Non-operative management of blunt abdominal trauma. Is it safe and feasible in a district general hospital?

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To evaluate the feasibility and safety of non-operative management (NOM) of blunt abdominal trauma in a district general hospital with middle volume trauma case load.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Prospective protocol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giannopoulos George A, Katsoulis Iraklis E, Tzanakis Nikolaos E, Patsaouras Panayotis A, Digalakis Michalis K
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-05-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Online Access:http://www.sjtrem.com/content/17/1/22
_version_ 1818064113866113024
author Giannopoulos George A
Katsoulis Iraklis E
Tzanakis Nikolaos E
Patsaouras Panayotis A
Digalakis Michalis K
author_facet Giannopoulos George A
Katsoulis Iraklis E
Tzanakis Nikolaos E
Patsaouras Panayotis A
Digalakis Michalis K
author_sort Giannopoulos George A
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To evaluate the feasibility and safety of non-operative management (NOM) of blunt abdominal trauma in a district general hospital with middle volume trauma case load.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Prospective protocol-driven study including 30 consecutive patients who have been treated in our Department during a 30-month-period. Demographic, medical and trauma characteristics, type of treatment and outcome were examined. Patients were divided in 3 groups: those who underwent immediate laparotomy (OP group), those who had a successful NOM (NOM-S group) and those with a NOM failure (NOM-F group).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>NOM was applied in 73.3% (22 patients) of all blunt abdominal injuries with a failure rate of 13.6% (3 patients). Injury severity score (ISS), admission hematocrit, hemodynamic status and need for transfusion were significantly different between NOM and OP group. NOM failure occurred mainly in patients with splenic trauma.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>According to our experience, the hemodynamically stable or easily stabilized trauma patient can be admitted in a non-ICU ward with the provision of close monitoring. Splenic injury, especially with multiple-site free intra-abdominal fluid in abdominal computed tomography, carries a high risk for NOM failure. In this series, the main criterion for a laparotomy in a NOM patient was hemodynamic deterioration after a second rapid fluid load.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-10T14:30:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dee929bc5faf4b34abb5aec0fe114c87
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1757-7241
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T14:30:50Z
publishDate 2009-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj.art-dee929bc5faf4b34abb5aec0fe114c872022-12-22T01:44:56ZengBMCScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine1757-72412009-05-011712210.1186/1757-7241-17-22Non-operative management of blunt abdominal trauma. Is it safe and feasible in a district general hospital?Giannopoulos George AKatsoulis Iraklis ETzanakis Nikolaos EPatsaouras Panayotis ADigalakis Michalis K<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To evaluate the feasibility and safety of non-operative management (NOM) of blunt abdominal trauma in a district general hospital with middle volume trauma case load.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Prospective protocol-driven study including 30 consecutive patients who have been treated in our Department during a 30-month-period. Demographic, medical and trauma characteristics, type of treatment and outcome were examined. Patients were divided in 3 groups: those who underwent immediate laparotomy (OP group), those who had a successful NOM (NOM-S group) and those with a NOM failure (NOM-F group).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>NOM was applied in 73.3% (22 patients) of all blunt abdominal injuries with a failure rate of 13.6% (3 patients). Injury severity score (ISS), admission hematocrit, hemodynamic status and need for transfusion were significantly different between NOM and OP group. NOM failure occurred mainly in patients with splenic trauma.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>According to our experience, the hemodynamically stable or easily stabilized trauma patient can be admitted in a non-ICU ward with the provision of close monitoring. Splenic injury, especially with multiple-site free intra-abdominal fluid in abdominal computed tomography, carries a high risk for NOM failure. In this series, the main criterion for a laparotomy in a NOM patient was hemodynamic deterioration after a second rapid fluid load.</p>http://www.sjtrem.com/content/17/1/22
spellingShingle Giannopoulos George A
Katsoulis Iraklis E
Tzanakis Nikolaos E
Patsaouras Panayotis A
Digalakis Michalis K
Non-operative management of blunt abdominal trauma. Is it safe and feasible in a district general hospital?
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
title Non-operative management of blunt abdominal trauma. Is it safe and feasible in a district general hospital?
title_full Non-operative management of blunt abdominal trauma. Is it safe and feasible in a district general hospital?
title_fullStr Non-operative management of blunt abdominal trauma. Is it safe and feasible in a district general hospital?
title_full_unstemmed Non-operative management of blunt abdominal trauma. Is it safe and feasible in a district general hospital?
title_short Non-operative management of blunt abdominal trauma. Is it safe and feasible in a district general hospital?
title_sort non operative management of blunt abdominal trauma is it safe and feasible in a district general hospital
url http://www.sjtrem.com/content/17/1/22
work_keys_str_mv AT giannopoulosgeorgea nonoperativemanagementofbluntabdominaltraumaisitsafeandfeasibleinadistrictgeneralhospital
AT katsoulisiraklise nonoperativemanagementofbluntabdominaltraumaisitsafeandfeasibleinadistrictgeneralhospital
AT tzanakisnikolaose nonoperativemanagementofbluntabdominaltraumaisitsafeandfeasibleinadistrictgeneralhospital
AT patsaouraspanayotisa nonoperativemanagementofbluntabdominaltraumaisitsafeandfeasibleinadistrictgeneralhospital
AT digalakismichalisk nonoperativemanagementofbluntabdominaltraumaisitsafeandfeasibleinadistrictgeneralhospital