Comparison of under-nutrition among children aged 1-5 years using WHO and NCHS growth charts

Introduction: Anthropometric indices are widely used to assess the health and nutritional status of children. National Centre for Health Statistics /World Health Organisation growth reference (NCHS reference) and World Health Organisation (WHO) Growth standards are the two different growth charts us...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R.K. Nayak, P.R. Walvekar, M.D Mallapur, S.M. Katti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Al Ameen Medical College 2014-10-01
Series:Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ajms.alameenmedical.org/ArticlePDFs/10%20AJMS%20V7.N4.2014%20p%20299-306.pdf
_version_ 1819098950253150208
author R.K. Nayak
P.R. Walvekar
M.D Mallapur
S.M. Katti
author_facet R.K. Nayak
P.R. Walvekar
M.D Mallapur
S.M. Katti
author_sort R.K. Nayak
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Anthropometric indices are widely used to assess the health and nutritional status of children. National Centre for Health Statistics /World Health Organisation growth reference (NCHS reference) and World Health Organisation (WHO) Growth standards are the two different growth charts used to monitor the growth of under-five children. Since the evaluation of child growth trajectories and the interventions designed to improve child health are highly dependent on the growth charts used, it is important to understand the impact of using the WHO versus the NCHS charts on the assessment of growth and estimates of malnutrition. Objective: The objective was to assess the nutritional status of under-five children based on anthropometry and to compare the under-nutrition rates based on newly developed WHO standards and the older NCHS reference. Materials and Methods: A cross sectional study was undertaken in a Primary Health Centre area comprising of 933 children aged between 1-5yrs and their mothers. Anthropometric measurements i.e. height and weight of each subject were taken according to standard procedures. Children were considered as underweight, stunted and wasted if their weight-for age, height-for-age and weight-for-height z-scores were below -2.0 SD of the NCHS and WHO growth charts. Statistical analysis were performed using EPI INFO version 7.1.4 statistical package. Results: Out of 933 under-five children 453 were boys and 480 were girls. The prevalence of wasting, stunting and underweight (< -2 SD) by WHO standards was 23.7%, 38.2% and 37% respectively and by NCHS reference was 23.5%, 33% and 46.6% respectively. The prevalence of severe wasting, stunting and underweight (< - 3 SD) was 7.4%, 14.3% and 8.8% respectively by WHO standards and 4.1%, 11.8% and 9.8% respectively by NCHS standards. Conclusion: Prevalence of underweight was higher with NCHS reference and that of stunting was higher with WHO standards. However there was no much difference seen with wasting. Severe wasting and stunting was more by WHO classification. The rates of severe wasting, severe stunting were higher in boys and severe underweight was higher in girls WHO classification would be preferred to assess malnutrition among Indian under-five children.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T00:39:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ded09a7b8df345b189720df30388ed99
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0974-1143
0974-1143
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T00:39:07Z
publishDate 2014-10-01
publisher Al Ameen Medical College
record_format Article
series Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-ded09a7b8df345b189720df30388ed992022-12-21T18:44:44ZengAl Ameen Medical CollegeAl Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences0974-11430974-11432014-10-010704299306Comparison of under-nutrition among children aged 1-5 years using WHO and NCHS growth chartsR.K. Nayak0P.R. Walvekar1M.D Mallapur2S.M. Katti3Department of Community Medicine, Sri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Manjushree Nagar, Sattur, Dharwad, Karnataka, IndiaDepartment of Community Medicine, KLE University’s Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Nehru Nagar, Belgaum, Karnataka, IndiaDepartment of Community Medicine, KLE University’s Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Nehru Nagar, Belgaum, Karnataka, IndiaDepartment of Community Medicine, KLE University’s Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Nehru Nagar, Belgaum, Karnataka, IndiaIntroduction: Anthropometric indices are widely used to assess the health and nutritional status of children. National Centre for Health Statistics /World Health Organisation growth reference (NCHS reference) and World Health Organisation (WHO) Growth standards are the two different growth charts used to monitor the growth of under-five children. Since the evaluation of child growth trajectories and the interventions designed to improve child health are highly dependent on the growth charts used, it is important to understand the impact of using the WHO versus the NCHS charts on the assessment of growth and estimates of malnutrition. Objective: The objective was to assess the nutritional status of under-five children based on anthropometry and to compare the under-nutrition rates based on newly developed WHO standards and the older NCHS reference. Materials and Methods: A cross sectional study was undertaken in a Primary Health Centre area comprising of 933 children aged between 1-5yrs and their mothers. Anthropometric measurements i.e. height and weight of each subject were taken according to standard procedures. Children were considered as underweight, stunted and wasted if their weight-for age, height-for-age and weight-for-height z-scores were below -2.0 SD of the NCHS and WHO growth charts. Statistical analysis were performed using EPI INFO version 7.1.4 statistical package. Results: Out of 933 under-five children 453 were boys and 480 were girls. The prevalence of wasting, stunting and underweight (< -2 SD) by WHO standards was 23.7%, 38.2% and 37% respectively and by NCHS reference was 23.5%, 33% and 46.6% respectively. The prevalence of severe wasting, stunting and underweight (< - 3 SD) was 7.4%, 14.3% and 8.8% respectively by WHO standards and 4.1%, 11.8% and 9.8% respectively by NCHS standards. Conclusion: Prevalence of underweight was higher with NCHS reference and that of stunting was higher with WHO standards. However there was no much difference seen with wasting. Severe wasting and stunting was more by WHO classification. The rates of severe wasting, severe stunting were higher in boys and severe underweight was higher in girls WHO classification would be preferred to assess malnutrition among Indian under-five children.http://ajms.alameenmedical.org/ArticlePDFs/10%20AJMS%20V7.N4.2014%20p%20299-306.pdfComparisonunder-nutritionWHONCHS
spellingShingle R.K. Nayak
P.R. Walvekar
M.D Mallapur
S.M. Katti
Comparison of under-nutrition among children aged 1-5 years using WHO and NCHS growth charts
Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences
Comparison
under-nutrition
WHO
NCHS
title Comparison of under-nutrition among children aged 1-5 years using WHO and NCHS growth charts
title_full Comparison of under-nutrition among children aged 1-5 years using WHO and NCHS growth charts
title_fullStr Comparison of under-nutrition among children aged 1-5 years using WHO and NCHS growth charts
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of under-nutrition among children aged 1-5 years using WHO and NCHS growth charts
title_short Comparison of under-nutrition among children aged 1-5 years using WHO and NCHS growth charts
title_sort comparison of under nutrition among children aged 1 5 years using who and nchs growth charts
topic Comparison
under-nutrition
WHO
NCHS
url http://ajms.alameenmedical.org/ArticlePDFs/10%20AJMS%20V7.N4.2014%20p%20299-306.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rknayak comparisonofundernutritionamongchildrenaged15yearsusingwhoandnchsgrowthcharts
AT prwalvekar comparisonofundernutritionamongchildrenaged15yearsusingwhoandnchsgrowthcharts
AT mdmallapur comparisonofundernutritionamongchildrenaged15yearsusingwhoandnchsgrowthcharts
AT smkatti comparisonofundernutritionamongchildrenaged15yearsusingwhoandnchsgrowthcharts