Ice extent in sub-arctic fjords and coastal areas from 2001 to 2019 analyzed from MODIS imagery

Results examining variations in the ice extent along the Norwegian coastline based on the analysis of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) images from 2001 to 2019, February through May, are presented. A total of 386 fjords and coastal areas were outlined and grouped into ten region...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Megan O'Sadnick, Chris Petrich, Camilla Brekke, Jofrid Skarðhamar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2020-09-01
Series:Annals of Glaciology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0260305520000348/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811157320633155584
author Megan O'Sadnick
Chris Petrich
Camilla Brekke
Jofrid Skarðhamar
author_facet Megan O'Sadnick
Chris Petrich
Camilla Brekke
Jofrid Skarðhamar
author_sort Megan O'Sadnick
collection DOAJ
description Results examining variations in the ice extent along the Norwegian coastline based on the analysis of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) images from 2001 to 2019, February through May, are presented. A total of 386 fjords and coastal areas were outlined and grouped into ten regions to assess seasonal and long-term trends in ice extent. In addition, three fjords were examined to investigate how ice extent may vary over short distances (<100 km). Of the 386 outlined, 47 fjords/coastal areas held >5 km2 of ice at least once between 2001 and 2019. Over this span of time, no statistically significant trend in ice extent is found for all ten regions; however, variations between regions and years are evident. Ice extent is assessed through comparison to three weather variables – freezing degree days (FDD), daily new snowfall and daily freshwater supply from rainfall plus snowmelt. Six out of ten regions are significantly positively correlated (p < 0.05) to FDD. In addition, ice in two regions is significantly positively correlated to daily new snowfall, and in one region negatively correlated to rainfall plus snowmelt. The importance of fjord geometry and bathymetry as well as other weather variables including wind is discussed.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T05:04:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-de483935eeba47449f974d82070a6cdd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0260-3055
1727-5644
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T05:04:08Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Annals of Glaciology
spelling doaj.art-de483935eeba47449f974d82070a6cdd2023-03-09T12:27:41ZengCambridge University PressAnnals of Glaciology0260-30551727-56442020-09-016121022610.1017/aog.2020.34Ice extent in sub-arctic fjords and coastal areas from 2001 to 2019 analyzed from MODIS imageryMegan O'Sadnick0Chris Petrich1Camilla Brekke2Jofrid Skarðhamar3SINTEF Narvik, Narvik, Norway UiT – The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, NorwaySINTEF Narvik, Narvik, NorwayUiT – The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, NorwayInstitute of Marine Research, Tromsø, NorwayResults examining variations in the ice extent along the Norwegian coastline based on the analysis of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) images from 2001 to 2019, February through May, are presented. A total of 386 fjords and coastal areas were outlined and grouped into ten regions to assess seasonal and long-term trends in ice extent. In addition, three fjords were examined to investigate how ice extent may vary over short distances (<100 km). Of the 386 outlined, 47 fjords/coastal areas held >5 km2 of ice at least once between 2001 and 2019. Over this span of time, no statistically significant trend in ice extent is found for all ten regions; however, variations between regions and years are evident. Ice extent is assessed through comparison to three weather variables – freezing degree days (FDD), daily new snowfall and daily freshwater supply from rainfall plus snowmelt. Six out of ten regions are significantly positively correlated (p < 0.05) to FDD. In addition, ice in two regions is significantly positively correlated to daily new snowfall, and in one region negatively correlated to rainfall plus snowmelt. The importance of fjord geometry and bathymetry as well as other weather variables including wind is discussed.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0260305520000348/type/journal_articleIce/atmosphere interactionsremote sensingsea icesea-ice growth and decayice/ocean interactions
spellingShingle Megan O'Sadnick
Chris Petrich
Camilla Brekke
Jofrid Skarðhamar
Ice extent in sub-arctic fjords and coastal areas from 2001 to 2019 analyzed from MODIS imagery
Annals of Glaciology
Ice/atmosphere interactions
remote sensing
sea ice
sea-ice growth and decay
ice/ocean interactions
title Ice extent in sub-arctic fjords and coastal areas from 2001 to 2019 analyzed from MODIS imagery
title_full Ice extent in sub-arctic fjords and coastal areas from 2001 to 2019 analyzed from MODIS imagery
title_fullStr Ice extent in sub-arctic fjords and coastal areas from 2001 to 2019 analyzed from MODIS imagery
title_full_unstemmed Ice extent in sub-arctic fjords and coastal areas from 2001 to 2019 analyzed from MODIS imagery
title_short Ice extent in sub-arctic fjords and coastal areas from 2001 to 2019 analyzed from MODIS imagery
title_sort ice extent in sub arctic fjords and coastal areas from 2001 to 2019 analyzed from modis imagery
topic Ice/atmosphere interactions
remote sensing
sea ice
sea-ice growth and decay
ice/ocean interactions
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0260305520000348/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT meganosadnick iceextentinsubarcticfjordsandcoastalareasfrom2001to2019analyzedfrommodisimagery
AT chrispetrich iceextentinsubarcticfjordsandcoastalareasfrom2001to2019analyzedfrommodisimagery
AT camillabrekke iceextentinsubarcticfjordsandcoastalareasfrom2001to2019analyzedfrommodisimagery
AT jofridskarðhamar iceextentinsubarcticfjordsandcoastalareasfrom2001to2019analyzedfrommodisimagery