Effectiveness of Dry Needling versus Manual Therapy in Myofascial Temporomandibular Disorders: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Dry needling (DN) is an invasive physiotherapy technique employed for reducing myofascial pain. To compare the effectiveness of dry needling (DN) versus manual therapy (MT) in improving pain, active maximal mouth opening (AMMO) and cervical disability in patients with myofascial pain from temporoman...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rocío García-de la-Banda-García, Irene Cortés-Pérez, María del Rocío Ibancos-Losada, María del Carmen López-Ruiz, Esteban Obrero-Gaitán, María Catalina Osuna-Pérez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-09-01
Series:Journal of Personalized Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/9/1415
_version_ 1797579265150025728
author Rocío García-de la-Banda-García
Irene Cortés-Pérez
María del Rocío Ibancos-Losada
María del Carmen López-Ruiz
Esteban Obrero-Gaitán
María Catalina Osuna-Pérez
author_facet Rocío García-de la-Banda-García
Irene Cortés-Pérez
María del Rocío Ibancos-Losada
María del Carmen López-Ruiz
Esteban Obrero-Gaitán
María Catalina Osuna-Pérez
author_sort Rocío García-de la-Banda-García
collection DOAJ
description Dry needling (DN) is an invasive physiotherapy technique employed for reducing myofascial pain. To compare the effectiveness of dry needling (DN) versus manual therapy (MT) in improving pain, active maximal mouth opening (AMMO) and cervical disability in patients with myofascial pain from temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) were investigated against these treatments. A single-blind, randomized controlled trial was carried out. Individuals (<i>n</i> = 50) with TMDs were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the DN (<i>n</i> = 25) or MT group (<i>n</i> = 25). Each group received three sessions, separated by 4 days, of either DN or MT. Outcomes were assessed according to pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale), AMMO (cm), disability (Neck Disability Index), and pressure–pain threshold (PPT) (digital algometry) from the active myofascial trigger points. In both groups, pain and neck disability were significantly lower at the end of treatment compared with those measured at baseline (pain: −2.52 with 95% CI: −3.43 to −1.60 for DN group; pain: −2.92 with 95% CI: −3.77 to −2.07 for MT group; disability: −3.2 with 95% CI: −4.31 to −2.09 for DN group; disability: −2.68 with 95% CI: −3.56 to −1.79 for MT group), but not were not lower after the first session, without differences between the groups. AMMO was significantly higher after the first session (0.16 with 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.29 for DN group; 0.30 with 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.41 for MT group) and at the end of treatment in both groups (0.27 with 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.41 for DN group; 0.37 with 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.52 for MT group) compared with the baseline measurements. Finally, PPT results for the masseter and pterygoid muscles were significantly higher at the end of treatment in both groups (without statistically significant differences between groups), but not after the first session. The assessed therapies, DN and MT, are equally effective in improving pain, AMMO, cervical disability, and PPT in the muscles directly involved in the temporomandibular joint biomechanics of patients with myofascial TMDs.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T22:34:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dec7931b5dad4e9da1c20dab6b7f887a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4426
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T22:34:39Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Personalized Medicine
spelling doaj.art-dec7931b5dad4e9da1c20dab6b7f887a2023-11-19T11:31:56ZengMDPI AGJournal of Personalized Medicine2075-44262023-09-01139141510.3390/jpm13091415Effectiveness of Dry Needling versus Manual Therapy in Myofascial Temporomandibular Disorders: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled TrialRocío García-de la-Banda-García0Irene Cortés-Pérez1María del Rocío Ibancos-Losada2María del Carmen López-Ruiz3Esteban Obrero-Gaitán4María Catalina Osuna-Pérez5FISIDEC University Center, University of Córdoba, C/José Aumente Baena s/n, 14940 Cabra, SpainDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, 23071 Jaén, SpainDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, 23071 Jaén, SpainDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, 23071 Jaén, SpainDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, 23071 Jaén, SpainDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, 23071 Jaén, SpainDry needling (DN) is an invasive physiotherapy