On the stability of nanofluid ice slurry produced via impinging stream method under thermal and phase-change cycles

Nanofluid ice slurry has shown promising potential due to superior heat transfer and lower supercooling degree. The stability of the nanofluid ice slurry is of paramount importance to ensure high performance for practical applications. This study evaluates the stability (flow and thermal properties)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuguo Gao, Jiaqi Luo, Fu Fang, Minghan Xu, Mohammaderfan Mohit, Tariq Shamim, Agus P. Sasmito
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-12-01
Series:Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X23010316
_version_ 1797422603486363648
author Yuguo Gao
Jiaqi Luo
Fu Fang
Minghan Xu
Mohammaderfan Mohit
Tariq Shamim
Agus P. Sasmito
author_facet Yuguo Gao
Jiaqi Luo
Fu Fang
Minghan Xu
Mohammaderfan Mohit
Tariq Shamim
Agus P. Sasmito
author_sort Yuguo Gao
collection DOAJ
description Nanofluid ice slurry has shown promising potential due to superior heat transfer and lower supercooling degree. The stability of the nanofluid ice slurry is of paramount importance to ensure high performance for practical applications. This study evaluates the stability (flow and thermal properties) of nanofluid ice slurry produced via a dynamic, impinging-stream method and compares with its conventional counterpart, i.e., the static, non-impinging-steam approach. Thermal cycling (heating–cooling) with phase change (freezing-thawing) cycles were carried out to measure absorbance, thermal conductivity, and viscosity. The results showed that when using the method of producing nanofluid ice slurry by impinging flow, nanofluid ice slurry with concentrations of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 w.t.% decreased in absorbance by 17%, 21%, and 26%, in thermal conductivity by 0.5%, 1.4%, and 2.17%, and in viscosity by 3.6%, 5.3%, and 10.4%, respectively, after nine freezing and thawing cycles. Additionally, for instance, for a nanofluid with a concentration of 0.2 w.t%, after 9 phase change cycles, the decrease in absorbance of the nanofluid solution using dynamic cycling was 7.1, 3.7, and 1.6 times higher than that of static cycling with an IPF of 25%, 50%, and 75%, respectively (thermal conductivity 4.1, 2.4, and 1.4 times; viscosity 2.8, 1.8, and 1.3 times). Higher nanoparticle concentration reduces the stability of the nanofluid ice slurry; the degree of reduction is first increased and then stabilized after six cycles. It was found that the dynamic method had an impact on the stability of the nanofluid compared with the static approach. Furthermore, empirical correlations were developed to predict the thermophysical properties based on phase-change cycles for practical applications.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T07:34:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-de60f1e524594be4949fbd601dda51f8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2214-157X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T07:34:43Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
spelling doaj.art-de60f1e524594be4949fbd601dda51f82023-12-03T05:41:28ZengElsevierCase Studies in Thermal Engineering2214-157X2023-12-0152103725On the stability of nanofluid ice slurry produced via impinging stream method under thermal and phase-change cyclesYuguo Gao0Jiaqi Luo1Fu Fang2Minghan Xu3Mohammaderfan Mohit4Tariq Shamim5Agus P. Sasmito6Henan International Joint Laboratory of Thermo-Fluid Electro-Chemical System for New Energy Vehicle, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, Henan 450045, China; Department of Mining and Materials Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A0E8, Canada; Corresponding author.Henan International Joint Laboratory of Thermo-Fluid Electro-Chemical System for New Energy Vehicle, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, Henan 450045, ChinaHenan International Joint Laboratory of Thermo-Fluid Electro-Chemical System for New Energy Vehicle, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, Henan 450045, ChinaDepartment of Mining and Materials Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A0E8, CanadaDepartment of Mining and Materials Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A0E8, CanadaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115, United StatesDepartment of Mining and