The Effect of Interactive Metalinguistic Feedback on the Iranian Middle School Students’ Argumentative Writing in English: A Mixed Methods Research

The subject of corrective feedback in writing in English has always been a contentious issue among Second Language Acquisition (SLA) researchers despite an extensive body of research investigating the matter. This mixed-methods study aimed to examine the effectiveness of Interactive Metalinguistic F...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aliakbar Tajik, Neda Hedayat, Neda Gharagozloo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch 2023-02-01
Series:Research in English Language Pedagogy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://relp.isfahan.iau.ir/article_699056_f355f5be840a22a6ae001e387a6e917c.pdf
_version_ 1797850468325523456
author Aliakbar Tajik
Neda Hedayat
Neda Gharagozloo
author_facet Aliakbar Tajik
Neda Hedayat
Neda Gharagozloo
author_sort Aliakbar Tajik
collection DOAJ
description The subject of corrective feedback in writing in English has always been a contentious issue among Second Language Acquisition (SLA) researchers despite an extensive body of research investigating the matter. This mixed-methods study aimed to examine the effectiveness of Interactive Metalinguistic Feedback (IMF) on the Iranian middle school students' ability in argumentative writing. To this aim, based on a multi-stage sampling, from 5 middle schools in Varamin, six classes were selected randomly; finally, 40 EFL students were sampled from the courses as the main participants of this study. A researcher-made writing test and a self-assessment questionnaire were utilized to collect the quantitative data.  The participants were grouped into Interactive Metalinguistic Feedback Class (IMFC) and Control Class (CC) and they were given a writing test as a pretest to ensure their homogeneity in terms of initial writing ability. After a 12-session treatment, a writing posttest was given to them. Furthermore, a self-assessment questionnaire was administered to collect data on students' attitudes toward the IMF in the learning-teaching process. To assemble the qualitative data, an interview accompanied by observation was conducted after the treatment to complement the quantitative results. The experimental findings of this current study revealed that IMF had a significant effect on the growth of argumentative writing ability among EFL students. The results of the qualitative part also indicated that social learning, situated learning, and dialogic interaction through IMF encouraged students to develop their writing skills as they co-constructed knowledge with others.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T19:00:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dea6d4b2723e4f50ab776047e17015d4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2588-3259
2538-4244
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T19:00:45Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch
record_format Article
series Research in English Language Pedagogy
spelling doaj.art-dea6d4b2723e4f50ab776047e17015d42023-04-08T07:33:55ZengIslamic Azad University, Isfahan BranchResearch in English Language Pedagogy2588-32592538-42442023-02-01111638410.30486/relp.2022.1952520.1362699056The Effect of Interactive Metalinguistic Feedback on the Iranian Middle School Students’ Argumentative Writing in English: A Mixed Methods ResearchAliakbar Tajik0Neda Hedayat1Neda Gharagozloo2Department of English Translation, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University, Varamin, IranDepartment of English Translation, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University, Varamin, IranDepartment of English Translation, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Varamin, IranThe subject of corrective feedback in writing in English has always been a contentious issue among Second Language Acquisition (SLA) researchers despite an extensive body of research investigating the matter. This mixed-methods study aimed to examine the effectiveness of Interactive Metalinguistic Feedback (IMF) on the Iranian middle school students' ability in argumentative writing. To this aim, based on a multi-stage sampling, from 5 middle schools in Varamin, six classes were selected randomly; finally, 40 EFL students were sampled from the courses as the main participants of this study. A researcher-made writing test and a self-assessment questionnaire were utilized to collect the quantitative data.  The participants were grouped into Interactive Metalinguistic Feedback Class (IMFC) and Control Class (CC) and they were given a writing test as a pretest to ensure their homogeneity in terms of initial writing ability. After a 12-session treatment, a writing posttest was given to them. Furthermore, a self-assessment questionnaire was administered to collect data on students' attitudes toward the IMF in the learning-teaching process. To assemble the qualitative data, an interview accompanied by observation was conducted after the treatment to complement the quantitative results. The experimental findings of this current study revealed that IMF had a significant effect on the growth of argumentative writing ability among EFL students. The results of the qualitative part also indicated that social learning, situated learning, and dialogic interaction through IMF encouraged students to develop their writing skills as they co-constructed knowledge with others.https://relp.isfahan.iau.ir/article_699056_f355f5be840a22a6ae001e387a6e917c.pdfco-constructed knowledgedialogic interactionmetalinguistic feedbacksituated learningsocial learning
spellingShingle Aliakbar Tajik
Neda Hedayat
Neda Gharagozloo
The Effect of Interactive Metalinguistic Feedback on the Iranian Middle School Students’ Argumentative Writing in English: A Mixed Methods Research
Research in English Language Pedagogy
co-constructed knowledge
dialogic interaction
metalinguistic feedback
situated learning
social learning
title The Effect of Interactive Metalinguistic Feedback on the Iranian Middle School Students’ Argumentative Writing in English: A Mixed Methods Research
title_full The Effect of Interactive Metalinguistic Feedback on the Iranian Middle School Students’ Argumentative Writing in English: A Mixed Methods Research
title_fullStr The Effect of Interactive Metalinguistic Feedback on the Iranian Middle School Students’ Argumentative Writing in English: A Mixed Methods Research
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Interactive Metalinguistic Feedback on the Iranian Middle School Students’ Argumentative Writing in English: A Mixed Methods Research
title_short The Effect of Interactive Metalinguistic Feedback on the Iranian Middle School Students’ Argumentative Writing in English: A Mixed Methods Research
title_sort effect of interactive metalinguistic feedback on the iranian middle school students argumentative writing in english a mixed methods research
topic co-constructed knowledge
dialogic interaction
metalinguistic feedback
situated learning
social learning
url https://relp.isfahan.iau.ir/article_699056_f355f5be840a22a6ae001e387a6e917c.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT aliakbartajik theeffectofinteractivemetalinguisticfeedbackontheiranianmiddleschoolstudentsargumentativewritinginenglishamixedmethodsresearch
AT nedahedayat theeffectofinteractivemetalinguisticfeedbackontheiranianmiddleschoolstudentsargumentativewritinginenglishamixedmethodsresearch
AT nedagharagozloo theeffectofinteractivemetalinguisticfeedbackontheiranianmiddleschoolstudentsargumentativewritinginenglishamixedmethodsresearch
AT aliakbartajik effectofinteractivemetalinguisticfeedbackontheiranianmiddleschoolstudentsargumentativewritinginenglishamixedmethodsresearch
AT nedahedayat effectofinteractivemetalinguisticfeedbackontheiranianmiddleschoolstudentsargumentativewritinginenglishamixedmethodsresearch
AT nedagharagozloo effectofinteractivemetalinguisticfeedbackontheiranianmiddleschoolstudentsargumentativewritinginenglishamixedmethodsresearch