technique employed for reducing myofascial pain. To compare the effectiveness of dry needling (DN) versus manual therapy (MT) in improving pain, active maximal mouth opening (AMMO) and cervical disability in patients with myofascial pain from temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) were investigated against these treatments. A single-blind, randomized controlled trial was carried out. Individuals (<i>n</i> = 50) with TMDs were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the DN (<i>n</i> = 25) or MT group (<i>n</i> = 25). Each group received three sessions, separated by 4 days, of either DN or MT. Outcomes were assessed according to pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale), AMMO (cm), disability (Neck Disability Index), and pressure–pain threshold (PPT) (digital algometry) from the active myofascial trigger points. In both groups, pain and neck disability were significantly lower at the end of treatment compared with those measured at baseline (pain: −2.52 with 95% CI: −3.43 to −1.60 for DN group; pain: −2.92 with 95% CI: −3.77 to −2.07 for MT group; disability: −3.2 with 95% CI: −4.31 to −2.09 for DN group; disability: −2.68 with 95% CI: −3.56 to −1.79 for MT group), but not were not lower after the first session, without differences between the groups. AMMO was significantly higher after the first session (0.16 with 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.29 for DN group; 0.30 with 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.41 for MT group) and at the end of treatment in both groups (0.27 with 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.41 for DN group; 0.37 with 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.52 for MT group) compared with the baseline measurements. Finally, PPT results for the masseter and pterygoid muscles were significantly higher at the end of treatment in both groups (without statistically significant differences between groups), but not after the first session. The assessed therapies, DN and MT, are equally effective in improving pain, AMMO, cervical disability, and PPT in the muscles directly involved in the temporomandibular joint biomechanics of patients with myofascial TMDs.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/9/1415temporomandibular disordersdry needlingmanual therapypainpressure–pain thresholdtrigger points
spellingShingle Rocío García-de la-Banda-García
Irene Cortés-Pérez
María del Rocío Ibancos-Losada
María del Carmen López-Ruiz
Esteban Obrero-Gaitán
María Catalina Osuna-Pérez
Effectiveness of Dry Needling versus Manual Therapy in Myofascial Temporomandibular Disorders: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal of Personalized Medicine
temporomandibular disorders
dry needling
manual therapy
pain
pressure–pain threshold
trigger points
title Effectiveness of Dry Needling versus Manual Therapy in Myofascial Temporomandibular Disorders: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Effectiveness of Dry Needling versus Manual Therapy in Myofascial Temporomandibular Disorders: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Dry Needling versus Manual Therapy in Myofascial Temporomandibular Disorders: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Dry Needling versus Manual Therapy in Myofascial Temporomandibular Disorders: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Effectiveness of Dry Needling versus Manual Therapy in Myofascial Temporomandibular Disorders: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort effectiveness of dry needling versus manual therapy in myofascial temporomandibular disorders a single blind randomized controlled trial
topic temporomandibular disorders
dry needling
manual therapy
pain
pressure–pain threshold
trigger points
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/9/1415
work_keys_str_mv AT rociogarciadelabandagarcia effectivenessofdryneedlingversusmanualtherapyinmyofascialtemporomandibulardisordersasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT irenecortesperez effectivenessofdryneedlingversusmanualtherapyinmyofascialtemporomandibulardisordersasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mariadelrocioibancoslosada effectivenessofdryneedlingversusmanualtherapyinmyofascialtemporomandibulardisordersasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mariadelcarmenlopezruiz effectivenessofdryneedlingversusmanualtherapyinmyofascialtemporomandibulardisordersasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT estebanobrerogaitan effectivenessofdryneedlingversusmanualtherapyinmyofascialtemporomandibulardisordersasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mariacatalinaosunaperez effectivenessofdryneedlingversusmanualtherapyinmyofascialtemporomandibulardisordersasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial