Intra-Operative Somatosensory-Evoked Potential Monitoring

Purpose. To evaluate the usefulness of intra-operative somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) in monitoring spinal cord status via the posterior tibial nerve. Methods. 84 men and 28 women aged 16 to 66 years (72% were aged 20 to 40 years) with spinal trauma (63 in the lumbar and 49 in the thoracic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: AS Chandanwale, AA Ramteke, S Barhate
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2008-12-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900801600301
_version_ 1818258057759555584
author AS Chandanwale
AA Ramteke
S Barhate
author_facet AS Chandanwale
AA Ramteke
S Barhate
author_sort AS Chandanwale
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To evaluate the usefulness of intra-operative somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) in monitoring spinal cord status via the posterior tibial nerve. Methods. 84 men and 28 women aged 16 to 66 years (72% were aged 20 to 40 years) with spinal trauma (63 in the lumbar and 49 in the thoracic spine) underwent posterior instrumentation and fusion using bone grafts. All 63 patients with lumbar spinal injury and 35 of the patients with thoracic spinal injury were treated with pedicular screws. The remaining 14 patients had their thoracic spinal injury fixed with sublaminar wires. Cortical scalp recordings were used. Baseline tracings were obtained prior to surgical intervention and after establishment of anaesthesia. If changes persisted for more than 15 to 20 minutes or if they did not show definite signs of resolution, event reversal was considered. Results. Of the 112 patients, 74 (66%) had no changes in Cz-Fpz patterns and neurological status, whereas 14 (13%) showed improved patterns (2 of them had the same neurological status postoperatively) and 24 (21%) displayed deteriorated patterns prompting intervention. Of the 24 patients prompting intervention, 20 improved substantially (19 had no new neurological deficits and one had deteriorated neurological status) and 4 improved minimally (2 had no new deficit and 2 had new deficits), with 88% sensitivity and 78% specificity. 15 patients were true-positives with an identifiable cause; 21 were false-positives with no neurological deterioration or recognisable cause. Conclusion. Intra-operative SSEP monitoring helps identify acute neurological and systemic (hypoxia or hypotension) impairment and enables prompt correction. This makes surgery available to high-risk patients and enables surgeons to carry out more extensive procedures. It also provides valuable documentation in the event of medico-legal dispute.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T17:53:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dddecb924bb14f759eeca841f596f8ee
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2309-4990
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T17:53:30Z
publishDate 2008-12-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
spelling doaj.art-dddecb924bb14f759eeca841f596f8ee2022-12-22T00:16:46ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902008-12-011610.1177/230949900801600301Intra-Operative Somatosensory-Evoked Potential MonitoringAS ChandanwaleAA RamtekeS BarhatePurpose. To evaluate the usefulness of intra-operative somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) in monitoring spinal cord status via the posterior tibial nerve. Methods. 84 men and 28 women aged 16 to 66 years (72% were aged 20 to 40 years) with spinal trauma (63 in the lumbar and 49 in the thoracic spine) underwent posterior instrumentation and fusion using bone grafts. All 63 patients with lumbar spinal injury and 35 of the patients with thoracic spinal injury were treated with pedicular screws. The remaining 14 patients had their thoracic spinal injury fixed with sublaminar wires. Cortical scalp recordings were used. Baseline tracings were obtained prior to surgical intervention and after establishment of anaesthesia. If changes persisted for more than 15 to 20 minutes or if they did not show definite signs of resolution, event reversal was considered. Results. Of the 112 patients, 74 (66%) had no changes in Cz-Fpz patterns and neurological status, whereas 14 (13%) showed improved patterns (2 of them had the same neurological status postoperatively) and 24 (21%) displayed deteriorated patterns prompting intervention. Of the 24 patients prompting intervention, 20 improved substantially (19 had no new neurological deficits and one had deteriorated neurological status) and 4 improved minimally (2 had no new deficit and 2 had new deficits), with 88% sensitivity and 78% specificity. 15 patients were true-positives with an identifiable cause; 21 were false-positives with no neurological deterioration or recognisable cause. Conclusion. Intra-operative SSEP monitoring helps identify acute neurological and systemic (hypoxia or hypotension) impairment and enables prompt correction. This makes surgery available to high-risk patients and enables surgeons to carry out more extensive procedures. It also provides valuable documentation in the event of medico-legal dispute.https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900801600301
spellingShingle AS Chandanwale
AA Ramteke
S Barhate
Intra-Operative Somatosensory-Evoked Potential Monitoring
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
title Intra-Operative Somatosensory-Evoked Potential Monitoring
title_full Intra-Operative Somatosensory-Evoked Potential Monitoring
title_fullStr Intra-Operative Somatosensory-Evoked Potential Monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Intra-Operative Somatosensory-Evoked Potential Monitoring
title_short Intra-Operative Somatosensory-Evoked Potential Monitoring
title_sort intra operative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring
url https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900801600301
work_keys_str_mv AT aschandanwale intraoperativesomatosensoryevokedpotentialmonitoring
AT aaramteke intraoperativesomatosensoryevokedpotentialmonitoring
AT sbarhate intraoperativesomatosensoryevokedpotentialmonitoring