Comparative study on earthquake and ground based transmitter induced radiation belt electron precipitation at middle latitudes

We examined (peak-to-background flux ratio <i>p/b</i> > 20) energetic electron bursts in the presence of VLF activity, as observed from the DEMETER satellite at low altitudes (~700 km). Our statistical analysis of measurements during two 6-month periods suggests th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. F. Sidiropoulos, G. Anagnostopoulos, V. Rigas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2011-07-01
Series:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/11/1901/2011/nhess-11-1901-2011.pdf
_version_ 1819032552726331392
author N. F. Sidiropoulos
G. Anagnostopoulos
V. Rigas
author_facet N. F. Sidiropoulos
G. Anagnostopoulos
V. Rigas
author_sort N. F. Sidiropoulos
collection DOAJ
description We examined (peak-to-background flux ratio <i>p/b</i> > 20) energetic electron bursts in the presence of VLF activity, as observed from the DEMETER satellite at low altitudes (~700 km). Our statistical analysis of measurements during two 6-month periods suggests that: (a) the powerful transmitter NWC causes the strongest effects on the inner radiation belts in comparison with other ground-based VLF transmitters, (b) the NWC transmitter was responsible for only ~1.5 % of total electron bursts examined during the 6-month period (1 July 2008 to 31 December 2008), (c) VLF transmitter-related electron bursts are accompanied by the presence of a narrow band emission centered at the radiating frequency emission, whereas the earthquake-related electron bursts are accompanied by the presence of broadband emissions from a few kHz to >20 KHz, (d) daytime events are less preferable than nighttime events, but this asymmetry was found to be less evident when the powerful transmitter NWC was turned off and (d) seismic activity most probably dominated the electromagnetic interactions producing the electron precipitation at middle latitudes. The results of this study support the proposal that the detection of radiation belt electron precipitation, besides other kinds of studies, is a useful tool for earthquake prediction research.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T07:03:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ddf25495edba4dd5b42cdd30684333ff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1561-8633
1684-9981
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T07:03:46Z
publishDate 2011-07-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
spelling doaj.art-ddf25495edba4dd5b42cdd30684333ff2022-12-21T19:12:09ZengCopernicus PublicationsNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences1561-86331684-99812011-07-011171901191310.5194/nhess-11-1901-2011Comparative study on earthquake and ground based transmitter induced radiation belt electron precipitation at middle latitudesN. F. SidiropoulosG. AnagnostopoulosV. RigasWe examined (peak-to-background flux ratio <i>p/b</i> > 20) energetic electron bursts in the presence of VLF activity, as observed from the DEMETER satellite at low altitudes (~700 km). Our statistical analysis of measurements during two 6-month periods suggests that: (a) the powerful transmitter NWC causes the strongest effects on the inner radiation belts in comparison with other ground-based VLF transmitters, (b) the NWC transmitter was responsible for only ~1.5 % of total electron bursts examined during the 6-month period (1 July 2008 to 31 December 2008), (c) VLF transmitter-related electron bursts are accompanied by the presence of a narrow band emission centered at the radiating frequency emission, whereas the earthquake-related electron bursts are accompanied by the presence of broadband emissions from a few kHz to >20 KHz, (d) daytime events are less preferable than nighttime events, but this asymmetry was found to be less evident when the powerful transmitter NWC was turned off and (d) seismic activity most probably dominated the electromagnetic interactions producing the electron precipitation at middle latitudes. The results of this study support the proposal that the detection of radiation belt electron precipitation, besides other kinds of studies, is a useful tool for earthquake prediction research.http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/11/1901/2011/nhess-11-1901-2011.pdf
spellingShingle N. F. Sidiropoulos
G. Anagnostopoulos
V. Rigas
Comparative study on earthquake and ground based transmitter induced radiation belt electron precipitation at middle latitudes
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
title Comparative study on earthquake and ground based transmitter induced radiation belt electron precipitation at middle latitudes
title_full Comparative study on earthquake and ground based transmitter induced radiation belt electron precipitation at middle latitudes
title_fullStr Comparative study on earthquake and ground based transmitter induced radiation belt electron precipitation at middle latitudes
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study on earthquake and ground based transmitter induced radiation belt electron precipitation at middle latitudes
title_short Comparative study on earthquake and ground based transmitter induced radiation belt electron precipitation at middle latitudes
title_sort comparative study on earthquake and ground based transmitter induced radiation belt electron precipitation at middle latitudes
url http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/11/1901/2011/nhess-11-1901-2011.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nfsidiropoulos comparativestudyonearthquakeandgroundbasedtransmitterinducedradiationbeltelectronprecipitationatmiddlelatitudes
AT ganagnostopoulos comparativestudyonearthquakeandgroundbasedtransmitterinducedradiationbeltelectronprecipitationatmiddlelatitudes
AT vrigas comparativestudyonearthquakeandgroundbasedtransmitterinducedradiationbeltelectronprecipitationatmiddlelatitudes