Influence of initial misdiagnosis on mortality in patients with bacteraemia: propensity score matching and propensity score weighting analyses
Abstract Background The diagnostic process is a key element of medicine but it is complex and prone to errors. Infectious diseases are one of the three categories of diseases in which diagnostic errors can be most harmful to patients. In this study we aimed to estimate the effect of initial misdiagn...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2024-04-01
|
Series: | BMC Infectious Diseases |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-09299-9 |
_version_ | 1827284471739580416 |
---|---|
author | Anna M. Eikenboom Merel M. C. Lambregts Mark G. J. de Boer Saskia le Cessie |
author_facet | Anna M. Eikenboom Merel M. C. Lambregts Mark G. J. de Boer Saskia le Cessie |
author_sort | Anna M. Eikenboom |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background The diagnostic process is a key element of medicine but it is complex and prone to errors. Infectious diseases are one of the three categories of diseases in which diagnostic errors can be most harmful to patients. In this study we aimed to estimate the effect of initial misdiagnosis of the source of infection in patients with bacteraemia on 14 day mortality using propensity score methods to adjust for confounding. Methods Data from a previously described longitudinal cohort of patients diagnosed with monobacterial bloodstream infection (BSI) at the Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC) between 2013 and 2015 were used. Propensity score matching and inversed probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were applied to correct for confounding. The average treatment effect on the treated (ATT), which in this study was the average effect of initial misdiagnosis on the misdiagnosed (AEMM), was estimated. Methodological issues that were encountered when applying propensity score methods were addressed by performing additional sensitivity analyses. Sensitivity analyses consisted of varying caliper in propensity score matching and using different truncated weights in inversed probability of treatment weighting. Results Data of 887 patients were included in the study. Propensity scores ranged between 0.015 and 0.999 and 80 patients (9.9%) had a propensity score > 0.95. In the matched analyses, 35 of the 171 misdiagnosed patients died within 14 days (20.5%), versus 10 of the 171 correctly diagnosed patients (5.8%), yielding a difference of 14.6% (7.6%; 21.6%). In the total group of patients, the observed percentage of patients with an incorrect initial diagnosis that died within 14 days was 19.8% while propensity score reweighting estimated that their probability of dying would have been 6.5%, if they had been correctly diagnosed (difference 13.3% (95% CI 6.9%;19.6%)). After adjustment for all variables that showed disbalance in the propensity score a difference of 13.7% (7.4%; 19.9%) was estimated. Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. However, performing weighted analyses without truncation yielded unstable results. Conclusion Thus, we observed a substantial increase of 14 day mortality in initially misdiagnosed patients. Furthermore, several patients received propensity scores extremely close to one and were almost sure to be initially misdiagnosed. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-24T09:55:50Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ded10fe65dc846e0b3e2741a887e5c24 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1471-2334 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-24T09:55:50Z |
publishDate | 2024-04-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Infectious Diseases |
spelling | doaj.art-ded10fe65dc846e0b3e2741a887e5c242024-04-14T11:08:58ZengBMCBMC Infectious Diseases1471-23342024-04-0124111310.1186/s12879-024-09299-9Influence of initial misdiagnosis on mortality in patients with bacteraemia: propensity score matching and propensity score weighting analysesAnna M. Eikenboom0Merel M. C. Lambregts1Mark G. J. de Boer2Saskia le Cessie3Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC)Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC)Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC)Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC)Abstract Background The diagnostic process is a key element of medicine but it is complex and prone to errors. Infectious diseases are one of the three categories of diseases in which diagnostic errors can be most harmful to patients. In this study we aimed to estimate the effect of initial misdiagnosis of the source of infection in patients with bacteraemia on 14 day mortality using propensity score methods to adjust for confounding. Methods Data from a previously described longitudinal cohort of patients diagnosed with monobacterial bloodstream infection (BSI) at the Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC) between 2013 and 2015 were used. Propensity score matching and inversed probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were applied to correct for confounding. The average treatment effect on the treated (ATT), which in this study was the average effect of initial misdiagnosis on the misdiagnosed (AEMM), was estimated. Methodological issues that were encountered when applying propensity score methods were addressed by performing additional sensitivity analyses. Sensitivity analyses consisted of varying caliper in propensity score matching and using different truncated weights in inversed probability of treatment weighting. Results Data of 887 patients were included in the study. Propensity scores ranged between 0.015 and 0.999 and 80 patients (9.9%) had a propensity score > 0.95. In the matched analyses, 35 of the 171 misdiagnosed patients died within 14 days (20.5%), versus 10 of the 171 correctly diagnosed patients (5.8%), yielding a difference of 14.6% (7.6%; 21.6%). In the total group of patients, the observed percentage of patients with an incorrect initial diagnosis that died within 14 days was 19.8% while propensity score reweighting estimated that their probability of dying would have been 6.5%, if they had been correctly diagnosed (difference 13.3% (95% CI 6.9%;19.6%)). After adjustment for all variables that showed disbalance in the propensity score a difference of 13.7% (7.4%; 19.9%) was estimated. Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. However, performing weighted analyses without truncation yielded unstable results. Conclusion Thus, we observed a substantial increase of 14 day mortality in initially misdiagnosed patients. Furthermore, several patients received propensity scores extremely close to one and were almost sure to be initially misdiagnosed.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-09299-9MisdiagnosisPropensity score matchingIPTWBacteraemiaMortality |
spellingShingle | Anna M. Eikenboom Merel M. C. Lambregts Mark G. J. de Boer Saskia le Cessie Influence of initial misdiagnosis on mortality in patients with bacteraemia: propensity score matching and propensity score weighting analyses BMC Infectious Diseases Misdiagnosis Propensity score matching IPTW Bacteraemia Mortality |
title | Influence of initial misdiagnosis on mortality in patients with bacteraemia: propensity score matching and propensity score weighting analyses |
title_full | Influence of initial misdiagnosis on mortality in patients with bacteraemia: propensity score matching and propensity score weighting analyses |
title_fullStr | Influence of initial misdiagnosis on mortality in patients with bacteraemia: propensity score matching and propensity score weighting analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of initial misdiagnosis on mortality in patients with bacteraemia: propensity score matching and propensity score weighting analyses |
title_short | Influence of initial misdiagnosis on mortality in patients with bacteraemia: propensity score matching and propensity score weighting analyses |
title_sort | influence of initial misdiagnosis on mortality in patients with bacteraemia propensity score matching and propensity score weighting analyses |
topic | Misdiagnosis Propensity score matching IPTW Bacteraemia Mortality |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-09299-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT annameikenboom influenceofinitialmisdiagnosisonmortalityinpatientswithbacteraemiapropensityscorematchingandpropensityscoreweightinganalyses AT merelmclambregts influenceofinitialmisdiagnosisonmortalityinpatientswithbacteraemiapropensityscorematchingandpropensityscoreweightinganalyses AT markgjdeboer influenceofinitialmisdiagnosisonmortalityinpatientswithbacteraemiapropensityscorematchingandpropensityscoreweightinganalyses AT saskialecessie influenceofinitialmisdiagnosisonmortalityinpatientswithbacteraemiapropensityscorematchingandpropensityscoreweightinganalyses |