Montagnes frontalières des innovations à la marge
Mountain borders can be considered as « in-between spaces » for two reasons: at first, because they are localised on a border of two national territories and secondly because they have rural and specific characteristics. This « in-betweenness » is finally more an asset than a disability.Indeed, popu...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fra |
Published: |
UMR 245 - CESSMA
2014-12-01
|
Series: | Carnets de Géographes |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/cdg/403 |
_version_ | 1811188757576024064 |
---|---|
author | Lauranne Jacob |
author_facet | Lauranne Jacob |
author_sort | Lauranne Jacob |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Mountain borders can be considered as « in-between spaces » for two reasons: at first, because they are localised on a border of two national territories and secondly because they have rural and specific characteristics. This « in-betweenness » is finally more an asset than a disability.Indeed, populations faced with new and highly specific constraints don’t have other alternatives than to innovate with the strengths of their territory and the tools and resources offered by national and European policies. The border is a legal discontinuity, which is strengthened by the mountain barrier. This new situation has specific consequences and involves special attention when considering mountain cross-border cooperation. This paper examines the role of “in-between spaces” in the Europe’s cohesion. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T14:24:58Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-de4e7ac50def465085016f658a097f54 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2107-7266 |
language | fra |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T14:24:58Z |
publishDate | 2014-12-01 |
publisher | UMR 245 - CESSMA |
record_format | Article |
series | Carnets de Géographes |
spelling | doaj.art-de4e7ac50def465085016f658a097f542022-12-22T04:18:55ZfraUMR 245 - CESSMACarnets de Géographes2107-72662014-12-01710.4000/cdg.403Montagnes frontalières des innovations à la margeLauranne JacobMountain borders can be considered as « in-between spaces » for two reasons: at first, because they are localised on a border of two national territories and secondly because they have rural and specific characteristics. This « in-betweenness » is finally more an asset than a disability.Indeed, populations faced with new and highly specific constraints don’t have other alternatives than to innovate with the strengths of their territory and the tools and resources offered by national and European policies. The border is a legal discontinuity, which is strengthened by the mountain barrier. This new situation has specific consequences and involves special attention when considering mountain cross-border cooperation. This paper examines the role of “in-between spaces” in the Europe’s cohesion.http://journals.openedition.org/cdg/403MountainAlpsMarginBorder |
spellingShingle | Lauranne Jacob Montagnes frontalières des innovations à la marge Carnets de Géographes Mountain Alps Margin Border |
title | Montagnes frontalières des innovations à la marge |
title_full | Montagnes frontalières des innovations à la marge |
title_fullStr | Montagnes frontalières des innovations à la marge |
title_full_unstemmed | Montagnes frontalières des innovations à la marge |
title_short | Montagnes frontalières des innovations à la marge |
title_sort | montagnes frontalieres des innovations a la marge |
topic | Mountain Alps Margin Border |
url | http://journals.openedition.org/cdg/403 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laurannejacob montagnesfrontalieresdesinnovationsalamarge |