Mist nebulizer versus heated humidifier on endotracheal tube patency in spontaneously breathing intubated patients: A prospective, randomized controlled trial

Background and Aims: Using a humidifier in intubated patients is now a standard of care as the humidifying effect of the upper airway is lost. We conducted this study to compare the efficacy of a heated humidifier (HH) with the more commonly used conventional mist nebulizer on overnight intubated a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vijaya P Patil, Prakash Deb, Vandana Agarwal, Pavan Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-01-01
Series:Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2023;volume=39;issue=1;spage=51;epage=55;aulast=Patil
_version_ 1797774116731748352
author Vijaya P Patil
Prakash Deb
Vandana Agarwal
Pavan Kumar
author_facet Vijaya P Patil
Prakash Deb
Vandana Agarwal
Pavan Kumar
author_sort Vijaya P Patil
collection DOAJ
description Background and Aims: Using a humidifier in intubated patients is now a standard of care as the humidifying effect of the upper airway is lost. We conducted this study to compare the efficacy of a heated humidifier (HH) with the more commonly used conventional mist nebulizer on overnight intubated and spontaneously breathing post-operative patients. Material and Methods: This prospective, randomized control trial included 60 post-operative overnight intubated and spontaneously breathing patients, of which 30 patients were allocated to the HH group and 30 to the mist nebulizer group. The reduction of endotracheal tube (ETT) patency was measured quantitatively by the difference between the pre-intubation and immediate post-extubation ETT volume and compared between the two groups. Also, the characteristics of secretion, the temperature of inspired gas at the Y-piece, and the frequency of refilling the humidifier chamber were recorded and compared. Results: The reduction of ETT volume was significantly more in the mist nebulizer group compared to the HH group (P-value 0.00026). The mean temperature of the inspired gas (°C) was higher in the HH group (P-value < 0.0001). More patients in the mist nebulizer group had thicker (P-value 0.057) and drier secretions (P-value 0.005) compared to the HH group. None of the patients in the HH group required refilling of the humidifier chamber while the mean frequency of the refilling was 3.5 times per patient in the mist nebulizer group. Conclusion: HH may be preferred over mist nebulizer as the latter requires more frequent refilling which may not be practically possible in a busy recovery room rendering the patient at the risk of inhaling dry gas and consequent thick and dry secretions with decreased ETT patency.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T22:16:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-dee9eb3d99e5463f8026e0a05237d8e6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0970-9185
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T22:16:19Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
spelling doaj.art-dee9eb3d99e5463f8026e0a05237d8e62023-07-23T11:17:37ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology0970-91852023-01-01391515510.4103/joacp.joacp_121_21Mist nebulizer versus heated humidifier on endotracheal tube patency in spontaneously breathing intubated patients: A prospective, randomized controlled trialVijaya P PatilPrakash DebVandana AgarwalPavan KumarBackground and Aims: Using a humidifier in intubated patients is now a standard of care as the humidifying effect of the upper airway is lost. We conducted this study to compare the efficacy of a heated humidifier (HH) with the more commonly used conventional mist nebulizer on overnight intubated and spontaneously breathing post-operative patients. Material and Methods: This prospective, randomized control trial included 60 post-operative overnight intubated and spontaneously breathing patients, of which 30 patients were allocated to the HH group and 30 to the mist nebulizer group. The reduction of endotracheal tube (ETT) patency was measured quantitatively by the difference between the pre-intubation and immediate post-extubation ETT volume and compared between the two groups. Also, the characteristics of secretion, the temperature of inspired gas at the Y-piece, and the frequency of refilling the humidifier chamber were recorded and compared. Results: The reduction of ETT volume was significantly more in the mist nebulizer group compared to the HH group (P-value 0.00026). The mean temperature of the inspired gas (°C) was higher in the HH group (P-value < 0.0001). More patients in the mist nebulizer group had thicker (P-value 0.057) and drier secretions (P-value 0.005) compared to the HH group. None of the patients in the HH group required refilling of the humidifier chamber while the mean frequency of the refilling was 3.5 times per patient in the mist nebulizer group. Conclusion: HH may be preferred over mist nebulizer as the latter requires more frequent refilling which may not be practically possible in a busy recovery room rendering the patient at the risk of inhaling dry gas and consequent thick and dry secretions with decreased ETT patency.http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2023;volume=39;issue=1;spage=51;epage=55;aulast=Patilendotracheal tubeheated humidifiermist nebulizersecretioninspired gasy-piece
spellingShingle Vijaya P Patil
Prakash Deb
Vandana Agarwal
Pavan Kumar
Mist nebulizer versus heated humidifier on endotracheal tube patency in spontaneously breathing intubated patients: A prospective, randomized controlled trial
Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
endotracheal tube
heated humidifier
mist nebulizer
secretion
inspired gas
y-piece
title Mist nebulizer versus heated humidifier on endotracheal tube patency in spontaneously breathing intubated patients: A prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_full Mist nebulizer versus heated humidifier on endotracheal tube patency in spontaneously breathing intubated patients: A prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Mist nebulizer versus heated humidifier on endotracheal tube patency in spontaneously breathing intubated patients: A prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Mist nebulizer versus heated humidifier on endotracheal tube patency in spontaneously breathing intubated patients: A prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_short Mist nebulizer versus heated humidifier on endotracheal tube patency in spontaneously breathing intubated patients: A prospective, randomized controlled trial
title_sort mist nebulizer versus heated humidifier on endotracheal tube patency in spontaneously breathing intubated patients a prospective randomized controlled trial
topic endotracheal tube
heated humidifier
mist nebulizer
secretion
inspired gas
y-piece
url http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2023;volume=39;issue=1;spage=51;epage=55;aulast=Patil
work_keys_str_mv AT vijayappatil mistnebulizerversusheatedhumidifieronendotrachealtubepatencyinspontaneouslybreathingintubatedpatientsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT prakashdeb mistnebulizerversusheatedhumidifieronendotrachealtubepatencyinspontaneouslybreathingintubatedpatientsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandanaagarwal mistnebulizerversusheatedhumidifieronendotrachealtubepatencyinspontaneouslybreathingintubatedpatientsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pavankumar mistnebulizerversusheatedhumidifieronendotrachealtubepatencyinspontaneouslybreathingintubatedpatientsaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial