Grasslands may be more reliable carbon sinks than forests in California

Although natural terrestrial ecosystems have sequestered ~25% of anthropogenic CO _2 emissions, the long-term sustainability of this key ecosystem service is under question. Forests have traditionally been viewed as robust carbon (C) sinks; however, extreme heat-waves, drought and wildfire have incr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pawlok Dass, Benjamin Z Houlton, Yingping Wang, David Warlind
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2018-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aacb39
_version_ 1797748239887237120
author Pawlok Dass
Benjamin Z Houlton
Yingping Wang
David Warlind
author_facet Pawlok Dass
Benjamin Z Houlton
Yingping Wang
David Warlind
author_sort Pawlok Dass
collection DOAJ
description Although natural terrestrial ecosystems have sequestered ~25% of anthropogenic CO _2 emissions, the long-term sustainability of this key ecosystem service is under question. Forests have traditionally been viewed as robust carbon (C) sinks; however, extreme heat-waves, drought and wildfire have increased tree mortality, particularly in widespread semi-arid regions, which account for ~41% of Earth’s land surface. Using a set of modeling experiments, we show that California grasslands are a more resilient C sink than forests in response to 21st century changes in climate, with implications for designing climate-smart Cap and Trade offset policies. The resilience of grasslands to rising temperatures, drought and fire, coupled with the preferential banking of C to belowground sinks, helps to preserve sequestered terrestrial C and prevent it from re-entering the atmosphere. In contrast, California forests appear unable to cope with unmitigated global changes in the climate, switching from substantial C sinks to C sources by at least the mid-21st century. These results highlight the inherent risk of relying on forest C offsets in the absence of management interventions to avoid substantial fire-driven C emissions. On the other hand, since grassland environments, including tree-sparse rangelands, appear more capable of maintaining C sinks in 21st century, such ecosystems should be considered as an alternative C offset to climate-vulnerable forests. The further development of climate-smart approaches in California’s carbon marketplace could serve as an example to offset programs around the world, particularly those expanding into widespread arid and semi-arid regions.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T16:02:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dea5c3a1439847a6af10387e0f899334
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T16:02:04Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-dea5c3a1439847a6af10387e0f8993342023-08-09T14:35:31ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262018-01-0113707402710.1088/1748-9326/aacb39Grasslands may be more reliable carbon sinks than forests in CaliforniaPawlok Dass0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3957-4055Benjamin Z Houlton1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1414-0261Yingping Wang2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4614-6203David Warlind3Department of Land , Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, United States of America; Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.Department of Land , Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, United States of America; John Muir Institute of the Environment , University of California, Davis, United States of AmericaCSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere , Private Bag 1, Aspendale, VIC 3195, AustraliaDepartment of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science , Lund University, Lund, SwedenAlthough natural terrestrial ecosystems have sequestered ~25% of anthropogenic CO _2 emissions, the long-term sustainability of this key ecosystem service is under question. Forests have traditionally been viewed as robust carbon (C) sinks; however, extreme heat-waves, drought and wildfire have increased tree mortality, particularly in widespread semi-arid regions, which account for ~41% of Earth’s land surface. Using a set of modeling experiments, we show that California grasslands are a more resilient C sink than forests in response to 21st century changes in climate, with implications for designing climate-smart Cap and Trade offset policies. The resilience of grasslands to rising temperatures, drought and fire, coupled with the preferential banking of C to belowground sinks, helps to preserve sequestered terrestrial C and prevent it from re-entering the atmosphere. In contrast, California forests appear unable to cope with unmitigated global changes in the climate, switching from substantial C sinks to C sources by at least the mid-21st century. These results highlight the inherent risk of relying on forest C offsets in the absence of management interventions to avoid substantial fire-driven C emissions. On the other hand, since grassland environments, including tree-sparse rangelands, appear more capable of maintaining C sinks in 21st century, such ecosystems should be considered as an alternative C offset to climate-vulnerable forests. The further development of climate-smart approaches in California’s carbon marketplace could serve as an example to offset programs around the world, particularly those expanding into widespread arid and semi-arid regions.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aacb39carbon cycleclimate changedroughtwildfiregrasslandforest
spellingShingle Pawlok Dass
Benjamin Z Houlton
Yingping Wang
David Warlind
Grasslands may be more reliable carbon sinks than forests in California
Environmental Research Letters
carbon cycle
climate change
drought
wildfire
grassland
forest
title Grasslands may be more reliable carbon sinks than forests in California
title_full Grasslands may be more reliable carbon sinks than forests in California
title_fullStr Grasslands may be more reliable carbon sinks than forests in California
title_full_unstemmed Grasslands may be more reliable carbon sinks than forests in California
title_short Grasslands may be more reliable carbon sinks than forests in California
title_sort grasslands may be more reliable carbon sinks than forests in california
topic carbon cycle
climate change
drought
wildfire
grassland
forest
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aacb39
work_keys_str_mv AT pawlokdass grasslandsmaybemorereliablecarbonsinksthanforestsincalifornia
AT benjaminzhoulton grasslandsmaybemorereliablecarbonsinksthanforestsincalifornia
AT yingpingwang grasslandsmaybemorereliablecarbonsinksthanforestsincalifornia
AT davidwarlind grasslandsmaybemorereliablecarbonsinksthanforestsincalifornia