Death pluralism: a proposal

Abstract The debate over the determination of death has been raging for more than fifty years. Since then, objections against the diagnosis of brain death from family members of those diagnosed as dead-have been increasing and are causing some countries to take novel steps to accommodate people’s be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gonzalo Díaz-Cobacho, Alberto Molina-Pérez, David Rodríguez-Arias
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-08-01
Series:Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-023-00139-3
_version_ 1797451856694214656
author Gonzalo Díaz-Cobacho
Alberto Molina-Pérez
David Rodríguez-Arias
author_facet Gonzalo Díaz-Cobacho
Alberto Molina-Pérez
David Rodríguez-Arias
author_sort Gonzalo Díaz-Cobacho
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The debate over the determination of death has been raging for more than fifty years. Since then, objections against the diagnosis of brain death from family members of those diagnosed as dead-have been increasing and are causing some countries to take novel steps to accommodate people’s beliefs and preferences in the determination of death. This, coupled with criticism by some academics of the brain death criterion, raises some questions about the issues surrounding the determination of death. In this paper, we discuss some of the main approaches to death determination that have been theoretically proposed or currently put into practice and propose a new approach to death determination called "weak pluralism" as a reasonable ethical and political alternative to respect diversity in death determination.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:00:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-de2f3e5c37d745f4bc1e3aa7db277a9b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1747-5341
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:00:23Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
spelling doaj.art-de2f3e5c37d745f4bc1e3aa7db277a9b2023-11-26T13:57:37ZengBMCPhilosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine1747-53412023-08-0118111210.1186/s13010-023-00139-3Death pluralism: a proposalGonzalo Díaz-Cobacho0Alberto Molina-Pérez1David Rodríguez-Arias2Department of Philosophy I, University of GranadaInstituto de Estudios Sociales Avanzados (IESA), CSIC, IESA-CSICDepartment of Philosophy I, University of GranadaAbstract The debate over the determination of death has been raging for more than fifty years. Since then, objections against the diagnosis of brain death from family members of those diagnosed as dead-have been increasing and are causing some countries to take novel steps to accommodate people’s beliefs and preferences in the determination of death. This, coupled with criticism by some academics of the brain death criterion, raises some questions about the issues surrounding the determination of death. In this paper, we discuss some of the main approaches to death determination that have been theoretically proposed or currently put into practice and propose a new approach to death determination called "weak pluralism" as a reasonable ethical and political alternative to respect diversity in death determination.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-023-00139-3PluralismBrain deathAccommodationBioethicsReligion
spellingShingle Gonzalo Díaz-Cobacho
Alberto Molina-Pérez
David Rodríguez-Arias
Death pluralism: a proposal
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
Pluralism
Brain death
Accommodation
Bioethics
Religion
title Death pluralism: a proposal
title_full Death pluralism: a proposal
title_fullStr Death pluralism: a proposal
title_full_unstemmed Death pluralism: a proposal
title_short Death pluralism: a proposal
title_sort death pluralism a proposal
topic Pluralism
Brain death
Accommodation
Bioethics
Religion
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-023-00139-3
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalodiazcobacho deathpluralismaproposal
AT albertomolinaperez deathpluralismaproposal
AT davidrodriguezarias deathpluralismaproposal