_fullStr Stroke Outcomes With Vorapaxar Versus Placebo in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the TRACER Trial
title_full_unstemmed Stroke Outcomes With Vorapaxar Versus Placebo in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the TRACER Trial
title_short Stroke Outcomes With Vorapaxar Versus Placebo in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the TRACER Trial
title_sort stroke outcomes with vorapaxar versus placebo in patients with acute coronary syndromes insights from the tracer trial
topic acute coronary syndrome
stroke
vorapaxar
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.118.009609
work_keys_str_mv AT leoungar strokeoutcomeswithvorapaxarversusplaceboinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesinsightsfromthetracertrial
AT robertmclare strokeoutcomeswithvorapaxarversusplaceboinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesinsightsfromthetracertrial
AT fatimarodriguez strokeoutcomeswithvorapaxarversusplaceboinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesinsightsfromthetracertrial
AT bradleyjkolls strokeoutcomeswithvorapaxarversusplaceboinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesinsightsfromthetracertrial
AT paulwarmstrong strokeoutcomeswithvorapaxarversusplaceboinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesinsightsfromthetracertrial
AT philipaylward strokeoutcomeswithvorapaxarversusplaceboinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesinsightsfromthetracertrial
AT claesheld strokeoutcomeswithvorapaxarversusplaceboinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesinsightsfromthetracertrial
AT davidjmoliterno strokeoutcomeswithvorapaxarversusplaceboinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesinsightsfromthetracertrial
AT johnstrony strokeoutcomeswithvorapaxarversusplaceboinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesinsightsfromthetracertrial
AT fransvandewerf strokeoutcomeswithvorapaxarversusplaceboinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesinsightsfromthetracertrial
AT larswallentin strokeoutcomeswithvorapaxarversusplaceboinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesinsightsfromthetracertrial
AT harveydwhite strokeoutcomeswithvorapaxarversusplaceboinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesinsightsfromthetracertrial
AT pierluigitricoci strokeoutcomeswithvorapaxarversusplaceboinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesinsightsfromthetracertrial
AT robertaharrington strokeoutcomeswithvorapaxarversusplaceboinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesinsightsfromthetracertrial
AT kennethwmahaffey strokeoutcomeswithvorapaxarversusplaceboinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesinsightsfromthetracertrial
AT chiaramelloni strokeoutcomeswithvorapaxarversusplaceboinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndromesinsightsfromthetracertrial