Polygenic risk-tailored screening for prostate cancer: A benefit-harm and cost-effectiveness modelling study.
<h4>Background</h4>The United States Preventive Services Task Force supports individualised decision-making for prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening in men aged 55-69. Knowing how the potential benefits and harms of screening vary by an individual's risk of developing pro...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-12-01
|
| Series: | PLoS Medicine |
| Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002998&type=printable |
| _version_ | 1826574490911375360 |
|---|---|
| author | Tom Callender Mark Emberton Steve Morris Ros Eeles Ros Eeles Zsofia Kote-Jarai Paul D P Pharoah Nora Pashayan |
| author_facet | Tom Callender Mark Emberton Steve Morris Ros Eeles Ros Eeles Zsofia Kote-Jarai Paul D P Pharoah Nora Pashayan |
| author_sort | Tom Callender |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Background</h4>The United States Preventive Services Task Force supports individualised decision-making for prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening in men aged 55-69. Knowing how the potential benefits and harms of screening vary by an individual's risk of developing prostate cancer could inform decision-making about screening at both an individual and population level. This modelling study examined the benefit-harm tradeoffs and the cost-effectiveness of a risk-tailored screening programme compared to age-based and no screening.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>A life-table model, projecting age-specific prostate cancer incidence and mortality, was developed of a hypothetical cohort of 4.48 million men in England aged 55 to 69 years with follow-up to age 90. Risk thresholds were based on age and polygenic profile. We compared no screening, age-based screening (quadrennial PSA testing from 55 to 69), and risk-tailored screening (men aged 55 to 69 years with a 10-year absolute risk greater than a threshold receive quadrennial PSA testing from the age they reach the risk threshold). The analysis was undertaken from the health service perspective, including direct costs borne by the health system for risk assessment, screening, diagnosis, and treatment. We used probabilistic sensitivity analyses to account for parameter uncertainty and discounted future costs and benefits at 3.5% per year. Our analysis should be considered cautiously in light of limitations related to our model's cohort-based structure and the uncertainty of input parameters in mathematical models. Compared to no screening over 35 years follow-up, age-based screening prevented the most deaths from prostate cancer (39,272, 95% uncertainty interval [UI]: 16,792-59,685) at the expense of 94,831 (95% UI: 84,827-105,630) overdiagnosed cancers. Age-based screening was the least cost-effective strategy studied. The greatest number of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) was generated by risk-based screening at a 10-year absolute risk threshold of 4%. At this threshold, risk-based screening led to one-third fewer overdiagnosed cancers (64,384, 95% UI: 57,382-72,050) but averted 6.3% fewer (9,695, 95% UI: 2,853-15,851) deaths from prostate cancer by comparison with age-based screening. Relative to no screening, risk-based screening at a 4% 10-year absolute risk threshold was cost-effective in 48.4% and 57.4% of the simulations at willingness-to-pay thresholds of GBP£20,000 (US$26,000) and £30,000 ($39,386) per QALY, respectively. The cost-effectiveness of risk-tailored screening improved as the threshold rose.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Based on the results of this modelling study, offering screening to men at higher risk could potentially reduce overdiagnosis and improve the benefit-harm tradeoff and the cost-effectiveness of a prostate cancer screening program. The optimal threshold will depend on societal judgements of the appropriate balance of benefits-harms and cost-effectiveness. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-09T21:55:46Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-de324c2923e54be9a9fd9cbaf261abc9 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1549-1277 1549-1676 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-03-14T12:59:38Z |
| publishDate | 2019-12-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS Medicine |
| spelling | doaj.art-de324c2923e54be9a9fd9cbaf261abc92025-03-02T05:30:52ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Medicine1549-12771549-16762019-12-011612e100299810.1371/journal.pmed.1002998Polygenic risk-tailored screening for prostate cancer: A benefit-harm and cost-effectiveness modelling study.Tom CallenderMark EmbertonSteve MorrisRos EelesRos EelesZsofia Kote-JaraiPaul D P PharoahNora Pashayan<h4>Background</h4>The United States Preventive Services Task Force supports individualised decision-making for prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening in men aged 55-69. Knowing how the potential benefits and harms of screening vary by an individual's risk of developing prostate cancer could inform decision-making about screening at both an individual and population level. This modelling study examined the benefit-harm tradeoffs and the cost-effectiveness of a risk-tailored screening programme compared to age-based and no screening.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>A life-table model, projecting age-specific prostate cancer incidence and mortality, was developed of a hypothetical cohort of 4.48 million men in England aged 55 to 69 years with follow-up to age 90. Risk thresholds were based on age and polygenic profile. We compared no screening, age-based screening (quadrennial PSA testing from 55 to 69), and risk-tailored screening (men aged 55 to 69 years with a 10-year absolute risk greater than a threshold receive quadrennial PSA testing from the age they reach the risk threshold). The analysis was undertaken from the health service perspective, including direct costs borne by the health system for risk assessment, screening, diagnosis, and treatment. We used probabilistic sensitivity analyses to account for parameter uncertainty and discounted future costs and benefits at 3.5% per year. Our analysis should be considered cautiously in light of limitations related to our model's cohort-based structure and the uncertainty of input parameters in mathematical models. Compared to no screening over 35 years follow-up, age-based screening prevented the most deaths from prostate cancer (39,272, 95% uncertainty interval [UI]: 16,792-59,685) at the expense of 94,831 (95% UI: 84,827-105,630) overdiagnosed cancers. Age-based screening was the least cost-effective strategy studied. The greatest number of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) was generated by risk-based screening at a 10-year absolute risk threshold of 4%. At this threshold, risk-based screening led to one-third fewer overdiagnosed cancers (64,384, 95% UI: 57,382-72,050) but averted 6.3% fewer (9,695, 95% UI: 2,853-15,851) deaths from prostate cancer by comparison with age-based screening. Relative to no screening, risk-based screening at a 4% 10-year absolute risk threshold was cost-effective in 48.4% and 57.4% of the simulations at willingness-to-pay thresholds of GBP£20,000 (US$26,000) and £30,000 ($39,386) per QALY, respectively. The cost-effectiveness of risk-tailored screening improved as the threshold rose.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Based on the results of this modelling study, offering screening to men at higher risk could potentially reduce overdiagnosis and improve the benefit-harm tradeoff and the cost-effectiveness of a prostate cancer screening program. The optimal threshold will depend on societal judgements of the appropriate balance of benefits-harms and cost-effectiveness.https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002998&type=printable |
| spellingShingle | Tom Callender Mark Emberton Steve Morris Ros Eeles Ros Eeles Zsofia Kote-Jarai Paul D P Pharoah Nora Pashayan Polygenic risk-tailored screening for prostate cancer: A benefit-harm and cost-effectiveness modelling study. PLoS Medicine |
| title | Polygenic risk-tailored screening for prostate cancer: A benefit-harm and cost-effectiveness modelling study. |
| title_full | Polygenic risk-tailored screening for prostate cancer: A benefit-harm and cost-effectiveness modelling study. |
| title_fullStr | Polygenic risk-tailored screening for prostate cancer: A benefit-harm and cost-effectiveness modelling study. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Polygenic risk-tailored screening for prostate cancer: A benefit-harm and cost-effectiveness modelling study. |
| title_short | Polygenic risk-tailored screening for prostate cancer: A benefit-harm and cost-effectiveness modelling study. |
| title_sort | polygenic risk tailored screening for prostate cancer a benefit harm and cost effectiveness modelling study |
| url | https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002998&type=printable |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tomcallender polygenicrisktailoredscreeningforprostatecancerabenefitharmandcosteffectivenessmodellingstudy AT markemberton polygenicrisktailoredscreeningforprostatecancerabenefitharmandcosteffectivenessmodellingstudy AT stevemorris polygenicrisktailoredscreeningforprostatecancerabenefitharmandcosteffectivenessmodellingstudy AT roseeles polygenicrisktailoredscreeningforprostatecancerabenefitharmandcosteffectivenessmodellingstudy AT roseeles polygenicrisktailoredscreeningforprostatecancerabenefitharmandcosteffectivenessmodellingstudy AT zsofiakotejarai polygenicrisktailoredscreeningforprostatecancerabenefitharmandcosteffectivenessmodellingstudy AT pauldppharoah polygenicrisktailoredscreeningforprostatecancerabenefitharmandcosteffectivenessmodellingstudy AT norapashayan polygenicrisktailoredscreeningforprostatecancerabenefitharmandcosteffectivenessmodellingstudy |