Trajectories and determinants of left ventricular ejection fraction after the first myocardial infarction in the current era of primary coronary interventions

BackgroundLeft ventricular ejection fraction (EF) is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes after myocardial infarction (MI). However, current data on trajectories and determinants of EF are scarce. The present study aimed to describe the epidemiology of EF after MI.MethodsData from a single-c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Wohlfahrt, Dominik Jenča, Vojtěch Melenovský, Marek Šramko, Martin Kotrč, Michael Želízko, Jolana Mrázková, Věra Adámková, Jan Pitha, Josef Kautzner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1051995/full
_version_ 1798015345438490624
author Peter Wohlfahrt
Peter Wohlfahrt
Dominik Jenča
Dominik Jenča
Vojtěch Melenovský
Marek Šramko
Martin Kotrč
Michael Želízko
Jolana Mrázková
Věra Adámková
Jan Pitha
Josef Kautzner
Josef Kautzner
author_facet Peter Wohlfahrt
Peter Wohlfahrt
Dominik Jenča
Dominik Jenča
Vojtěch Melenovský
Marek Šramko
Martin Kotrč
Michael Želízko
Jolana Mrázková
Věra Adámková
Jan Pitha
Josef Kautzner
Josef Kautzner
author_sort Peter Wohlfahrt
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundLeft ventricular ejection fraction (EF) is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes after myocardial infarction (MI). However, current data on trajectories and determinants of EF are scarce. The present study aimed to describe the epidemiology of EF after MI.MethodsData from a single-center prospectively-designed registry of consecutive patients hospitalized at a large tertiary cardiology center were utilized.ResultsOut of 1,593 patients in the registry, 1,065 were hospitalized for MI type I (65.4% STEMI) and had no previous history of heart failure or MI. At discharge, EF < 40% was present in 238 (22.3%), EF 40–50% in 326 (30.6%) and EF > 50% in 501 (47.0%). Patients with EF < 40% were often those who suffered subacute and anterior STEMI, had higher heart rate at admission and higher maximal troponin level, and had more often HF signs requiring intravenous diuretics. Among subjects with EF < 40%, the follow-up EF was available in 166 (80% of eligible). Systolic function recovered to EF > 50% in 39 (23.1%), slightly improved to EF 40–50% in 44 (26.0%) and remained below 40% in 86 (50.9%). Systolic function improvement to EF > 40% was predicted by lower severity of coronary atherosclerosis, lower leukocyte count, and the absence of atrial fibrillation.ConclusionsDespite recent improvements in in-hospital MI care, one in five patients has systolic dysfunction at hospital discharge. Out of these, EF improves in 51%, and full recovery is observed in 23%. The severity of coronary atherosclerosis, inflammatory response to MI, and atrial fibrillation may affect EF recovery.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T15:32:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-de1df35f829b4df89220837b1c0e227f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-055X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T15:32:52Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj.art-de1df35f829b4df89220837b1c0e227f2022-12-22T04:16:06ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2022-11-01910.3389/fcvm.2022.10519951051995Trajectories and determinants of left ventricular ejection fraction after the first myocardial infarction in the current era of primary coronary interventionsPeter Wohlfahrt0Peter Wohlfahrt1Dominik Jenča2Dominik Jenča3Vojtěch Melenovský4Marek Šramko5Martin Kotrč6Michael Želízko7Jolana Mrázková8Věra Adámková9Jan Pitha10Josef Kautzner11Josef Kautzner12Department of Preventive Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, CzechiaFirst Medical School, Charles University, Prague, CzechiaDepartment of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, CzechiaThird Medical School, Charles University, Prague, CzechiaDepartment of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, CzechiaDepartment of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, CzechiaDepartment of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, CzechiaDepartment of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, CzechiaDepartment of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, CzechiaDepartment of Preventive Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, CzechiaDepartment of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, CzechiaDepartment of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, CzechiaMedical and Dentistry School, Palacký University, Olomouc, CzechiaBackgroundLeft ventricular ejection fraction (EF) is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes after myocardial infarction (MI). However, current data on trajectories and determinants of EF are scarce. The present study aimed to describe the epidemiology of EF after MI.MethodsData from a single-center prospectively-designed registry of consecutive patients hospitalized at a large tertiary cardiology center were utilized.ResultsOut of 1,593 patients in