Protein-protein binding supersites.

The lack of a deep understanding of how proteins interact remains an important roadblock in advancing efforts to identify binding partners and uncover the corresponding regulatory mechanisms of the functions they mediate. Understanding protein-protein interactions is also essential for designing spe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raji Viswanathan, Eduardo Fajardo, Gabriel Steinberg, Matthew Haller, Andras Fiser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006704
_version_ 1818516670248910848
author Raji Viswanathan
Eduardo Fajardo
Gabriel Steinberg
Matthew Haller
Andras Fiser
author_facet Raji Viswanathan
Eduardo Fajardo
Gabriel Steinberg
Matthew Haller
Andras Fiser
author_sort Raji Viswanathan
collection DOAJ
description The lack of a deep understanding of how proteins interact remains an important roadblock in advancing efforts to identify binding partners and uncover the corresponding regulatory mechanisms of the functions they mediate. Understanding protein-protein interactions is also essential for designing specific chemical modifications to develop new reagents and therapeutics. We explored the hypothesis of whether protein interaction sites serve as generic biding sites for non-cognate protein ligands, just as it has been observed for small-molecule-binding sites in the past. Using extensive computational docking experiments on a test set of 241 protein complexes, we found that indeed there is a strong preference for non-cognate ligands to bind to the cognate binding site of a receptor. This observation appears to be robust to variations in docking programs, types of non-cognate protein probes, sizes of binding patches, relative sizes of binding patches and full-length proteins, and the exploration of obligate and non-obligate complexes. The accuracy of the docking scoring function appears to play a role in defining the correct site. The frequency of interaction of unrelated probes recognizing the binding interface was utilized in a simple prediction algorithm that showed accuracy competitive with other state of the art methods.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T00:45:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-de5ca3523ca14cd9a4c4f0a3f0032247
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T00:45:19Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Computational Biology
spelling doaj.art-de5ca3523ca14cd9a4c4f0a3f00322472022-12-22T01:26:48ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582019-01-01151e100670410.1371/journal.pcbi.1006704Protein-protein binding supersites.Raji ViswanathanEduardo FajardoGabriel SteinbergMatthew HallerAndras FiserThe lack of a deep understanding of how proteins interact remains an important roadblock in advancing efforts to identify binding partners and uncover the corresponding regulatory mechanisms of the functions they mediate. Understanding protein-protein interactions is also essential for designing specific chemical modifications to develop new reagents and therapeutics. We explored the hypothesis of whether protein interaction sites serve as generic biding sites for non-cognate protein ligands, just as it has been observed for small-molecule-binding sites in the past. Using extensive computational docking experiments on a test set of 241 protein complexes, we found that indeed there is a strong preference for non-cognate ligands to bind to the cognate binding site of a receptor. This observation appears to be robust to variations in docking programs, types of non-cognate protein probes, sizes of binding patches, relative sizes of binding patches and full-length proteins, and the exploration of obligate and non-obligate complexes. The accuracy of the docking scoring function appears to play a role in defining the correct site. The frequency of interaction of unrelated probes recognizing the binding interface was utilized in a simple prediction algorithm that showed accuracy competitive with other state of the art methods.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006704
spellingShingle Raji Viswanathan
Eduardo Fajardo
Gabriel Steinberg
Matthew Haller
Andras Fiser
Protein-protein binding supersites.
PLoS Computational Biology
title Protein-protein binding supersites.
title_full Protein-protein binding supersites.
title_fullStr Protein-protein binding supersites.
title_full_unstemmed Protein-protein binding supersites.
title_short Protein-protein binding supersites.
title_sort protein protein binding supersites
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006704
work_keys_str_mv AT rajiviswanathan proteinproteinbindingsupersites
AT eduardofajardo proteinproteinbindingsupersites
AT gabrielsteinberg proteinproteinbindingsupersites
AT matthewhaller proteinproteinbindingsupersites
AT andrasfiser proteinproteinbindingsupersites