The Identity of Fictional Characters

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26333/sts.xxxvi1.04 Fictional characters elicit prima facie conflicting intuitions. On the one hand, a fictional character seems linked to the particular work of fiction (a novel, a poem, a movie, etc.) in which it appears: Ulysses is described in one way in Homer’s epic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Enrico Grosso
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Polskie Towarzystwo Semiotyczne / The Polish Semiotic Society 2022-11-01
Series:Studia Semiotyczne
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pts2.home.pl/studiaojs/index.php/Studiasemiotyczne/article/view/234
_version_ 1828099110858653696
author Enrico Grosso
author_facet Enrico Grosso
author_sort Enrico Grosso
collection DOAJ
description DOI: https://doi.org/10.26333/sts.xxxvi1.04 Fictional characters elicit prima facie conflicting intuitions. On the one hand, a fictional character seems linked to the particular work of fiction (a novel, a poem, a movie, etc.) in which it appears: Ulysses is described in one way in Homer’s epic poems, in another way in Virgil’s Aeneid, and in a still different way in Dante’s Divine Comedy. It is natural to distinguish Homer’s Ulysses from Virgil’s and Dante’s ones, since each of them has specific properties. On the other hand, we have the strong temptation to think that Ulysses is the same fictional character that persists in the passage from one poem to another, despite the change of features. The article tackles this kind of problems by focusing on the cognitive side. By adopting the theory of mental files, I will argue that all issues on the identity of literary characters here presented can be addressed without assuming the existence of fictional objects. Presumption of co-reference between multiple depictions of a given literary character is represented in our mind by means of a network of files, each one indexed to a work of fiction in which the character appears. Indexed files have a meta-representational function, so they do not need acquaintance with real objects. Linked indexed files do not refer, but still a unique reference is presuppose. They would have the same referent, if there was one.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T08:13:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-de11fbf47e7342bcbbc32dc2c769d472
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0137-6608
2544-073X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T08:13:07Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Polskie Towarzystwo Semiotyczne / The Polish Semiotic Society
record_format Article
series Studia Semiotyczne
spelling doaj.art-de11fbf47e7342bcbbc32dc2c769d4722022-12-22T04:35:18ZengPolskie Towarzystwo Semiotyczne / The Polish Semiotic SocietyStudia Semiotyczne0137-66082544-073X2022-11-01361The Identity of Fictional CharactersEnrico Grosso0University of Genova, FINO [Northwestern Italian Philosophy Consortium] DOI: https://doi.org/10.26333/sts.xxxvi1.04 Fictional characters elicit prima facie conflicting intuitions. On the one hand, a fictional character seems linked to the particular work of fiction (a novel, a poem, a movie, etc.) in which it appears: Ulysses is described in one way in Homer’s epic poems, in another way in Virgil’s Aeneid, and in a still different way in Dante’s Divine Comedy. It is natural to distinguish Homer’s Ulysses from Virgil’s and Dante’s ones, since each of them has specific properties. On the other hand, we have the strong temptation to think that Ulysses is the same fictional character that persists in the passage from one poem to another, despite the change of features. The article tackles this kind of problems by focusing on the cognitive side. By adopting the theory of mental files, I will argue that all issues on the identity of literary characters here presented can be addressed without assuming the existence of fictional objects. Presumption of co-reference between multiple depictions of a given literary character is represented in our mind by means of a network of files, each one indexed to a work of fiction in which the character appears. Indexed files have a meta-representational function, so they do not need acquaintance with real objects. Linked indexed files do not refer, but still a unique reference is presuppose. They would have the same referent, if there was one. http://pts2.home.pl/studiaojs/index.php/Studiasemiotyczne/article/view/234mental filesindexed filesfictional charactersidentityco-reference
spellingShingle Enrico Grosso
The Identity of Fictional Characters
Studia Semiotyczne
mental files
indexed files
fictional characters
identity
co-reference
title The Identity of Fictional Characters
title_full The Identity of Fictional Characters
title_fullStr The Identity of Fictional Characters
title_full_unstemmed The Identity of Fictional Characters
title_short The Identity of Fictional Characters
title_sort identity of fictional characters
topic mental files
indexed files
fictional characters
identity
co-reference
url http://pts2.home.pl/studiaojs/index.php/Studiasemiotyczne/article/view/234
work_keys_str_mv AT enricogrosso theidentityoffictionalcharacters
AT enricogrosso identityoffictionalcharacters