What Makes an Argument Strong?
It is widely believed that Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s theory of argumentation is vulnerable to the charge of relativism. This paper provides a more charitable interpretation of Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s normative views, one that properly considers the historical trajectory of their work...
Main Author: | Blake D. Scott |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Windsor
2024-03-01
|
Series: | Informal Logic |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/8222 |
Similar Items
-
The Social Nature of Argumentative Practices: The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception
by: Paula Olmos
Published: (2018-03-01) -
Perelman, Informal Logic and the Historicity of Reason
by: Christopher W. Tindale
Published: (2008-02-01) -
Written Argumentation for Different Audiences. A Study of Addressivity and the Uses of Arguments in Argumentative Student Texts
by: Hege Myklebust, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01) -
The Excellence Award at the Fonds Ricœur’s Summer Workshop 2021 - “Ricœur rhétorique. The Missed Encounter with Chaïm Perelman in The Rule of Metaphor”
by: Blake D. Scott
Published: (2021-12-01) -
Studying Rhetorical Audiences – a Call for Qualitative Reception Studies in Argumentation and Rhetoric
by: Jens Elmelund Kjeldsen
Published: (2016-07-01)