Effectiveness and safety of dermal matrix used for diabetic foot ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract Background Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) have become a global health concern, which can lead to diabetic foot infection (DFI), lower leg amputation, and even mortality. Though the standard of care (SOC) practices have been recognized as the “gold standard” for DFU care, SOC alone may not be a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lei Sui, Qiang Xie, Hong-tao Jiang, Xiao-dong Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-02-01
Series:BMC Endocrine Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-024-01550-3
_version_ 1797274333177970688
author Lei Sui
Qiang Xie
Hong-tao Jiang
Xiao-dong Li
author_facet Lei Sui
Qiang Xie
Hong-tao Jiang
Xiao-dong Li
author_sort Lei Sui
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) have become a global health concern, which can lead to diabetic foot infection (DFI), lower leg amputation, and even mortality. Though the standard of care (SOC) practices have been recognized as the “gold standard” for DFU care, SOC alone may not be adequate to heal all DFUs and prevent their recurrence. The use of dermal matrix has emerged as an adjuvant treatment to enhance DFU healing. The current study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dermal matrix application as an adjuvant treatment to the SOC. Methods The databases of PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL were independently searched by two authors, with the following key terms: “diabetic foot ulcer”, “acellular dermal matrix”, “wound healing”, and so on. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the efficacy and safety of dermal matrix in the treatment of DFUs were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcomes analyzed included time to complete healing and complete healing rate at the final follow-up, while secondary outcomes included wound area, ulcer recurrence rate, amputation risk and complication risk. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effect or fixed-effect models, based on the heterogeneity test. Results This study included a total of 15 RCTs with a total of 1524 subjects. Of these, 689 patients were treated with SOC alone, while 835 patients received SOC plus dermal matrix. Compared to the SOC group, significantly shorter time (MD = 2.84, 95%CI: 1.37 ~ 4.32, p < 0.001***) was required to achieve complete healing in dermal matrix group. Significantly higher complete healing rate (OR = 0.40, 95%CI: 0.33 ~ 0.49, p < 0.001***) and lower overall (RR = 1.83, 95%CI: 1.15 ~ 2.93, p = 0.011*) and major (RR = 2.64, 95%CI: 1.30 ~ 5.36, p = 0.007**) amputation risks were achieved in dermal matrix group compared to SOC group. No significant difference was found in the wound area, ulcer recurrence rate, and complication risk between the two groups. Conclusions The application of dermal matrix as an adjuvant therapy in conjunction with SOC effectively improved the healing process of DFUs and reduced the amputation risk when compared to SOC alone. Furthermore, dermal matrix application was well tolerated by the subjects with no added complication risk.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T14:57:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-de23f0c7a7be454f828a6f0728127c5d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6823
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T14:57:53Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Endocrine Disorders
spelling doaj.art-de23f0c7a7be454f828a6f0728127c5d2024-03-05T19:22:21ZengBMCBMC Endocrine Disorders1472-68232024-02-0124112010.1186/s12902-024-01550-3Effectiveness and safety of dermal matrix used for diabetic foot ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsLei Sui0Qiang Xie1Hong-tao Jiang2Xiao-dong Li3Department of Hand Foot Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical UniversityDepartment of Hand Foot Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical UniversityDepartment of Hand Foot Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical UniversityDepartment of Hand Foot Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical UniversityAbstract Background Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) have become a global health concern, which can lead to diabetic foot infection (DFI), lower leg amputation, and even mortality. Though the standard of care (SOC) practices have been recognized as the “gold standard” for DFU care, SOC alone may not be adequate to heal all DFUs and prevent their recurrence. The use of dermal matrix has emerged as an adjuvant treatment to enhance DFU healing. The current study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dermal matrix application as an adjuvant treatment to the SOC. Methods The databases of PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL were independently searched by two authors, with the following key terms: “diabetic foot ulcer”, “acellular dermal matrix”, “wound healing”, and so on. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the efficacy and safety of dermal matrix in the treatment of DFUs were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcomes analyzed included time to complete healing and complete healing rate at the final follow-up, while secondary outcomes included wound area, ulcer recurrence rate, amputation risk and complication risk. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effect or fixed-effect models, based on the heterogeneity test. Results This study included a total of 15 RCTs with a total of 1524 subjects. Of these, 689 patients were treated with SOC alone, while 835 patients received SOC plus dermal matrix. Compared to the SOC group, significantly shorter time (MD = 2.84, 95%CI: 1.37 ~ 4.32, p < 0.001***) was required to achieve complete healing in dermal matrix group. Significantly higher complete healing rate (OR = 0.40, 95%CI: 0.33 ~ 0.49, p < 0.001***) and lower overall (RR = 1.83, 95%CI: 1.15 ~ 2.93, p = 0.011*) and major (RR = 2.64, 95%CI: 1.30 ~ 5.36, p = 0.007**) amputation risks were achieved in dermal matrix group compared to SOC group. No significant difference was found in the wound area, ulcer recurrence rate, and complication risk between the two groups. Conclusions The application of dermal matrix as an adjuvant therapy in conjunction with SOC effectively improved the healing process of DFUs and reduced the amputation risk when compared to SOC alone. Furthermore, dermal matrix application was well tolerated by the subjects with no added complication risk.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-024-01550-3Dermal matrixDiabetic foot ulcerationWound healingMeta-analysis
spellingShingle Lei Sui
Qiang Xie
Hong-tao Jiang
Xiao-dong Li
Effectiveness and safety of dermal matrix used for diabetic foot ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BMC Endocrine Disorders
Dermal matrix
Diabetic foot ulceration
Wound healing
Meta-analysis
title Effectiveness and safety of dermal matrix used for diabetic foot ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Effectiveness and safety of dermal matrix used for diabetic foot ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Effectiveness and safety of dermal matrix used for diabetic foot ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and safety of dermal matrix used for diabetic foot ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Effectiveness and safety of dermal matrix used for diabetic foot ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort effectiveness and safety of dermal matrix used for diabetic foot ulcer a systematic review and meta analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Dermal matrix
Diabetic foot ulceration
Wound healing
Meta-analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-024-01550-3
work_keys_str_mv AT leisui effectivenessandsafetyofdermalmatrixusedfordiabeticfootulcerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT qiangxie effectivenessandsafetyofdermalmatrixusedfordiabeticfootulcerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT hongtaojiang effectivenessandsafetyofdermalmatrixusedfordiabeticfootulcerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xiaodongli effectivenessandsafetyofdermalmatrixusedfordiabeticfootulcerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials