Structuralism and Deconstruction in Biblical Scholarship: Annotated Bibliographies
Academic referencing, though very significant in scholarship, has not been an easy task for both students and researchers, especially when one is restricted to following a particular referencing style either as instructed by one’s educational institution or by a publishing house through which one se...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Noyam Journals
2024-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Mother-Tongue Biblical Hermeneutics and Theology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://noyam.org/motbit2024611/ |
_version_ | 1797257086095065088 |
---|---|
author | Ernest Jnr Frimpong Jonathan Edward Tetteh Kuwornu Adjaottor |
author_facet | Ernest Jnr Frimpong Jonathan Edward Tetteh Kuwornu Adjaottor |
author_sort | Ernest Jnr Frimpong |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Academic referencing, though very significant in scholarship, has not been an easy task for both students and researchers, especially when one is restricted to following a particular referencing style either as instructed by one’s educational institution or by a publishing house through which one seeks a publication. In biblical scholarship, the philosophies of structuralism and deconstruction are very significant, especially as much as textual translation and interpretation are concerned. Several proponents have shared their scholarly views on how they individually appreciate these philosophical concepts. In an attempt to unravel some of such works without neglecting the authors and their central discussions, this paper employed a methodology through the construction of annotated bibliographies of such works. Findings indicated that while structuralism mainly studies the meaning of a text independently of its history and culture, deconstruction considers the world of the audience in line with the author’s intention and how that intention could be relevant to the new audience, taking into account the history of the text and the culture of the audience. Also, some of the key proponents of structuralism and its philosophical development include de Saussure, Levi-Strauss, Sasková and Titchener. Key proponents of deconstruction include Derrida, Norris, Ekem, Kuwornu-Adjaottor, Mugambi, and Nida. Significantly, with a maximum word count of 150 words and not less than 50 words, readers would understand key information contained in the sampled works of the authors through the annotations. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-24T22:32:02Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-de7cbac130164aaba52d7d29928907b9 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2676-2838 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-24T22:32:02Z |
publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
publisher | Noyam Journals |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Mother-Tongue Biblical Hermeneutics and Theology |
spelling | doaj.art-de7cbac130164aaba52d7d29928907b92024-03-19T18:19:40ZengNoyam JournalsJournal of Mother-Tongue Biblical Hermeneutics and Theology2676-28382024-01-016118https://doi.org/10.38159/motbit.2024611Structuralism and Deconstruction in Biblical Scholarship: Annotated BibliographiesErnest Jnr Frimpong0https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7642-3224Jonathan Edward Tetteh Kuwornu Adjaottor1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0320-0983Department of Religious Studies, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, GhanaDepartment of Religious Studies, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, GhanaAcademic referencing, though very significant in scholarship, has not been an easy task for both students and researchers, especially when one is restricted to following a particular referencing style either as instructed by one’s educational institution or by a publishing house through which one seeks a publication. In biblical scholarship, the philosophies of structuralism and deconstruction are very significant, especially as much as textual translation and interpretation are concerned. Several proponents have shared their scholarly views on how they individually appreciate these philosophical concepts. In an attempt to unravel some of such works without neglecting the authors and their central discussions, this paper employed a methodology through the construction of annotated bibliographies of such works. Findings indicated that while structuralism mainly studies the meaning of a text independently of its history and culture, deconstruction considers the world of the audience in line with the author’s intention and how that intention could be relevant to the new audience, taking into account the history of the text and the culture of the audience. Also, some of the key proponents of structuralism and its philosophical development include de Saussure, Levi-Strauss, Sasková and Titchener. Key proponents of deconstruction include Derrida, Norris, Ekem, Kuwornu-Adjaottor, Mugambi, and Nida. Significantly, with a maximum word count of 150 words and not less than 50 words, readers would understand key information contained in the sampled works of the authors through the annotations.https://noyam.org/motbit2024611/referencingannotated bibliographystructuralismdeconstruction |
spellingShingle | Ernest Jnr Frimpong Jonathan Edward Tetteh Kuwornu Adjaottor Structuralism and Deconstruction in Biblical Scholarship: Annotated Bibliographies Journal of Mother-Tongue Biblical Hermeneutics and Theology referencing annotated bibliography structuralism deconstruction |
title | Structuralism and Deconstruction in Biblical Scholarship: Annotated Bibliographies |
title_full | Structuralism and Deconstruction in Biblical Scholarship: Annotated Bibliographies |
title_fullStr | Structuralism and Deconstruction in Biblical Scholarship: Annotated Bibliographies |
title_full_unstemmed | Structuralism and Deconstruction in Biblical Scholarship: Annotated Bibliographies |
title_short | Structuralism and Deconstruction in Biblical Scholarship: Annotated Bibliographies |
title_sort | structuralism and deconstruction in biblical scholarship annotated bibliographies |
topic | referencing annotated bibliography structuralism deconstruction |
url | https://noyam.org/motbit2024611/ |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ernestjnrfrimpong structuralismanddeconstructioninbiblicalscholarshipannotatedbibliographies AT jonathanedwardtettehkuwornuadjaottor structuralismanddeconstructioninbiblicalscholarshipannotatedbibliographies |