The Ambivalence of Platforms. Between Surveillance and Resistance in the Management of Vulnerable Populations

This contribution aims to summarize and highlight the main themes emerged during the panel “Surveillance infrastructures or open platforms? Aid and control of vulnerable populations through digital data” that took place at the VIII STS Italia Conference. The panel invited to reflect upon the ambival...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lorenzo Olivieri, Annalisa Pelizza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Bologna – Dipartimento di Filosofia e Comunicazione 2022-03-01
Series:Tecnoscienza
Subjects:
Online Access:https://tecnoscienza.unibo.it/article/view/17516
_version_ 1797349187836182528
author Lorenzo Olivieri
Annalisa Pelizza
author_facet Lorenzo Olivieri
Annalisa Pelizza
author_sort Lorenzo Olivieri
collection DOAJ
description This contribution aims to summarize and highlight the main themes emerged during the panel “Surveillance infrastructures or open platforms? Aid and control of vulnerable populations through digital data” that took place at the VIII STS Italia Conference. The panel invited to reflect upon the ambivalence and ambiguity of digital platforms and data infrastructures for population management as well as on the highly diversified functions and users they support and attract. More precisely, presenters were encouraged to enquire how platforms and data infrastructures affect vulnerable populations and reconfigure the boundaries between the private and public domains: how do they allow empowering and innovative communication and resistance strategies? How, on the contrary, do they produce novel or exacerbate already existing vulnerabilities? How is the modern distinction between government, business, and civil society de facto reshuffled as a consequence? Although panel’s presentations discussed remarkably different types of platforms – from online maps and social networks to public health databases and migration technologies – they overall emphasized that only a careful, situated analysis of the multiple socio-technical factors shaping users’ engagement might help to understand how – and why – those technologies become tools for control and surveillance or empowerment resources.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T12:25:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ddd6563b910f4df98d415b847d79e6f2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2038-3460
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T12:25:42Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher University of Bologna – Dipartimento di Filosofia e Comunicazione
record_format Article
series Tecnoscienza
spelling doaj.art-ddd6563b910f4df98d415b847d79e6f22024-01-22T10:27:43ZengUniversity of Bologna – Dipartimento di Filosofia e ComunicazioneTecnoscienza2038-34602022-03-011229910610.6092/issn.2038-3460/1751615875The Ambivalence of Platforms. Between Surveillance and Resistance in the Management of Vulnerable PopulationsLorenzo Olivieri0Annalisa Pelizza1University of BolognaUniversity of BolognaThis contribution aims to summarize and highlight the main themes emerged during the panel “Surveillance infrastructures or open platforms? Aid and control of vulnerable populations through digital data” that took place at the VIII STS Italia Conference. The panel invited to reflect upon the ambivalence and ambiguity of digital platforms and data infrastructures for population management as well as on the highly diversified functions and users they support and attract. More precisely, presenters were encouraged to enquire how platforms and data infrastructures affect vulnerable populations and reconfigure the boundaries between the private and public domains: how do they allow empowering and innovative communication and resistance strategies? How, on the contrary, do they produce novel or exacerbate already existing vulnerabilities? How is the modern distinction between government, business, and civil society de facto reshuffled as a consequence? Although panel’s presentations discussed remarkably different types of platforms – from online maps and social networks to public health databases and migration technologies – they overall emphasized that only a careful, situated analysis of the multiple socio-technical factors shaping users’ engagement might help to understand how – and why – those technologies become tools for control and surveillance or empowerment resources.https://tecnoscienza.unibo.it/article/view/17516platformssurveillanceresistancevulnerable populationsdata infrastructures
spellingShingle Lorenzo Olivieri
Annalisa Pelizza
The Ambivalence of Platforms. Between Surveillance and Resistance in the Management of Vulnerable Populations
Tecnoscienza
platforms
surveillance
resistance
vulnerable populations
data infrastructures
title The Ambivalence of Platforms. Between Surveillance and Resistance in the Management of Vulnerable Populations
title_full The Ambivalence of Platforms. Between Surveillance and Resistance in the Management of Vulnerable Populations
title_fullStr The Ambivalence of Platforms. Between Surveillance and Resistance in the Management of Vulnerable Populations
title_full_unstemmed The Ambivalence of Platforms. Between Surveillance and Resistance in the Management of Vulnerable Populations
title_short The Ambivalence of Platforms. Between Surveillance and Resistance in the Management of Vulnerable Populations
title_sort ambivalence of platforms between surveillance and resistance in the management of vulnerable populations
topic platforms
surveillance
resistance
vulnerable populations
data infrastructures
url https://tecnoscienza.unibo.it/article/view/17516
work_keys_str_mv AT lorenzoolivieri theambivalenceofplatformsbetweensurveillanceandresistanceinthemanagementofvulnerablepopulations
AT annalisapelizza theambivalenceofplatformsbetweensurveillanceandresistanceinthemanagementofvulnerablepopulations
AT lorenzoolivieri ambivalenceofplatformsbetweensurveillanceandresistanceinthemanagementofvulnerablepopulations
AT annalisapelizza ambivalenceofplatformsbetweensurveillanceandresistanceinthemanagementofvulnerablepopulations