Comparing chemistry to outcome: the development of a chemical distance metric, coupled with clustering and hierarchal visualization applied to macromolecular crystallography.
Many bioscience fields employ high-throughput methods to screen multiple biochemical conditions. The analysis of these becomes tedious without a degree of automation. Crystallization, a rate limiting step in biological X-ray crystallography, is one of these fields. Screening of multiple potential cr...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4074061?pdf=render |
| _version_ | 1819237945344786432 |
|---|---|
| author | Andrew E Bruno Amanda M Ruby Joseph R Luft Thomas D Grant Jayaraman Seetharaman Gaetano T Montelione John F Hunt Edward H Snell |
| author_facet | Andrew E Bruno Amanda M Ruby Joseph R Luft Thomas D Grant Jayaraman Seetharaman Gaetano T Montelione John F Hunt Edward H Snell |
| author_sort | Andrew E Bruno |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Many bioscience fields employ high-throughput methods to screen multiple biochemical conditions. The analysis of these becomes tedious without a degree of automation. Crystallization, a rate limiting step in biological X-ray crystallography, is one of these fields. Screening of multiple potential crystallization conditions (cocktails) is the most effective method of probing a proteins phase diagram and guiding crystallization but the interpretation of results can be time-consuming. To aid this empirical approach a cocktail distance coefficient was developed to quantitatively compare macromolecule crystallization conditions and outcome. These coefficients were evaluated against an existing similarity metric developed for crystallization, the C6 metric, using both virtual crystallization screens and by comparison of two related 1,536-cocktail high-throughput crystallization screens. Hierarchical clustering was employed to visualize one of these screens and the crystallization results from an exopolyphosphatase-related protein from Bacteroides fragilis, (BfR192) overlaid on this clustering. This demonstrated a strong correlation between certain chemically related clusters and crystal lead conditions. While this analysis was not used to guide the initial crystallization optimization, it led to the re-evaluation of unexplained peaks in the electron density map of the protein and to the insertion and correct placement of sodium, potassium and phosphate atoms in the structure. With these in place, the resulting structure of the putative active site demonstrated features consistent with active sites of other phosphatases which are involved in binding the phosphoryl moieties of nucleotide triphosphates. The new distance coefficient, CDcoeff, appears to be robust in this application, and coupled with hierarchical clustering and the overlay of crystallization outcome, reveals information of biological relevance. While tested with a single example the potential applications related to crystallography appear promising and the distance coefficient, clustering, and hierarchal visualization of results undoubtedly have applications in wider fields. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-23T13:28:23Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-dde777582b5349c8a764b52b92a6b7a4 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-23T13:28:23Z |
| publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-dde777582b5349c8a764b52b92a6b7a42022-12-21T17:45:14ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0196e10078210.1371/journal.pone.0100782Comparing chemistry to outcome: the development of a chemical distance metric, coupled with clustering and hierarchal visualization applied to macromolecular crystallography.Andrew E BrunoAmanda M RubyJoseph R LuftThomas D GrantJayaraman SeetharamanGaetano T MontelioneJohn F HuntEdward H SnellMany bioscience fields employ high-throughput methods to screen multiple biochemical conditions. The analysis of these becomes tedious without a degree of automation. Crystallization, a rate limiting step in biological X-ray crystallography, is one of these fields. Screening of multiple potential crystallization conditions (cocktails) is the most effective method of probing a proteins phase diagram and guiding crystallization but the interpretation of results can be time-consuming. To aid this empirical approach a cocktail distance coefficient was developed to quantitatively compare macromolecule crystallization conditions and outcome. These coefficients were evaluated against an existing similarity metric developed for crystallization, the C6 metric, using both virtual crystallization screens and by comparison of two related 1,536-cocktail high-throughput crystallization screens. Hierarchical clustering was employed to visualize one of these screens and the crystallization results from an exopolyphosphatase-related protein from Bacteroides fragilis, (BfR192) overlaid on this clustering. This demonstrated a strong correlation between certain chemically related clusters and crystal lead conditions. While this analysis was not used to guide the initial crystallization optimization, it led to the re-evaluation of unexplained peaks in the electron density map of the protein and to the insertion and correct placement of sodium, potassium and phosphate atoms in the structure. With these in place, the resulting structure of the putative active site demonstrated features consistent with active sites of other phosphatases which are involved in binding the phosphoryl moieties of nucleotide triphosphates. The new distance coefficient, CDcoeff, appears to be robust in this application, and coupled with hierarchical clustering and the overlay of crystallization outcome, reveals information of biological relevance. While tested with a single example the potential applications related to crystallography appear promising and the distance coefficient, clustering, and hierarchal visualization of results undoubtedly have applications in wider fields.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4074061?pdf=render |
| spellingShingle | Andrew E Bruno Amanda M Ruby Joseph R Luft Thomas D Grant Jayaraman Seetharaman Gaetano T Montelione John F Hunt Edward H Snell Comparing chemistry to outcome: the development of a chemical distance metric, coupled with clustering and hierarchal visualization applied to macromolecular crystallography. PLoS ONE |
| title | Comparing chemistry to outcome: the development of a chemical distance metric, coupled with clustering and hierarchal visualization applied to macromolecular crystallography. |
| title_full | Comparing chemistry to outcome: the development of a chemical distance metric, coupled with clustering and hierarchal visualization applied to macromolecular crystallography. |
| title_fullStr | Comparing chemistry to outcome: the development of a chemical distance metric, coupled with clustering and hierarchal visualization applied to macromolecular crystallography. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparing chemistry to outcome: the development of a chemical distance metric, coupled with clustering and hierarchal visualization applied to macromolecular crystallography. |
| title_short | Comparing chemistry to outcome: the development of a chemical distance metric, coupled with clustering and hierarchal visualization applied to macromolecular crystallography. |
| title_sort | comparing chemistry to outcome the development of a chemical distance metric coupled with clustering and hierarchal visualization applied to macromolecular crystallography |
| url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4074061?pdf=render |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT andrewebruno comparingchemistrytooutcomethedevelopmentofachemicaldistancemetriccoupledwithclusteringandhierarchalvisualizationappliedtomacromolecularcrystallography AT amandamruby comparingchemistrytooutcomethedevelopmentofachemicaldistancemetriccoupledwithclusteringandhierarchalvisualizationappliedtomacromolecularcrystallography AT josephrluft comparingchemistrytooutcomethedevelopmentofachemicaldistancemetriccoupledwithclusteringandhierarchalvisualizationappliedtomacromolecularcrystallography AT thomasdgrant comparingchemistrytooutcomethedevelopmentofachemicaldistancemetriccoupledwithclusteringandhierarchalvisualizationappliedtomacromolecularcrystallography AT jayaramanseetharaman comparingchemistrytooutcomethedevelopmentofachemicaldistancemetriccoupledwithclusteringandhierarchalvisualizationappliedtomacromolecularcrystallography AT gaetanotmontelione comparingchemistrytooutcomethedevelopmentofachemicaldistancemetriccoupledwithclusteringandhierarchalvisualizationappliedtomacromolecularcrystallography AT johnfhunt comparingchemistrytooutcomethedevelopmentofachemicaldistancemetriccoupledwithclusteringandhierarchalvisualizationappliedtomacromolecularcrystallography AT edwardhsnell comparingchemistrytooutcomethedevelopmentofachemicaldistancemetriccoupledwithclusteringandhierarchalvisualizationappliedtomacromolecularcrystallography |