Mining Industry of Prikamye: on the Question of the Formation of Historiographic Tradition
Some problems of the tradition of studying the mining industry of Prikamye in the context of the economic policy of the state in the pre-revolutionary period of Russian historiography (the second half of the 18th - early 20th centuries) are considered. The relevance of the study is due, in particula...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
2019-10-01
|
| Series: | Научный диалог |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/1344 |
| _version_ | 1797245795060154368 |
|---|---|
| author | L. N. Bekhtereva |
| author_facet | L. N. Bekhtereva |
| author_sort | L. N. Bekhtereva |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Some problems of the tradition of studying the mining industry of Prikamye in the context of the economic policy of the state in the pre-revolutionary period of Russian historiography (the second half of the 18th - early 20th centuries) are considered. The relevance of the study is due, in particular, to the tercentenary of the publication on December 21 (10), December 1719 by Peter I of Berg-Privilege, which for the first time established the legal foundations of mining in Russia, as well as the need to describe the latest trends and results of the interaction of physical nature and the human community, which are of contradictory character. The main attention is paid to the analysis of those works of encyclopedic scientists, participants in academic expeditions, historians, geographers, economists, statisticians, mining engineers and representatives of other fields of knowledge that contain information at the regional level. It is concluded that the study of the mining industry and its impact on the natural and social environment began in parallel with the further development of resources in the second half of the 18th century, mainly Prikamye, the Urals and Siberia and, as a result, the emergence of new factory settlements. It is shown that the works of scientists were of an interdisciplinary nature, had a pronounced practical orientation and were largely determined by the need to ensure the fiscal interests of the empire. It is alleged that a complex of fundamental and applied problems was raised, which determined the content of research in the subsequent period. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T04:31:28Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ddfe191d188d4473b1c932a39fecf0b1 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2225-756X 2227-1295 |
| language | Russian |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T19:32:35Z |
| publishDate | 2019-10-01 |
| publisher | Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Научный диалог |
| spelling | doaj.art-ddfe191d188d4473b1c932a39fecf0b12024-03-25T14:30:59ZrusTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovНаучный диалог2225-756X2227-12952019-10-0101034736410.24224/2227-1295-2019-10-347-3641340Mining Industry of Prikamye: on the Question of the Formation of Historiographic TraditionL. N. Bekhtereva0Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science “Udmurt Federal Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences”Some problems of the tradition of studying the mining industry of Prikamye in the context of the economic policy of the state in the pre-revolutionary period of Russian historiography (the second half of the 18th - early 20th centuries) are considered. The relevance of the study is due, in particular, to the tercentenary of the publication on December 21 (10), December 1719 by Peter I of Berg-Privilege, which for the first time established the legal foundations of mining in Russia, as well as the need to describe the latest trends and results of the interaction of physical nature and the human community, which are of contradictory character. The main attention is paid to the analysis of those works of encyclopedic scientists, participants in academic expeditions, historians, geographers, economists, statisticians, mining engineers and representatives of other fields of knowledge that contain information at the regional level. It is concluded that the study of the mining industry and its impact on the natural and social environment began in parallel with the further development of resources in the second half of the 18th century, mainly Prikamye, the Urals and Siberia and, as a result, the emergence of new factory settlements. It is shown that the works of scientists were of an interdisciplinary nature, had a pronounced practical orientation and were largely determined by the need to ensure the fiscal interests of the empire. It is alleged that a complex of fundamental and applied problems was raised, which determined the content of research in the subsequent period.https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/1344historiographic traditionimperial periodmining industryprikamyeanthropogenic landscape |
| spellingShingle | L. N. Bekhtereva Mining Industry of Prikamye: on the Question of the Formation of Historiographic Tradition Научный диалог historiographic tradition imperial period mining industry prikamye anthropogenic landscape |
| title | Mining Industry of Prikamye: on the Question of the Formation of Historiographic Tradition |
| title_full | Mining Industry of Prikamye: on the Question of the Formation of Historiographic Tradition |
| title_fullStr | Mining Industry of Prikamye: on the Question of the Formation of Historiographic Tradition |
| title_full_unstemmed | Mining Industry of Prikamye: on the Question of the Formation of Historiographic Tradition |
| title_short | Mining Industry of Prikamye: on the Question of the Formation of Historiographic Tradition |
| title_sort | mining industry of prikamye on the question of the formation of historiographic tradition |
| topic | historiographic tradition imperial period mining industry prikamye anthropogenic landscape |
| url | https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/1344 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lnbekhtereva miningindustryofprikamyeonthequestionoftheformationofhistoriographictradition |