Comparing ERAS-outpatient versus standard-inpatient hip and knee replacements: a mixed methods study exploring the experience of patients who underwent both

Abstract Background Optimizing patients’ total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) experience is as crucial for providing high quality care as improving safety and clinical effectiveness. Yet, little evidence is available on patient experience in standard-inpatient and enhanced recovery after surger...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandre Hardy, Jonathan Gervais-Hupé, François Desmeules, Anne Hudon, Kadija Perreault, Pascal-André Vendittoli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-11-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04847-9
_version_ 1818851454027300864
author Alexandre Hardy
Jonathan Gervais-Hupé
François Desmeules
Anne Hudon
Kadija Perreault
Pascal-André Vendittoli
author_facet Alexandre Hardy
Jonathan Gervais-Hupé
François Desmeules
Anne Hudon
Kadija Perreault
Pascal-André Vendittoli
author_sort Alexandre Hardy
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Optimizing patients’ total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) experience is as crucial for providing high quality care as improving safety and clinical effectiveness. Yet, little evidence is available on patient experience in standard-inpatient and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)-outpatient programs. Therefore, this study aimed to gain a more in-depth understanding of the patient experience of ERAS-outpatient programs in comparison to standard-inpatient programs. Methods We conducted a convergent mixed methods study of 48 consecutive patients who experienced both standard-inpatient and ERAS-outpatient THA/TKA contralaterally. A reflective thematic analysis was conducted based on data collected via a questionnaire. Bivariate correlations between the patient experience and patients’ characteristics, clinical outcomes and care components satisfaction were performed. Then, the quantitative and qualitative data were integrated together. Results The theme Support makes the difference for better and for worse was identified by patients as crucial to their experience in both joint replacement programs. On the other hand, patients identified 3 themes distinguishing their ERAS-outpatient from their standard-inpatient experience: 1) Minimizing inconvenience, 2) Home sweet home and 3) Returning to normal function and activities. Potential optimization expressed by patients were to receive more preoperative information, additional postoperative rehabilitation sessions, and ensuring better coherence of care between hospital and home care teams. Weak to moderate positive and statistically significant correlations were found between patients’ THA/TKA experience and satisfaction with pain management, hospital stay, postoperative recovery, home care, and overall results (rs = + [0.36–0.66], p-value < 0.01). Conclusion Whatever the perioperative program, the key to improving patients’ THA/TKA experience lies in improving support throughout the care episode. However, compared to standard-inpatient care, the ERAS-outpatient program improves patients’ experience by providing dedicated support in postoperative care, reducing postoperative inconvenience, optimizing pain management, returning home sooner, and recovering and regaining function sooner. Patients’ THA/TKA experience could further be enhanced by optimizing the information provided to the patient, the rehabilitation program and the coherence between care teams.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T07:05:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-deb02cb6bcb84ef8a2e2a8391cdf0c3c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2474
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T07:05:17Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
spelling doaj.art-deb02cb6bcb84ef8a2e2a8391cdf0c3c2022-12-21T20:31:19ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742021-11-0122111110.1186/s12891-021-04847-9Comparing ERAS-outpatient versus standard-inpatient hip and knee replacements: a mixed methods study exploring the experience of patients who underwent bothAlexandre Hardy0Jonathan Gervais-Hupé1François Desmeules2Anne Hudon3Kadija Perreault4Pascal-André Vendittoli5Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies, Université de MontréalSchool of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de MontréalCentre de recherche de l’Hôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontSchool of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de MontréalDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université LavalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Surgery Department, Université de MontréalAbstract Background Optimizing patients’ total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) experience is as crucial for providing high quality care as improving safety and clinical effectiveness. Yet, little evidence is available on patient experience in standard-inpatient and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)-outpatient programs. Therefore, this study aimed to gain a more in-depth understanding of the patient experience of ERAS-outpatient programs in comparison to standard-inpatient programs. Methods We conducted a convergent mixed methods study of 48 consecutive patients who experienced both standard-inpatient and ERAS-outpatient THA/TKA contralaterally. A reflective thematic analysis was conducted based on data collected via a questionnaire. Bivariate correlations between the patient experience and patients’ characteristics, clinical outcomes and care components satisfaction were performed. Then, the quantitative and qualitative data were integrated together. Results The theme Support makes the difference for better and for worse was identified by patients as crucial to their experience in both joint replacement programs. On the other hand, patients identified 3 themes distinguishing their ERAS-outpatient from their standard-inpatient experience: 1) Minimizing inconvenience, 2) Home sweet home and 3) Returning to normal function and activities. Potential optimization expressed by patients were to receive more preoperative information, additional postoperative rehabilitation sessions, and ensuring better coherence of care between hospital and home care teams. Weak to moderate positive and statistically significant correlations were found between patients’ THA/TKA experience and satisfaction with pain management, hospital stay, postoperative recovery, home care, and overall results (rs = + [0.36–0.66], p-value < 0.01). Conclusion Whatever the perioperative program, the key to improving patients’ THA/TKA experience lies in improving support throughout the care episode. However, compared to standard-inpatient care, the ERAS-outpatient program improves patients’ experience by providing dedicated support in postoperative care, reducing postoperative inconvenience, optimizing pain management, returning home sooner, and recovering and regaining function sooner. Patients’ THA/TKA experience could further be enhanced by optimizing the information provided to the patient, the rehabilitation program and the coherence between care teams.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04847-9Arthroplasty, replacement, kneeArthroplasty, replacement, hipEnhanced recovery after surgeryFast-trackOutpatientPatient experience
spellingShingle Alexandre Hardy
Jonathan Gervais-Hupé
François Desmeules
Anne Hudon
Kadija Perreault
Pascal-André Vendittoli
Comparing ERAS-outpatient versus standard-inpatient hip and knee replacements: a mixed methods study exploring the experience of patients who underwent both
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Arthroplasty, replacement, knee
Arthroplasty, replacement, hip
Enhanced recovery after surgery
Fast-track
Outpatient
Patient experience
title Comparing ERAS-outpatient versus standard-inpatient hip and knee replacements: a mixed methods study exploring the experience of patients who underwent both
title_full Comparing ERAS-outpatient versus standard-inpatient hip and knee replacements: a mixed methods study exploring the experience of patients who underwent both
title_fullStr Comparing ERAS-outpatient versus standard-inpatient hip and knee replacements: a mixed methods study exploring the experience of patients who underwent both
title_full_unstemmed Comparing ERAS-outpatient versus standard-inpatient hip and knee replacements: a mixed methods study exploring the experience of patients who underwent both
title_short Comparing ERAS-outpatient versus standard-inpatient hip and knee replacements: a mixed methods study exploring the experience of patients who underwent both
title_sort comparing eras outpatient versus standard inpatient hip and knee replacements a mixed methods study exploring the experience of patients who underwent both
topic Arthroplasty, replacement, knee
Arthroplasty, replacement, hip
Enhanced recovery after surgery
Fast-track
Outpatient
Patient experience
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04847-9
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandrehardy comparingerasoutpatientversusstandardinpatienthipandkneereplacementsamixedmethodsstudyexploringtheexperienceofpatientswhounderwentboth
AT jonathangervaishupe comparingerasoutpatientversusstandardinpatienthipandkneereplacementsamixedmethodsstudyexploringtheexperienceofpatientswhounderwentboth
AT francoisdesmeules comparingerasoutpatientversusstandardinpatienthipandkneereplacementsamixedmethodsstudyexploringtheexperienceofpatientswhounderwentboth
AT annehudon comparingerasoutpatientversusstandardinpatienthipandkneereplacementsamixedmethodsstudyexploringtheexperienceofpatientswhounderwentboth
AT kadijaperreault comparingerasoutpatientversusstandardinpatienthipandkneereplacementsamixedmethodsstudyexploringtheexperienceofpatientswhounderwentboth
AT pascalandrevendittoli comparingerasoutpatientversusstandardinpatienthipandkneereplacementsamixedmethodsstudyexploringtheexperienceofpatientswhounderwentboth