Cross-Modal Conflict Increases With Time-on-Task in a Temporal Discrimination Task

The modality appropriateness hypothesis argues that the auditory modality is preferred over the visual modality in tasks demanding temporal operations; hence, we predicted that responses to visual stimuli would be more sensitive to the detrimental effect of Time-on-Task. We used a bimodal temporal d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: András Matuz, Dimitri Van der Linden, Kristóf Topa, Árpád Csathó
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02429/full
_version_ 1829490038418702336
author András Matuz
Dimitri Van der Linden
Kristóf Topa
Árpád Csathó
author_facet András Matuz
Dimitri Van der Linden
Kristóf Topa
Árpád Csathó
author_sort András Matuz
collection DOAJ
description The modality appropriateness hypothesis argues that the auditory modality is preferred over the visual modality in tasks demanding temporal operations; hence, we predicted that responses to visual stimuli would be more sensitive to the detrimental effect of Time-on-Task. We used a bimodal temporal discrimination task. The factors were durational congruency between the modalities and the direction of modality-transmission. Participants needed to decide the duration of the cued stimulus (visual or auditory). The first five blocks of the task lasted about 1.5 h without rest [Time-on-Task (ToT) period]. The participants then had a 12-min break followed by an additional block of trials. Subjective fatigue, reaction time, error rates, and electrocardiographic data were recorded. In the visual modality, we found an enhanced congruency effect as a function of ToT. The cost of attentional shifting was higher in the auditory modality, but remained constant, suggesting that processing of auditory stimuli is robust against the effects of fatigue. Performance did not improve after the break, indicating that the effects of fatigue could not be overcome by taking a brief break. The heart rate variability (HRV) data showed that vagal inhibition increased with ToT, but this increase was not associated with the changes in performance.
first_indexed 2024-12-15T00:17:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-de2ca8453cf54aa0b5e8cda0c5cb0974
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-15T00:17:07Z
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-de2ca8453cf54aa0b5e8cda0c5cb09742022-12-21T22:42:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782019-10-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.02429484982Cross-Modal Conflict Increases With Time-on-Task in a Temporal Discrimination TaskAndrás Matuz0Dimitri Van der Linden1Kristóf Topa2Árpád Csathó3Medical School, Department of Behavioural Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, HungaryDepartment of Psychology, Education, and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, NetherlandsInstitute of Psychology, University of Pécs, Pécs, HungaryMedical School, Department of Behavioural Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, HungaryThe modality appropriateness hypothesis argues that the auditory modality is preferred over the visual modality in tasks demanding temporal operations; hence, we predicted that responses to visual stimuli would be more sensitive to the detrimental effect of Time-on-Task. We used a bimodal temporal discrimination task. The factors were durational congruency between the modalities and the direction of modality-transmission. Participants needed to decide the duration of the cued stimulus (visual or auditory). The first five blocks of the task lasted about 1.5 h without rest [Time-on-Task (ToT) period]. The participants then had a 12-min break followed by an additional block of trials. Subjective fatigue, reaction time, error rates, and electrocardiographic data were recorded. In the visual modality, we found an enhanced congruency effect as a function of ToT. The cost of attentional shifting was higher in the auditory modality, but remained constant, suggesting that processing of auditory stimuli is robust against the effects of fatigue. Performance did not improve after the break, indicating that the effects of fatigue could not be overcome by taking a brief break. The heart rate variability (HRV) data showed that vagal inhibition increased with ToT, but this increase was not associated with the changes in performance.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02429/fulltime-on-taskmental fatiguecross-modal attentiontime discriminationheart rate variability
spellingShingle András Matuz
Dimitri Van der Linden
Kristóf Topa
Árpád Csathó
Cross-Modal Conflict Increases With Time-on-Task in a Temporal Discrimination Task
Frontiers in Psychology
time-on-task
mental fatigue
cross-modal attention
time discrimination
heart rate variability
title Cross-Modal Conflict Increases With Time-on-Task in a Temporal Discrimination Task
title_full Cross-Modal Conflict Increases With Time-on-Task in a Temporal Discrimination Task
title_fullStr Cross-Modal Conflict Increases With Time-on-Task in a Temporal Discrimination Task
title_full_unstemmed Cross-Modal Conflict Increases With Time-on-Task in a Temporal Discrimination Task
title_short Cross-Modal Conflict Increases With Time-on-Task in a Temporal Discrimination Task
title_sort cross modal conflict increases with time on task in a temporal discrimination task
topic time-on-task
mental fatigue
cross-modal attention
time discrimination
heart rate variability
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02429/full
work_keys_str_mv AT andrasmatuz crossmodalconflictincreaseswithtimeontaskinatemporaldiscriminationtask
AT dimitrivanderlinden crossmodalconflictincreaseswithtimeontaskinatemporaldiscriminationtask
AT kristoftopa crossmodalconflictincreaseswithtimeontaskinatemporaldiscriminationtask
AT arpadcsatho crossmodalconflictincreaseswithtimeontaskinatemporaldiscriminationtask