2.6 BLOOD PRESSURE-INDEPENDENCE OF AORTIC-TO-BRACHIAL ARTERY STIFFNESS RATIO IS DEPENDENT ON DISEASE STATUS

Introduction: Aortic stiffness predicts cardiovascular mortality but is limited as a risk marker because it is dependent on blood pressure (BP). A potential solution is provided from the ratio of aortic-to-brachial artery stiffness (ab-ratio), which is purported to be a BP-independent risk marker am...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew K. Armstrong, Martin G. Schultz, Dean S. Picone, James E. Sharman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-12-01
Series:Artery Research
Online Access:https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930209/view
_version_ 1818006373011554304
author Matthew K. Armstrong
Martin G. Schultz
Dean S. Picone
James E. Sharman
author_facet Matthew K. Armstrong
Martin G. Schultz
Dean S. Picone
James E. Sharman
author_sort Matthew K. Armstrong
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Aortic stiffness predicts cardiovascular mortality but is limited as a risk marker because it is dependent on blood pressure (BP). A potential solution is provided from the ratio of aortic-to-brachial artery stiffness (ab-ratio), which is purported to be a BP-independent risk marker among patients with renal dysfunction (RD). We sought to determine the BP-independence of the ab-ratio in patients with disease (including RD) and healthy populations. Methods: The ab-ratio (aortic/brachial pulse wave velocity; PWV) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded in patients with RD (n = 119, aged 65 ± 7 years), hypertension (n = 140, aged 62 ± 9 years), type 2 diabetes (n = 77, aged 60 ± 9 years) and healthy individuals (n = 99, aged 51 ± 8 years). Multiple-regression analysis was performed to test the independent association of MAP with the ab-ratio adjusted for age, sex, body-mass index and blood glucose. Results: There was no significant relationship between the ab-ratio and MAP in patients with RD (β = 0.002, 95% CI 0.002, 0.006, p = 0.34), hypertension (β = 0.001, 95% CI 0.003, 0.006, p = 0.62) or diabetes (β = 0.006, 95% CI 0.002, 0.014, p = 0.11). However, in healthy individuals the ab-ratio was significantly and independently associated with MAP (β = 0.008, 95% CI 0.003, 0.013, p = 0.003). There was a significant difference in the strength of association between the ab-ratio and MAP between patients with disease and healthy individuals (z > 2.2, p < 0.05 for all). Conclusion: Although ab-ratio is purported to be a risk marker that is independent of BP, this was observed only among patient populations, and not in healthy individuals. Therefore, the ab-ratio is influenced by disease status and may have restricted value as a BP-independent risk marker.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T05:00:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-de60fb844f5a49e6840263f7dff47af1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1876-4401
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T05:00:11Z
publishDate 2017-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Artery Research
spelling doaj.art-de60fb844f5a49e6840263f7dff47af12022-12-22T02:11:00ZengBMCArtery Research1876-44012017-12-012010.1016/j.artres.2017.10.0282.6 BLOOD PRESSURE-INDEPENDENCE OF AORTIC-TO-BRACHIAL ARTERY STIFFNESS RATIO IS DEPENDENT ON DISEASE STATUSMatthew K. ArmstrongMartin G. SchultzDean S. PiconeJames E. SharmanIntroduction: Aortic stiffness predicts cardiovascular mortality but is limited as a risk marker because it is dependent on blood pressure (BP). A potential solution is provided from the ratio of aortic-to-brachial artery stiffness (ab-ratio), which is purported to be a BP-independent risk marker among patients with renal dysfunction (RD). We sought to determine the BP-independence of the ab-ratio in patients with disease (including RD) and healthy populations. Methods: The ab-ratio (aortic/brachial pulse wave velocity; PWV) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded in patients with RD (n = 119, aged 65 ± 7 years), hypertension (n = 140, aged 62 ± 9 years), type 2 diabetes (n = 77, aged 60 ± 9 years) and healthy individuals (n = 99, aged 51 ± 8 years). Multiple-regression analysis was performed to test the independent association of MAP with the ab-ratio adjusted for age, sex, body-mass index and blood glucose. Results: There was no significant relationship between the ab-ratio and MAP in patients with RD (β = 0.002, 95% CI 0.002, 0.006, p = 0.34), hypertension (β = 0.001, 95% CI 0.003, 0.006, p = 0.62) or diabetes (β = 0.006, 95% CI 0.002, 0.014, p = 0.11). However, in healthy individuals the ab-ratio was significantly and independently associated with MAP (β = 0.008, 95% CI 0.003, 0.013, p = 0.003). There was a significant difference in the strength of association between the ab-ratio and MAP between patients with disease and healthy individuals (z > 2.2, p < 0.05 for all). Conclusion: Although ab-ratio is purported to be a risk marker that is independent of BP, this was observed only among patient populations, and not in healthy individuals. Therefore, the ab-ratio is influenced by disease status and may have restricted value as a BP-independent risk marker.https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930209/view
spellingShingle Matthew K. Armstrong
Martin G. Schultz
Dean S. Picone
James E. Sharman
2.6 BLOOD PRESSURE-INDEPENDENCE OF AORTIC-TO-BRACHIAL ARTERY STIFFNESS RATIO IS DEPENDENT ON DISEASE STATUS
Artery Research
title 2.6 BLOOD PRESSURE-INDEPENDENCE OF AORTIC-TO-BRACHIAL ARTERY STIFFNESS RATIO IS DEPENDENT ON DISEASE STATUS
title_full 2.6 BLOOD PRESSURE-INDEPENDENCE OF AORTIC-TO-BRACHIAL ARTERY STIFFNESS RATIO IS DEPENDENT ON DISEASE STATUS
title_fullStr 2.6 BLOOD PRESSURE-INDEPENDENCE OF AORTIC-TO-BRACHIAL ARTERY STIFFNESS RATIO IS DEPENDENT ON DISEASE STATUS
title_full_unstemmed 2.6 BLOOD PRESSURE-INDEPENDENCE OF AORTIC-TO-BRACHIAL ARTERY STIFFNESS RATIO IS DEPENDENT ON DISEASE STATUS
title_short 2.6 BLOOD PRESSURE-INDEPENDENCE OF AORTIC-TO-BRACHIAL ARTERY STIFFNESS RATIO IS DEPENDENT ON DISEASE STATUS
title_sort 2 6 blood pressure independence of aortic to brachial artery stiffness ratio is dependent on disease status
url https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930209/view
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewkarmstrong 26bloodpressureindependenceofaortictobrachialarterystiffnessratioisdependentondiseasestatus
AT martingschultz 26bloodpressureindependenceofaortictobrachialarterystiffnessratioisdependentondiseasestatus
AT deanspicone 26bloodpressureindependenceofaortictobrachialarterystiffnessratioisdependentondiseasestatus
AT jamesesharman 26bloodpressureindependenceofaortictobrachialarterystiffnessratioisdependentondiseasestatus