Montagnes frontalières des innovations à la marge

Mountain borders can be considered as « in-between spaces » for two reasons: at first, because they are localised on a border of two national territories and secondly because they have rural and specific characteristics. This « in-betweenness » is finally more an asset than a disability.Indeed, popu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lauranne Jacob
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: UMR 245 - CESSMA 2014-12-01
Series:Carnets de Géographes
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/cdg/403
_version_ 1811188757576024064
author Lauranne Jacob
author_facet Lauranne Jacob
author_sort Lauranne Jacob
collection DOAJ
description Mountain borders can be considered as « in-between spaces » for two reasons: at first, because they are localised on a border of two national territories and secondly because they have rural and specific characteristics. This « in-betweenness » is finally more an asset than a disability.Indeed, populations faced with new and highly specific constraints don’t have other alternatives than to innovate with the strengths of their territory and the tools and resources offered by national and European policies. The border is a legal discontinuity, which is strengthened by the mountain barrier. This new situation has specific consequences and involves special attention when considering mountain cross-border cooperation. This paper examines the role of “in-between spaces” in the Europe’s cohesion.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T14:24:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-de4e7ac50def465085016f658a097f54
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2107-7266
language fra
last_indexed 2024-04-11T14:24:58Z
publishDate 2014-12-01
publisher UMR 245 - CESSMA
record_format Article
series Carnets de Géographes
spelling doaj.art-de4e7ac50def465085016f658a097f542022-12-22T04:18:55ZfraUMR 245 - CESSMACarnets de Géographes2107-72662014-12-01710.4000/cdg.403Montagnes frontalières des innovations à la margeLauranne JacobMountain borders can be considered as « in-between spaces » for two reasons: at first, because they are localised on a border of two national territories and secondly because they have rural and specific characteristics. This « in-betweenness » is finally more an asset than a disability.Indeed, populations faced with new and highly specific constraints don’t have other alternatives than to innovate with the strengths of their territory and the tools and resources offered by national and European policies. The border is a legal discontinuity, which is strengthened by the mountain barrier. This new situation has specific consequences and involves special attention when considering mountain cross-border cooperation. This paper examines the role of “in-between spaces” in the Europe’s cohesion.http://journals.openedition.org/cdg/403MountainAlpsMarginBorder
spellingShingle Lauranne Jacob
Montagnes frontalières des innovations à la marge
Carnets de Géographes
Mountain
Alps
Margin
Border
title Montagnes frontalières des innovations à la marge
title_full Montagnes frontalières des innovations à la marge
title_fullStr Montagnes frontalières des innovations à la marge
title_full_unstemmed Montagnes frontalières des innovations à la marge
title_short Montagnes frontalières des innovations à la marge
title_sort montagnes frontalieres des innovations a la marge
topic Mountain
Alps
Margin
Border
url http://journals.openedition.org/cdg/403
work_keys_str_mv AT laurannejacob montagnesfrontalieresdesinnovationsalamarge