METAVERSE: MODEL CRIMINAL CODE
The Scientific and Technical Revolution 5.0 and WEB 3.0 technologies create conditions for the renovation of various forms of social relations with the use of virtual and augmented reality technologies in the metaverse. According to the proposed theory, the legal regulation of social relations in th...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Izdevnieciba “Baltija Publishing”
2023-11-01
|
| Series: | Baltic Journal of Economic Studies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/2211 |
| _version_ | 1797369692898197504 |
|---|---|
| author | Oleksii Kostenko Dmytro Zhuravlov Oleksii Dniprov Oksana Korotiuk |
| author_facet | Oleksii Kostenko Dmytro Zhuravlov Oleksii Dniprov Oksana Korotiuk |
| author_sort | Oleksii Kostenko |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The Scientific and Technical Revolution 5.0 and WEB 3.0 technologies create conditions for the renovation of various forms of social relations with the use of virtual and augmented reality technologies in the metaverse. According to the proposed theory, the legal regulation of social relations in the metaverse requires the development of a comprehensive electronic jurisdiction based on the latest basic legislation. The formation of legal regulation of the metaverse is a prerequisite for the need to form an electronic jurisdiction of the metaverse, which will include sectoral Metaverse Codes. The metaverse, as the electronic society of the future, does not yet have clear legal boundaries, and the task of scholars is to predict and outline with sufficient certainty the future contours of legal authority for virtual environments. Today, discussions in the scientific community about the feasibility and necessity of legal regulation of the metaverse often revolve around several key issues. First, there is the question of what legal framework should be applied in the metaverse and how conflicts between different legal systems should be resolved. Second, there is a debate about whether current regulatory bodies in the physical world have the capacity to effectively regulate the metaverse through existing laws and regulations. Third, there is the question of how to deal with offences committed in the virtual environment, and whether they should be dealt with under existing tort or criminal law, or whether a separate cross-border electronic jurisdiction should be created. The regulation of social relations in the metaverse should focus on one central goal: to clearly define the status of electronic entities, subjects and objects, to establish their rights, duties and responsibilities, and to define the different types of relations between virtual entities, subjects and objects within a given metaverse, as well as between different metaverses within an electronic jurisdiction and in a cross-border context. An essential component of the Metaverse Electronic Jurisdiction is a Metaverse Model Criminal Code that will outline the norms and offences applicable to analogue, hybrid and electronic jurisdictions. This code will define the types of socially harmful acts or crimes and the corresponding criminal penalties that will be applied within the metaverse. The formation of the electronic jurisdiction of the metaverse and the development of a Metaverse Model Criminal Code is a current scientific and legal issue. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T17:50:31Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-de68b06912e44da49cad60d334dfaa80 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2256-0742 2256-0963 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T17:50:31Z |
| publishDate | 2023-11-01 |
| publisher | Izdevnieciba “Baltija Publishing” |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Baltic Journal of Economic Studies |
| spelling | doaj.art-de68b06912e44da49cad60d334dfaa802024-01-02T08:49:46ZengIzdevnieciba “Baltija Publishing”Baltic Journal of Economic Studies2256-07422256-09632023-11-019413414710.30525/2256-0742/2023-9-4-134-1472211METAVERSE: MODEL CRIMINAL CODEOleksii Kostenko0Dmytro Zhuravlov1Oleksii Dniprov2Oksana Korotiuk3State Scientific Institution "Institute of Information, Security and Law of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine", Ukraine (corresponding author)Office of the President of Ukraine, UkraineOffice of the President of Ukraine, UkraineState Tax University, UkraineThe Scientific and Technical Revolution 5.0 and WEB 3.0 technologies create conditions for the renovation of various forms of social relations with the use of virtual and augmented reality technologies in the metaverse. According to the proposed theory, the legal regulation of social relations in the metaverse requires the development of a comprehensive electronic jurisdiction based on the latest basic legislation. The formation of legal regulation of the metaverse is a prerequisite for the need to form an electronic jurisdiction of the metaverse, which will include sectoral Metaverse Codes. The metaverse, as the electronic society of the future, does not yet have clear legal boundaries, and the task of scholars is to predict and outline with sufficient certainty the future contours of legal authority for virtual environments. Today, discussions in the scientific community about the feasibility and necessity of legal regulation of the metaverse often revolve around several key issues. First, there is the question of what legal framework should be applied in the metaverse and how conflicts between different legal systems should be resolved. Second, there is a debate about whether current regulatory bodies in the physical world have the capacity to effectively regulate the metaverse through existing laws and regulations. Third, there is the question of how to deal with offences committed in the virtual environment, and whether they should be dealt with under existing tort or criminal law, or whether a separate cross-border electronic jurisdiction should be created. The regulation of social relations in the metaverse should focus on one central goal: to clearly define the status of electronic entities, subjects and objects, to establish their rights, duties and responsibilities, and to define the different types of relations between virtual entities, subjects and objects within a given metaverse, as well as between different metaverses within an electronic jurisdiction and in a cross-border context. An essential component of the Metaverse Electronic Jurisdiction is a Metaverse Model Criminal Code that will outline the norms and offences applicable to analogue, hybrid and electronic jurisdictions. This code will define the types of socially harmful acts or crimes and the corresponding criminal penalties that will be applied within the metaverse. The formation of the electronic jurisdiction of the metaverse and the development of a Metaverse Model Criminal Code is a current scientific and legal issue.http://baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/2211metaversemetaverse electronic jurisdictionmetaverse criminal codeavatarelectronic personalityelectronic humanoididentification datablockchain,aicryptocurrencyvirtual objectsownership of virtual objectsintellectual propertycybercrimevirtual crimelegal regulation of the metaverse |
| spellingShingle | Oleksii Kostenko Dmytro Zhuravlov Oleksii Dniprov Oksana Korotiuk METAVERSE: MODEL CRIMINAL CODE Baltic Journal of Economic Studies metaverse metaverse electronic jurisdiction metaverse criminal code avatar electronic personality electronic humanoid identification data blockchain, ai cryptocurrency virtual objects ownership of virtual objects intellectual property cybercrime virtual crime legal regulation of the metaverse |
| title | METAVERSE: MODEL CRIMINAL CODE |
| title_full | METAVERSE: MODEL CRIMINAL CODE |
| title_fullStr | METAVERSE: MODEL CRIMINAL CODE |
| title_full_unstemmed | METAVERSE: MODEL CRIMINAL CODE |
| title_short | METAVERSE: MODEL CRIMINAL CODE |
| title_sort | metaverse model criminal code |
| topic | metaverse metaverse electronic jurisdiction metaverse criminal code avatar electronic personality electronic humanoid identification data blockchain, ai cryptocurrency virtual objects ownership of virtual objects intellectual property cybercrime virtual crime legal regulation of the metaverse |
| url | http://baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/2211 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT oleksiikostenko metaversemodelcriminalcode AT dmytrozhuravlov metaversemodelcriminalcode AT oleksiidniprov metaversemodelcriminalcode AT oksanakorotiuk metaversemodelcriminalcode |