Materials Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A0E8, Canada; Henan International Joint Laboratory of Thermo-Fluid Electro-Chemical System for New Energy Vehicle, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, Henan 450045, China; Corresponding author at: Department of Mining and Materials Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A0E8, Canada.Nanofluid ice slurry has shown promising potential due to superior heat transfer and lower supercooling degree. The stability of the nanofluid ice slurry is of paramount importance to ensure high performance for practical applications. This study evaluates the stability (flow and thermal properties) of nanofluid ice slurry produced via a dynamic, impinging-stream method and compares with its conventional counterpart, i.e., the static, non-impinging-steam approach. Thermal cycling (heating–cooling) with phase change (freezing-thawing) cycles were carried out to measure absorbance, thermal conductivity, and viscosity. The results showed that when using the method of producing nanofluid ice slurry by impinging flow, nanofluid ice slurry with concentrations of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 w.t.% decreased in absorbance by 17%, 21%, and 26%, in thermal conductivity by 0.5%, 1.4%, and 2.17%, and in viscosity by 3.6%, 5.3%, and 10.4%, respectively, after nine freezing and thawing cycles. Additionally, for instance, for a nanofluid with a concentration of 0.2 w.t%, after 9 phase change cycles, the decrease in absorbance of the nanofluid solution using dynamic cycling was 7.1, 3.7, and 1.6 times higher than that of static cycling with an IPF of 25%, 50%, and 75%, respectively (thermal conductivity 4.1, 2.4, and 1.4 times; viscosity 2.8, 1.8, and 1.3 times). Higher nanoparticle concentration reduces the stability of the nanofluid ice slurry; the degree of reduction is first increased and then stabilized after six cycles. It was found that the dynamic method had an impact on the stability of the nanofluid compared with the static approach. Furthermore, empirical correlations were developed to predict the thermophysical properties based on phase-change cycles for practical applications.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X23010316Impinging streamIce slurryLong-term phase change cyclingNanofluidThermal energy storage
spellingShingle Yuguo Gao
Jiaqi Luo
Fu Fang
Minghan Xu
Mohammaderfan Mohit
Tariq Shamim
Agus P. Sasmito
On the stability of nanofluid ice slurry produced via impinging stream method under thermal and phase-change cycles
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Impinging stream
Ice slurry
Long-term phase change cycling
Nanofluid
Thermal energy storage
title On the stability of nanofluid ice slurry produced via impinging stream method under thermal and phase-change cycles
title_full On the stability of nanofluid ice slurry produced via impinging stream method under thermal and phase-change cycles
title_fullStr On the stability of nanofluid ice slurry produced via impinging stream method under thermal and phase-change cycles
title_full_unstemmed On the stability of nanofluid ice slurry produced via impinging stream method under thermal and phase-change cycles
title_short On the stability of nanofluid ice slurry produced via impinging stream method under thermal and phase-change cycles
title_sort on the stability of nanofluid ice slurry produced via impinging stream method under thermal and phase change cycles
topic Impinging stream
Ice slurry
Long-term phase change cycling
Nanofluid
Thermal energy storage
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X23010316
work_keys_str_mv AT yuguogao onthestabilityofnanofluidiceslurryproducedviaimpingingstreammethodunderthermalandphasechangecycles
AT jiaqiluo onthestabilityofnanofluidiceslurryproducedviaimpingingstreammethodunderthermalandphasechangecycles
AT fufang onthestabilityofnanofluidiceslurryproducedviaimpingingstreammethodunderthermalandphasechangecycles
AT minghanxu onthestabilityofnanofluidiceslurryproducedviaimpingingstreammethodunderthermalandphasechangecycles
AT mohammaderfanmohit onthestabilityofnanofluidiceslurryproducedviaimpingingstreammethodunderthermalandphasechangecycles
AT tariqshamim onthestabilityofnanofluidiceslurryproducedviaimpingingstreammethodunderthermalandphasechangecycles
AT aguspsasmito onthestabilityofnanofluidiceslurryproducedviaimpingingstreammethodunderthermalandphasechangecycles