the registry, 1,065 were hospitalized for MI type I (65.4% STEMI) and had no previous history of heart failure or MI. At discharge, EF < 40% was present in 238 (22.3%), EF 40–50% in 326 (30.6%) and EF > 50% in 501 (47.0%). Patients with EF < 40% were often those who suffered subacute and anterior STEMI, had higher heart rate at admission and higher maximal troponin level, and had more often HF signs requiring intravenous diuretics. Among subjects with EF < 40%, the follow-up EF was available in 166 (80% of eligible). Systolic function recovered to EF > 50% in 39 (23.1%), slightly improved to EF 40–50% in 44 (26.0%) and remained below 40% in 86 (50.9%). Systolic function improvement to EF > 40% was predicted by lower severity of coronary atherosclerosis, lower leukocyte count, and the absence of atrial fibrillation.ConclusionsDespite recent improvements in in-hospital MI care, one in five patients has systolic dysfunction at hospital discharge. Out of these, EF improves in 51%, and full recovery is observed in 23%. The severity of coronary atherosclerosis, inflammatory response to MI, and atrial fibrillation may affect EF recovery.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1051995/fullmyocardial infarctionejection fraction (EF%)systolic dysfunctioninflammationatrial fibrillationepidemiology
spellingShingle Peter Wohlfahrt
Peter Wohlfahrt
Dominik Jenča
Dominik Jenča
Vojtěch Melenovský
Marek Šramko
Martin Kotrč
Michael Želízko
Jolana Mrázková
Věra Adámková
Jan Pitha
Josef Kautzner
Josef Kautzner
Trajectories and determinants of left ventricular ejection fraction after the first myocardial infarction in the current era of primary coronary interventions
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
myocardial infarction
ejection fraction (EF%)
systolic dysfunction
inflammation
atrial fibrillation
epidemiology
title Trajectories and determinants of left ventricular ejection fraction after the first myocardial infarction in the current era of primary coronary interventions
title_full Trajectories and determinants of left ventricular ejection fraction after the first myocardial infarction in the current era of primary coronary interventions
title_fullStr Trajectories and determinants of left ventricular ejection fraction after the first myocardial infarction in the current era of primary coronary interventions
title_full_unstemmed Trajectories and determinants of left ventricular ejection fraction after the first myocardial infarction in the current era of primary coronary interventions
title_short Trajectories and determinants of left ventricular ejection fraction after the first myocardial infarction in the current era of primary coronary interventions
title_sort trajectories and determinants of left ventricular ejection fraction after the first myocardial infarction in the current era of primary coronary interventions
topic myocardial infarction
ejection fraction (EF%)
systolic dysfunction
inflammation
atrial fibrillation
epidemiology
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1051995/full
work_keys_str_mv AT peterwohlfahrt trajectoriesanddeterminantsofleftventricularejectionfractionafterthefirstmyocardialinfarctioninthecurrenteraofprimarycoronaryinterventions
AT peterwohlfahrt trajectoriesanddeterminantsofleftventricularejectionfractionafterthefirstmyocardialinfarctioninthecurrenteraofprimarycoronaryinterventions
AT dominikjenca trajectoriesanddeterminantsofleftventricularejectionfractionafterthefirstmyocardialinfarctioninthecurrenteraofprimarycoronaryinterventions
AT dominikjenca trajectoriesanddeterminantsofleftventricularejectionfractionafterthefirstmyocardialinfarctioninthecurrenteraofprimarycoronaryinterventions
AT vojtechmelenovsky trajectoriesanddeterminantsofleftventricularejectionfractionafterthefirstmyocardialinfarctioninthecurrenteraofprimarycoronaryinterventions
AT mareksramko trajectoriesanddeterminantsofleftventricularejectionfractionafterthefirstmyocardialinfarctioninthecurrenteraofprimarycoronaryinterventions
AT martinkotrc trajectoriesanddeterminantsofleftventricularejectionfractionafterthefirstmyocardialinfarctioninthecurrenteraofprimarycoronaryinterventions
AT michaelzelizko trajectoriesanddeterminantsofleftventricularejectionfractionafterthefirstmyocardialinfarctioninthecurrenteraofprimarycoronaryinterventions
AT jolanamrazkova trajectoriesanddeterminantsofleftventricularejectionfractionafterthefirstmyocardialinfarctioninthecurrenteraofprimarycoronaryinterventions
AT veraadamkova trajectoriesanddeterminantsofleftventricularejectionfractionafterthefirstmyocardialinfarctioninthecurrenteraofprimarycoronaryinterventions
AT janpitha trajectoriesanddeterminantsofleftventricularejectionfractionafterthefirstmyocardialinfarctioninthecurrenteraofprimarycoronaryinterventions
AT josefkautzner trajectoriesanddeterminantsofleftventricularejectionfractionafterthefirstmyocardialinfarctioninthecurrenteraofprimarycoronaryinterventions
AT josefkautzner trajectoriesanddeterminantsofleftventricularejectionfractionafterthefirstmyocardialinfarctioninthecurrenteraofprimarycoronaryinterventions