Ponderings on the Possible Preponderance of Perpendicular Planets

Misalignments between planetary orbits and the equatorial planes of their host stars are clues about the formation and evolution of planetary systems. Earlier work found evidence for a peak near 90° in the distribution of stellar obliquities, based on frequentist tests. We performed hierarchical Bay...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jared C. Siegel, Joshua N. Winn, Simon H. Albrecht
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2023-01-01
Series:The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acd62f
_version_ 1797694766300790784
author Jared C. Siegel
Joshua N. Winn
Simon H. Albrecht
author_facet Jared C. Siegel
Joshua N. Winn
Simon H. Albrecht
author_sort Jared C. Siegel
collection DOAJ
description Misalignments between planetary orbits and the equatorial planes of their host stars are clues about the formation and evolution of planetary systems. Earlier work found evidence for a peak near 90° in the distribution of stellar obliquities, based on frequentist tests. We performed hierarchical Bayesian inference on a sample of 174 planets for which either the full three-dimensional stellar obliquity has been measured (72 planets) or for which only the sky-projected stellar obliquity has been measured (102 planets). We investigated whether the obliquities are best described by a Rayleigh distribution or by a mixture of a Rayleigh distribution representing well-aligned systems and a different distribution representing misaligned systems. The mixture models are strongly favored over the single-component distribution. For the misaligned component, we tried an isotropic distribution and a distribution peaked at 90° and found the evidence to be essentially the same for both models. Thus, our Bayesian inference engine did not find strong evidence favoring a “perpendicular peak,” unlike the frequentist tests. We also investigated selection biases that affect the inferred obliquity distribution, such as the bias of the gravity-darkening method against obliquities near 0° or 180°. Further progress in characterizing the obliquity distribution will probably require the construction of a more homogeneous and complete sample of measurements.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T03:02:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-de942b7ae9f94916934e87fcb883131a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2041-8205
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T03:02:34Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series The Astrophysical Journal Letters
spelling doaj.art-de942b7ae9f94916934e87fcb883131a2023-09-03T14:42:56ZengIOP PublishingThe Astrophysical Journal Letters2041-82052023-01-019501L210.3847/2041-8213/acd62fPonderings on the Possible Preponderance of Perpendicular PlanetsJared C. Siegel0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9337-0902Joshua N. Winn1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4265-047XSimon H. Albrecht2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1762-8235Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University , 4 Ivy Lane, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA ; siegeljc@princeton.eduDepartment of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University , 4 Ivy Lane, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA ; siegeljc@princeton.eduDepartment of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University , 4 Ivy Lane, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA ; siegeljc@princeton.edu; Stellar Astrophysics Centre, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University , Ny Munkegade 120, DK-8000 Aarhus C, DenmarkMisalignments between planetary orbits and the equatorial planes of their host stars are clues about the formation and evolution of planetary systems. Earlier work found evidence for a peak near 90° in the distribution of stellar obliquities, based on frequentist tests. We performed hierarchical Bayesian inference on a sample of 174 planets for which either the full three-dimensional stellar obliquity has been measured (72 planets) or for which only the sky-projected stellar obliquity has been measured (102 planets). We investigated whether the obliquities are best described by a Rayleigh distribution or by a mixture of a Rayleigh distribution representing well-aligned systems and a different distribution representing misaligned systems. The mixture models are strongly favored over the single-component distribution. For the misaligned component, we tried an isotropic distribution and a distribution peaked at 90° and found the evidence to be essentially the same for both models. Thus, our Bayesian inference engine did not find strong evidence favoring a “perpendicular peak,” unlike the frequentist tests. We also investigated selection biases that affect the inferred obliquity distribution, such as the bias of the gravity-darkening method against obliquities near 0° or 180°. Further progress in characterizing the obliquity distribution will probably require the construction of a more homogeneous and complete sample of measurements.https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acd62fExoplanet astronomyAstrostatistics
spellingShingle Jared C. Siegel
Joshua N. Winn
Simon H. Albrecht
Ponderings on the Possible Preponderance of Perpendicular Planets
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Exoplanet astronomy
Astrostatistics
title Ponderings on the Possible Preponderance of Perpendicular Planets
title_full Ponderings on the Possible Preponderance of Perpendicular Planets
title_fullStr Ponderings on the Possible Preponderance of Perpendicular Planets
title_full_unstemmed Ponderings on the Possible Preponderance of Perpendicular Planets
title_short Ponderings on the Possible Preponderance of Perpendicular Planets
title_sort ponderings on the possible preponderance of perpendicular planets
topic Exoplanet astronomy
Astrostatistics
url https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acd62f
work_keys_str_mv AT jaredcsiegel ponderingsonthepossiblepreponderanceofperpendicularplanets
AT joshuanwinn ponderingsonthepossiblepreponderanceofperpendicularplanets
AT simonhalbrecht ponderingsonthepossiblepreponderanceofperpendicularplanets