Critical sociology in the development of HOTS-oriented cognitive assessment instruments

The current curriculum focuses on three domains, one of which is cognitive. Cognitive abilities are very important for the development of individual competencies so that instruments to measure them must be carried out. High quality cognitive instruments are needed in the assessment. Assessment with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aris Martiana, Edi Istiyono, Widihastuti Widihastuti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta 2022-10-01
Series:Journal of Social Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jss/article/view/51430
_version_ 1811325503830753280
author Aris Martiana
Edi Istiyono
Widihastuti Widihastuti
author_facet Aris Martiana
Edi Istiyono
Widihastuti Widihastuti
author_sort Aris Martiana
collection DOAJ
description The current curriculum focuses on three domains, one of which is cognitive. Cognitive abilities are very important for the development of individual competencies so that instruments to measure them must be carried out. High quality cognitive instruments are needed in the assessment. Assessment with High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) orientation as an effort to implement 6c, namely communication, collaboration, critical thinking, creative thinking, also computational logic and concern by developing cognitive instruments in Sociology scientific assessment. The method used is Research and Development which is focused on development. Cognitive instruments were compiled and carried out content validity from 4 experts for Sociology, Education and Law which were then tested on 93 students through a questionnaire in the form of google form. Analysis of the data used is by using software iteman 4.3. The results of this study are cognitive instruments with 15 HOTS questions in the form of multiple choice using content validity with Aiken's count obtained a score of 0.75 to 0.9375 so it is included in the medium and high categories. The instrument has an Alpha score of 0.558 so it is included in the reliable category. For items that have a difficulty level of 0.637, it means that the difficulty of the questions is moderate and the positive discriminatory power with a number of 0.243 is in the medium category. Then the distractor on the answer choices in the question items can function well because most of them are 0.05.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T14:34:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-de6ada29645c4e48b2cf464ab58d60fc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1858-2656
2721-4036
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T14:34:20Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
record_format Article
series Journal of Social Studies
spelling doaj.art-de6ada29645c4e48b2cf464ab58d60fc2022-12-22T02:43:05ZengUniversitas Negeri YogyakartaJournal of Social Studies1858-26562721-40362022-10-0118219720610.21831/jss.v18i2.5143017222Critical sociology in the development of HOTS-oriented cognitive assessment instrumentsAris Martiana0Edi Istiyono1Widihastuti Widihastuti2Universitas Negeri YogyakartaUniversitas Negeri YogyakartaUniversitas Negeri YogyakartaThe current curriculum focuses on three domains, one of which is cognitive. Cognitive abilities are very important for the development of individual competencies so that instruments to measure them must be carried out. High quality cognitive instruments are needed in the assessment. Assessment with High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) orientation as an effort to implement 6c, namely communication, collaboration, critical thinking, creative thinking, also computational logic and concern by developing cognitive instruments in Sociology scientific assessment. The method used is Research and Development which is focused on development. Cognitive instruments were compiled and carried out content validity from 4 experts for Sociology, Education and Law which were then tested on 93 students through a questionnaire in the form of google form. Analysis of the data used is by using software iteman 4.3. The results of this study are cognitive instruments with 15 HOTS questions in the form of multiple choice using content validity with Aiken's count obtained a score of 0.75 to 0.9375 so it is included in the medium and high categories. The instrument has an Alpha score of 0.558 so it is included in the reliable category. For items that have a difficulty level of 0.637, it means that the difficulty of the questions is moderate and the positive discriminatory power with a number of 0.243 is in the medium category. Then the distractor on the answer choices in the question items can function well because most of them are 0.05.https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jss/article/view/51430development, cognitive instruments, hots, sociology
spellingShingle Aris Martiana
Edi Istiyono
Widihastuti Widihastuti
Critical sociology in the development of HOTS-oriented cognitive assessment instruments
Journal of Social Studies
development, cognitive instruments, hots, sociology
title Critical sociology in the development of HOTS-oriented cognitive assessment instruments
title_full Critical sociology in the development of HOTS-oriented cognitive assessment instruments
title_fullStr Critical sociology in the development of HOTS-oriented cognitive assessment instruments
title_full_unstemmed Critical sociology in the development of HOTS-oriented cognitive assessment instruments
title_short Critical sociology in the development of HOTS-oriented cognitive assessment instruments
title_sort critical sociology in the development of hots oriented cognitive assessment instruments
topic development, cognitive instruments, hots, sociology
url https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jss/article/view/51430
work_keys_str_mv AT arismartiana criticalsociologyinthedevelopmentofhotsorientedcognitiveassessmentinstruments
AT ediistiyono criticalsociologyinthedevelopmentofhotsorientedcognitiveassessmentinstruments
AT widihastutiwidihastuti criticalsociologyinthedevelopmentofhotsorientedcognitiveassessmentinstruments