Identification and comparison of Chlamydia psittaci, Legionella and Mycoplasma pneumonia infection

Abstract Introduction Conventional etiological detection and pathogenic antibody methods make it challenging to identify the atypical pathogens among the community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP). Metagenomic next‐generation sequencing (mNGS) could rapidly detect all potentially infectious diseases and ide...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ning Zhu, Daibing Zhou, Ruyu Yuan, Yiminniyaze Ruzetuoheti, Jing Li, Xiujuan Zhang, Shengqing Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-05-01
Series:The Clinical Respiratory Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.13603
_version_ 1797818879393660928
author Ning Zhu
Daibing Zhou
Ruyu Yuan
Yiminniyaze Ruzetuoheti
Jing Li
Xiujuan Zhang
Shengqing Li
author_facet Ning Zhu
Daibing Zhou
Ruyu Yuan
Yiminniyaze Ruzetuoheti
Jing Li
Xiujuan Zhang
Shengqing Li
author_sort Ning Zhu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction Conventional etiological detection and pathogenic antibody methods make it challenging to identify the atypical pathogens among the community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP). Metagenomic next‐generation sequencing (mNGS) could rapidly detect all potentially infectious diseases and identifies novel or potential pathogens. Methods Eighteen patients diagnosed with atypical CAP were enrolled in this retrospective study, including nine Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia (C. p), four Legionella pneumonia (L. p) and five Mycoplasma pneumonia (M. p). We simultaneously tested bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples for conventional microbiological methods and mNGS, and blood specimens were analysed. We also collected and compared baseline and clinical characteristics and treatment responses. Results Patients with C. p and L. p had similar symptoms, including fever, cough, headache, dyspnoea, asthenia, shivering and headache, compared with M. p, whose symptoms were slight. C. p and L. p usually showed multiple lobar distributions with pleural effusion. Serologic testing indicated that L. p had higher levels of white blood cells (WBCs), neutrophils, C‐reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and creatinine compared with M. p and L. p (p < 0.05). However, patients with C. p had lower levels of albumin (p < 0.05), and M. p had a minimum risk of cardiac volume loads (p < 0.05). CD4/CD8 ratio, lymphocytes, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), creatine kinase (CK), cell counting of BALF and coagulation had no difference (p < 0.05). Pathogenic IgM assay showed that 4/5 cases were positive for M. p and no positive detection for C. p and L. p infection. We timely adjusted the antibiotics according to the final mNGS results. Eventually, 16/18 patients recovered fully. Conditions of L. p patients were worse than those of C. p patients, and those of M. p patients were the least. Conclusion Early application of mNGS detection increased the atypical pathogenic identification, improved the prognosis and made up for the deficiency of conventional detection methods.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T09:15:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-de097d518fff4ece9f0d13c756cbd22a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1752-6981
1752-699X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T09:15:38Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Clinical Respiratory Journal
spelling doaj.art-de097d518fff4ece9f0d13c756cbd22a2023-05-26T10:50:31ZengWileyThe Clinical Respiratory Journal1752-69811752-699X2023-05-0117538439310.1111/crj.13603Identification and comparison of Chlamydia psittaci, Legionella and Mycoplasma pneumonia infectionNing Zhu0Daibing Zhou1Ruyu Yuan2Yiminniyaze Ruzetuoheti3Jing Li4Xiujuan Zhang5Shengqing Li6Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Huashan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai ChinaDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Huashan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai ChinaDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Huashan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai ChinaDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Huashan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai ChinaDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Huashan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai ChinaDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Huashan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai ChinaDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Huashan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai ChinaAbstract Introduction Conventional etiological detection and pathogenic antibody methods make it challenging to identify the atypical pathogens among the community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP). Metagenomic next‐generation sequencing (mNGS) could rapidly detect all potentially infectious diseases and identifies novel or potential pathogens. Methods Eighteen patients diagnosed with atypical CAP were enrolled in this retrospective study, including nine Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia (C. p), four Legionella pneumonia (L. p) and five Mycoplasma pneumonia (M. p). We simultaneously tested bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples for conventional microbiological methods and mNGS, and blood specimens were analysed. We also collected and compared baseline and clinical characteristics and treatment responses. Results Patients with C. p and L. p had similar symptoms, including fever, cough, headache, dyspnoea, asthenia, shivering and headache, compared with M. p, whose symptoms were slight. C. p and L. p usually showed multiple lobar distributions with pleural effusion. Serologic testing indicated that L. p had higher levels of white blood cells (WBCs), neutrophils, C‐reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and creatinine compared with M. p and L. p (p < 0.05). However, patients with C. p had lower levels of albumin (p < 0.05), and M. p had a minimum risk of cardiac volume loads (p < 0.05). CD4/CD8 ratio, lymphocytes, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), creatine kinase (CK), cell counting of BALF and coagulation had no difference (p < 0.05). Pathogenic IgM assay showed that 4/5 cases were positive for M. p and no positive detection for C. p and L. p infection. We timely adjusted the antibiotics according to the final mNGS results. Eventually, 16/18 patients recovered fully. Conditions of L. p patients were worse than those of C. p patients, and those of M. p patients were the least. Conclusion Early application of mNGS detection increased the atypical pathogenic identification, improved the prognosis and made up for the deficiency of conventional detection methods.https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.13603Chlamydia psittacicommunity‐acquired pneumonia (CAP)Legionellametagenomic next‐generation sequencing (mNGS)Mycoplasmatreatment
spellingShingle Ning Zhu
Daibing Zhou
Ruyu Yuan
Yiminniyaze Ruzetuoheti
Jing Li
Xiujuan Zhang
Shengqing Li
Identification and comparison of Chlamydia psittaci, Legionella and Mycoplasma pneumonia infection
The Clinical Respiratory Journal
Chlamydia psittaci
community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP)
Legionella
metagenomic next‐generation sequencing (mNGS)
Mycoplasma
treatment
title Identification and comparison of Chlamydia psittaci, Legionella and Mycoplasma pneumonia infection
title_full Identification and comparison of Chlamydia psittaci, Legionella and Mycoplasma pneumonia infection
title_fullStr Identification and comparison of Chlamydia psittaci, Legionella and Mycoplasma pneumonia infection
title_full_unstemmed Identification and comparison of Chlamydia psittaci, Legionella and Mycoplasma pneumonia infection
title_short Identification and comparison of Chlamydia psittaci, Legionella and Mycoplasma pneumonia infection
title_sort identification and comparison of chlamydia psittaci legionella and mycoplasma pneumonia infection
topic Chlamydia psittaci
community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP)
Legionella
metagenomic next‐generation sequencing (mNGS)
Mycoplasma
treatment
url https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.13603
work_keys_str_mv AT ningzhu identificationandcomparisonofchlamydiapsittacilegionellaandmycoplasmapneumoniainfection
AT daibingzhou identificationandcomparisonofchlamydiapsittacilegionellaandmycoplasmapneumoniainfection
AT ruyuyuan identificationandcomparisonofchlamydiapsittacilegionellaandmycoplasmapneumoniainfection
AT yiminniyazeruzetuoheti identificationandcomparisonofchlamydiapsittacilegionellaandmycoplasmapneumoniainfection
AT jingli identificationandcomparisonofchlamydiapsittacilegionellaandmycoplasmapneumoniainfection
AT xiujuanzhang identificationandcomparisonofchlamydiapsittacilegionellaandmycoplasmapneumoniainfection
AT shengqingli identificationandcomparisonofchlamydiapsittacilegionellaandmycoplasmapneumoniainfection