To test or not to test: A cross-sectional survey of the psychosocial determinants of self-testing for cholesterol, glucose, and HIV

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Although self-tests are increasingly available and widely used, it is not clear whether their use is beneficial to the users, and little is known concerning the determinants of self-test use. The aim of this study was to identify the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dinant Geert-Jan, Ronda Gaby, Grispen Janaica EJ, de Vries Nanne K, van der Weijden Trudy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-02-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/112
_version_ 1818114334431117312
author Dinant Geert-Jan
Ronda Gaby
Grispen Janaica EJ
de Vries Nanne K
van der Weijden Trudy
author_facet Dinant Geert-Jan
Ronda Gaby
Grispen Janaica EJ
de Vries Nanne K
van der Weijden Trudy
author_sort Dinant Geert-Jan
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Although self-tests are increasingly available and widely used, it is not clear whether their use is beneficial to the users, and little is known concerning the determinants of self-test use. The aim of this study was to identify the determinants of self-test use for cholesterol, glucose, and HIV, and to examine whether these are similar across these tests. Self-testing was defined as using in-vitro tests on body materials, initiated by consumers with the aim of diagnosing a particular disorder, condition, or risk factor for disease.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A cross-sectional Internet survey was conducted among 513 self-testers and 600 non-testers, assessing possible determinants of self-test use. The structured questionnaire was based on the Health Belief Model, Theory of Planned Behavior, and Protection Motivation Theory. Data were analyzed by means of logistic regression.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The results revealed that perceived benefits and self-efficacy were significantly associated with self-testing for all three conditions. Other psychosocial determinants, e.g. gender, cues to action, perceived barriers, subjective norm, and moral obligation, seemed to be more test-specific.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Psychosocial determinants of self-testing are not identical for all tests and therefore information about self-testing needs to be tailored to a specific test. The general public should not only be informed about advantages of self-test use but also about the disadvantages. Designers of information about self-testing should address all aspects related to self-testing to stimulate informed decision making which, in turn, will result in more effective self-test use.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-11T03:49:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-defbb1d7ca114994895c3dedf7137b4d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T03:49:05Z
publishDate 2011-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-defbb1d7ca114994895c3dedf7137b4d2022-12-22T01:21:57ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582011-02-0111111210.1186/1471-2458-11-112To test or not to test: A cross-sectional survey of the psychosocial determinants of self-testing for cholesterol, glucose, and HIVDinant Geert-JanRonda GabyGrispen Janaica EJde Vries Nanne Kvan der Weijden Trudy<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Although self-tests are increasingly available and widely used, it is not clear whether their use is beneficial to the users, and little is known concerning the determinants of self-test use. The aim of this study was to identify the determinants of self-test use for cholesterol, glucose, and HIV, and to examine whether these are similar across these tests. Self-testing was defined as using in-vitro tests on body materials, initiated by consumers with the aim of diagnosing a particular disorder, condition, or risk factor for disease.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A cross-sectional Internet survey was conducted among 513 self-testers and 600 non-testers, assessing possible determinants of self-test use. The structured questionnaire was based on the Health Belief Model, Theory of Planned Behavior, and Protection Motivation Theory. Data were analyzed by means of logistic regression.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The results revealed that perceived benefits and self-efficacy were significantly associated with self-testing for all three conditions. Other psychosocial determinants, e.g. gender, cues to action, perceived barriers, subjective norm, and moral obligation, seemed to be more test-specific.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Psychosocial determinants of self-testing are not identical for all tests and therefore information about self-testing needs to be tailored to a specific test. The general public should not only be informed about advantages of self-test use but also about the disadvantages. Designers of information about self-testing should address all aspects related to self-testing to stimulate informed decision making which, in turn, will result in more effective self-test use.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/112
spellingShingle Dinant Geert-Jan
Ronda Gaby
Grispen Janaica EJ
de Vries Nanne K
van der Weijden Trudy
To test or not to test: A cross-sectional survey of the psychosocial determinants of self-testing for cholesterol, glucose, and HIV
BMC Public Health
title To test or not to test: A cross-sectional survey of the psychosocial determinants of self-testing for cholesterol, glucose, and HIV
title_full To test or not to test: A cross-sectional survey of the psychosocial determinants of self-testing for cholesterol, glucose, and HIV
title_fullStr To test or not to test: A cross-sectional survey of the psychosocial determinants of self-testing for cholesterol, glucose, and HIV
title_full_unstemmed To test or not to test: A cross-sectional survey of the psychosocial determinants of self-testing for cholesterol, glucose, and HIV
title_short To test or not to test: A cross-sectional survey of the psychosocial determinants of self-testing for cholesterol, glucose, and HIV
title_sort to test or not to test a cross sectional survey of the psychosocial determinants of self testing for cholesterol glucose and hiv
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/112
work_keys_str_mv AT dinantgeertjan totestornottotestacrosssectionalsurveyofthepsychosocialdeterminantsofselftestingforcholesterolglucoseandhiv
AT rondagaby totestornottotestacrosssectionalsurveyofthepsychosocialdeterminantsofselftestingforcholesterolglucoseandhiv
AT grispenjanaicaej totestornottotestacrosssectionalsurveyofthepsychosocialdeterminantsofselftestingforcholesterolglucoseandhiv
AT devriesnannek totestornottotestacrosssectionalsurveyofthepsychosocialdeterminantsofselftestingforcholesterolglucoseandhiv
AT vanderweijdentrudy totestornottotestacrosssectionalsurveyofthepsychosocialdeterminantsofselftestingforcholesterolglucoseandhiv