Nanometrology and its perspectives in environmental research

Objectives Rapid increase in engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in many goods has raised significant concern about their environmental safety. Proper methodologies are therefore needed to conduct toxicity and exposure assessment of nanoparticles in the environment. This study reviews several analytical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hyun-A Kim, Jung-Kwan Seo, Taksoo Kim, Byung-Tae Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Environmental Health and Toxicology 2014-10-01
Series:Environmental Health and Toxicology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-eht.org/upload/pdf/eht-29-e2014016.pdf
_version_ 1819173630980915200
author Hyun-A Kim
Jung-Kwan Seo
Taksoo Kim
Byung-Tae Lee
author_facet Hyun-A Kim
Jung-Kwan Seo
Taksoo Kim
Byung-Tae Lee
author_sort Hyun-A Kim
collection DOAJ
description Objectives Rapid increase in engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in many goods has raised significant concern about their environmental safety. Proper methodologies are therefore needed to conduct toxicity and exposure assessment of nanoparticles in the environment. This study reviews several analytical techniques for nanoparticles and summarizes their principles, advantages and disadvantages, reviews the state of the art, and offers the perspectives of nanometrology in relation to ENP studies. Methods Nanometrology is divided into five techniques with regard to the instrumental principle: microscopy, light scattering, spectroscopy, separation, and single particle inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Results Each analytical method has its own drawbacks, such as detection limit, ability to quantify or qualify ENPs, and matrix effects. More than two different analytical methods should be used to better characterize ENPs. Conclusions In characterizing ENPs, the researchers should understand the nanometrology and its demerits, as well as its merits, to properly interpret their experimental results. Challenges lie in the nanometrology and pretreatment of ENPs from various matrices; in the extraction without dissolution or aggregation, and concentration of ENPs to satisfy the instrumental detection limit.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T20:26:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ddeb8d2fd56d46a2acadcaf8afd863b5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2233-6567
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T20:26:08Z
publishDate 2014-10-01
publisher Korean Society of Environmental Health and Toxicology
record_format Article
series Environmental Health and Toxicology
spelling doaj.art-ddeb8d2fd56d46a2acadcaf8afd863b52022-12-21T18:13:44ZengKorean Society of Environmental Health and ToxicologyEnvironmental Health and Toxicology2233-65672014-10-012910.5620/eht.e201401686Nanometrology and its perspectives in environmental researchHyun-A Kim0Jung-Kwan Seo1Taksoo Kim2Byung-Tae Lee3 School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju, Korea Division of Risk Assessment, National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), Incheon, Korea Division of Risk Assessment, National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), Incheon, Korea School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Gwangju, KoreaObjectives Rapid increase in engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in many goods has raised significant concern about their environmental safety. Proper methodologies are therefore needed to conduct toxicity and exposure assessment of nanoparticles in the environment. This study reviews several analytical techniques for nanoparticles and summarizes their principles, advantages and disadvantages, reviews the state of the art, and offers the perspectives of nanometrology in relation to ENP studies. Methods Nanometrology is divided into five techniques with regard to the instrumental principle: microscopy, light scattering, spectroscopy, separation, and single particle inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Results Each analytical method has its own drawbacks, such as detection limit, ability to quantify or qualify ENPs, and matrix effects. More than two different analytical methods should be used to better characterize ENPs. Conclusions In characterizing ENPs, the researchers should understand the nanometrology and its demerits, as well as its merits, to properly interpret their experimental results. Challenges lie in the nanometrology and pretreatment of ENPs from various matrices; in the extraction without dissolution or aggregation, and concentration of ENPs to satisfy the instrumental detection limit.http://www.e-eht.org/upload/pdf/eht-29-e2014016.pdfEngineered nanoparticleLight scatteringMicroscopic analysisNanometrologySeparation techniqueSingle particle inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry
spellingShingle Hyun-A Kim
Jung-Kwan Seo
Taksoo Kim
Byung-Tae Lee
Nanometrology and its perspectives in environmental research
Environmental Health and Toxicology
Engineered nanoparticle
Light scattering
Microscopic analysis
Nanometrology
Separation technique
Single particle inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry
title Nanometrology and its perspectives in environmental research
title_full Nanometrology and its perspectives in environmental research
title_fullStr Nanometrology and its perspectives in environmental research
title_full_unstemmed Nanometrology and its perspectives in environmental research
title_short Nanometrology and its perspectives in environmental research
title_sort nanometrology and its perspectives in environmental research
topic Engineered nanoparticle
Light scattering
Microscopic analysis
Nanometrology
Separation technique
Single particle inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry
url http://www.e-eht.org/upload/pdf/eht-29-e2014016.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hyunakim nanometrologyanditsperspectivesinenvironmentalresearch
AT jungkwanseo nanometrologyanditsperspectivesinenvironmentalresearch
AT taksookim nanometrologyanditsperspectivesinenvironmentalresearch
AT byungtaelee nanometrologyanditsperspectivesinenvironmentalresearch