Escalation with Overdose Control is More Efficient and Safer than Accelerated Titration for Dose Finding

The standard 3 + 3 or “modified Fibonacci” up-and-down (MF-UD) method of dose escalation is by far the most used design in dose-finding cancer trials. However, MF-UD has always shown inferior performance when compared with its competitors regarding number of patients treated at optimal doses. A cons...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: André Rogatko, Galen Cook-Wiens, Mourad Tighiouart, Steven Piantadosi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-07-01
Series:Entropy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/17/8/5288
_version_ 1818039675648999424
author André Rogatko
Galen Cook-Wiens
Mourad Tighiouart
Steven Piantadosi
author_facet André Rogatko
Galen Cook-Wiens
Mourad Tighiouart
Steven Piantadosi
author_sort André Rogatko
collection DOAJ
description The standard 3 + 3 or “modified Fibonacci” up-and-down (MF-UD) method of dose escalation is by far the most used design in dose-finding cancer trials. However, MF-UD has always shown inferior performance when compared with its competitors regarding number of patients treated at optimal doses. A consequence of using less effective designs is that more patients are treated with doses outside the therapeutic window. In June 2012, the U S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rejected the proposal to use Escalation with Overdose Control (EWOC), an established dose-finding method which has been extensively used in FDA-approved first in human trials and imposed a variation of the MF-UD, known as accelerated titration (AT) design. This event motivated us to perform an extensive simulation study comparing the operating characteristics of AT and EWOC. We show that the AT design has poor operating characteristics relative to three versions of EWOC under several practical scenarios. From the clinical investigator’s perspective, lower bias and mean square error make EWOC designs preferable than AT designs without compromising safety. From a patient’s perspective, uniformly higher proportion of patients receiving doses within an optimal range of the true MTD makes EWOC designs preferable than AT designs.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T08:02:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-decae53d612949bc8f82f61c199babc4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1099-4300
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T08:02:24Z
publishDate 2015-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Entropy
spelling doaj.art-decae53d612949bc8f82f61c199babc42022-12-22T01:56:45ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002015-07-011785288530310.3390/e17085288e17085288Escalation with Overdose Control is More Efficient and Safer than Accelerated Titration for Dose FindingAndré Rogatko0Galen Cook-Wiens1Mourad Tighiouart2Steven Piantadosi3Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd., PACT, Suite 900C, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USABiostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd., PACT, Suite 900C, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USABiostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd., PACT, Suite 900C, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USABiostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd., PACT, Suite 900C, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USAThe standard 3 + 3 or “modified Fibonacci” up-and-down (MF-UD) method of dose escalation is by far the most used design in dose-finding cancer trials. However, MF-UD has always shown inferior performance when compared with its competitors regarding number of patients treated at optimal doses. A consequence of using less effective designs is that more patients are treated with doses outside the therapeutic window. In June 2012, the U S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rejected the proposal to use Escalation with Overdose Control (EWOC), an established dose-finding method which has been extensively used in FDA-approved first in human trials and imposed a variation of the MF-UD, known as accelerated titration (AT) design. This event motivated us to perform an extensive simulation study comparing the operating characteristics of AT and EWOC. We show that the AT design has poor operating characteristics relative to three versions of EWOC under several practical scenarios. From the clinical investigator’s perspective, lower bias and mean square error make EWOC designs preferable than AT designs without compromising safety. From a patient’s perspective, uniformly higher proportion of patients receiving doses within an optimal range of the true MTD makes EWOC designs preferable than AT designs.http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/17/8/5288dose findingcancer early trialsphase I trialsescalation with overdose controlaccelerated titrationEWOC
spellingShingle André Rogatko
Galen Cook-Wiens
Mourad Tighiouart
Steven Piantadosi
Escalation with Overdose Control is More Efficient and Safer than Accelerated Titration for Dose Finding
Entropy
dose finding
cancer early trials
phase I trials
escalation with overdose control
accelerated titration
EWOC
title Escalation with Overdose Control is More Efficient and Safer than Accelerated Titration for Dose Finding
title_full Escalation with Overdose Control is More Efficient and Safer than Accelerated Titration for Dose Finding
title_fullStr Escalation with Overdose Control is More Efficient and Safer than Accelerated Titration for Dose Finding
title_full_unstemmed Escalation with Overdose Control is More Efficient and Safer than Accelerated Titration for Dose Finding
title_short Escalation with Overdose Control is More Efficient and Safer than Accelerated Titration for Dose Finding
title_sort escalation with overdose control is more efficient and safer than accelerated titration for dose finding
topic dose finding
cancer early trials
phase I trials
escalation with overdose control
accelerated titration
EWOC
url http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/17/8/5288
work_keys_str_mv AT andrerogatko escalationwithoverdosecontrolismoreefficientandsaferthanacceleratedtitrationfordosefinding
AT galencookwiens escalationwithoverdosecontrolismoreefficientandsaferthanacceleratedtitrationfordosefinding
AT mouradtighiouart escalationwithoverdosecontrolismoreefficientandsaferthanacceleratedtitrationfordosefinding
AT stevenpiantadosi escalationwithoverdosecontrolismoreefficientandsaferthanacceleratedtitrationfordosefinding