Efficacy and safety of various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stone ≥10mm: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
ABSTRACT Purpose Various surgical options are available for large proximal ureteral stones, such as extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU). However, the best option remains controver...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
2020-09-01
|
| Series: | International Brazilian Journal of Urology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382020000600902&tlng=en |
| _version_ | 1798014521564987392 |
|---|---|
| author | Yaxuan Wang Xueliang Chang Jingdong Li Zhenwei Han |
| author_facet | Yaxuan Wang Xueliang Chang Jingdong Li Zhenwei Han |
| author_sort | Yaxuan Wang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ABSTRACT Purpose Various surgical options are available for large proximal ureteral stones, such as extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU). However, the best option remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis comparing various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stones ≥10mm to address current research deficiencies. Materials and methods We searched PubMed, Ovid, Scopus (up to June 2019), as well as citation lists to identify eligible comparative studies. All clinical studies including patients comparing surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stones ≥10mm were included. A standard network meta-analysis was performed with Stata SE 14 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA) software to generate comparative statistics. The quality was assessed with level of evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine and risk of bias with the Cochrane Collaboration’s Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3 software. Results A total of 25 studies including 2.888 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. Network meta-analyses indicated that LU and PCNL had better stone-free rates and auxiliary procedures. PCNL could result in major complications and severe bleeding. In initial stone-free rate, final stone-free rate, and auxiliary procedures results, SUCRA ranking was: LU> PCNL> URSL> ESWL. In Clavien Dindo score ≥3 complications, SUCRA ranking was: LU> ESWL> URSL> PCNL. In fever, SUCRA ranking was: ESWL> LU> URSL> PCNL. In transfusion, SUCRA ranking was: LU> URSL> ESWL> PCNL. In Cluster analysis, LU had the highest advantages and acceptable side effects. Considering the traumatic nature of PCNL, it should not be an option over URSL. ESWL had the lowest advantages. Conclusions LU have the potential to be considered as the first treatment choice of proximal ureteral stone ≥10mm. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T15:18:37Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-dea5ee07518c4d87a042c0f1712e5955 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1677-6119 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T15:18:37Z |
| publishDate | 2020-09-01 |
| publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Brazilian Journal of Urology |
| spelling | doaj.art-dea5ee07518c4d87a042c0f1712e59552022-12-22T04:16:25ZengSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational Brazilian Journal of Urology1677-61192020-09-0146690292610.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0550Efficacy and safety of various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stone ≥10mm: A systematic review and network meta-analysisYaxuan WangXueliang ChangJingdong LiZhenwei Hanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1247-7004ABSTRACT Purpose Various surgical options are available for large proximal ureteral stones, such as extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU). However, the best option remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis comparing various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stones ≥10mm to address current research deficiencies. Materials and methods We searched PubMed, Ovid, Scopus (up to June 2019), as well as citation lists to identify eligible comparative studies. All clinical studies including patients comparing surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stones ≥10mm were included. A standard network meta-analysis was performed with Stata SE 14 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA) software to generate comparative statistics. The quality was assessed with level of evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine and risk of bias with the Cochrane Collaboration’s Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3 software. Results A total of 25 studies including 2.888 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. Network meta-analyses indicated that LU and PCNL had better stone-free rates and auxiliary procedures. PCNL could result in major complications and severe bleeding. In initial stone-free rate, final stone-free rate, and auxiliary procedures results, SUCRA ranking was: LU> PCNL> URSL> ESWL. In Clavien Dindo score ≥3 complications, SUCRA ranking was: LU> ESWL> URSL> PCNL. In fever, SUCRA ranking was: ESWL> LU> URSL> PCNL. In transfusion, SUCRA ranking was: LU> URSL> ESWL> PCNL. In Cluster analysis, LU had the highest advantages and acceptable side effects. Considering the traumatic nature of PCNL, it should not be an option over URSL. ESWL had the lowest advantages. Conclusions LU have the potential to be considered as the first treatment choice of proximal ureteral stone ≥10mm.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382020000600902&tlng=enLithotripsyUreteroscopyNephrolithotomy, Percutaneous |
| spellingShingle | Yaxuan Wang Xueliang Chang Jingdong Li Zhenwei Han Efficacy and safety of various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stone ≥10mm: A systematic review and network meta-analysis International Brazilian Journal of Urology Lithotripsy Ureteroscopy Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous |
| title | Efficacy and safety of various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stone ≥10mm: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
| title_full | Efficacy and safety of various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stone ≥10mm: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
| title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stone ≥10mm: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stone ≥10mm: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
| title_short | Efficacy and safety of various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stone ≥10mm: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
| title_sort | efficacy and safety of various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stone ≥10mm a systematic review and network meta analysis |
| topic | Lithotripsy Ureteroscopy Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous |
| url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382020000600902&tlng=en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yaxuanwang efficacyandsafetyofvarioussurgicaltreatmentsforproximalureteralstone10mmasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT xueliangchang efficacyandsafetyofvarioussurgicaltreatmentsforproximalureteralstone10mmasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT jingdongli efficacyandsafetyofvarioussurgicaltreatmentsforproximalureteralstone10mmasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT zhenweihan efficacyandsafetyofvarioussurgicaltreatmentsforproximalureteralstone10mmasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |