To test or not to test: A cross-sectional survey of the psychosocial determinants of self-testing for cholesterol, glucose, and HIV
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Although self-tests are increasingly available and widely used, it is not clear whether their use is beneficial to the users, and little is known concerning the determinants of self-test use. The aim of this study was to identify the...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2011-02-01
|
Series: | BMC Public Health |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/112 |
_version_ | 1818114334431117312 |
---|---|
author | Dinant Geert-Jan Ronda Gaby Grispen Janaica EJ de Vries Nanne K van der Weijden Trudy |
author_facet | Dinant Geert-Jan Ronda Gaby Grispen Janaica EJ de Vries Nanne K van der Weijden Trudy |
author_sort | Dinant Geert-Jan |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Although self-tests are increasingly available and widely used, it is not clear whether their use is beneficial to the users, and little is known concerning the determinants of self-test use. The aim of this study was to identify the determinants of self-test use for cholesterol, glucose, and HIV, and to examine whether these are similar across these tests. Self-testing was defined as using in-vitro tests on body materials, initiated by consumers with the aim of diagnosing a particular disorder, condition, or risk factor for disease.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A cross-sectional Internet survey was conducted among 513 self-testers and 600 non-testers, assessing possible determinants of self-test use. The structured questionnaire was based on the Health Belief Model, Theory of Planned Behavior, and Protection Motivation Theory. Data were analyzed by means of logistic regression.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The results revealed that perceived benefits and self-efficacy were significantly associated with self-testing for all three conditions. Other psychosocial determinants, e.g. gender, cues to action, perceived barriers, subjective norm, and moral obligation, seemed to be more test-specific.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Psychosocial determinants of self-testing are not identical for all tests and therefore information about self-testing needs to be tailored to a specific test. The general public should not only be informed about advantages of self-test use but also about the disadvantages. Designers of information about self-testing should address all aspects related to self-testing to stimulate informed decision making which, in turn, will result in more effective self-test use.</p> |
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T03:49:05Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-defbb1d7ca114994895c3dedf7137b4d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1471-2458 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T03:49:05Z |
publishDate | 2011-02-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Public Health |
spelling | doaj.art-defbb1d7ca114994895c3dedf7137b4d2022-12-22T01:21:57ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582011-02-0111111210.1186/1471-2458-11-112To test or not to test: A cross-sectional survey of the psychosocial determinants of self-testing for cholesterol, glucose, and HIVDinant Geert-JanRonda GabyGrispen Janaica EJde Vries Nanne Kvan der Weijden Trudy<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Although self-tests are increasingly available and widely used, it is not clear whether their use is beneficial to the users, and little is known concerning the determinants of self-test use. The aim of this study was to identify the determinants of self-test use for cholesterol, glucose, and HIV, and to examine whether these are similar across these tests. Self-testing was defined as using in-vitro tests on body materials, initiated by consumers with the aim of diagnosing a particular disorder, condition, or risk factor for disease.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A cross-sectional Internet survey was conducted among 513 self-testers and 600 non-testers, assessing possible determinants of self-test use. The structured questionnaire was based on the Health Belief Model, Theory of Planned Behavior, and Protection Motivation Theory. Data were analyzed by means of logistic regression.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The results revealed that perceived benefits and self-efficacy were significantly associated with self-testing for all three conditions. Other psychosocial determinants, e.g. gender, cues to action, perceived barriers, subjective norm, and moral obligation, seemed to be more test-specific.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Psychosocial determinants of self-testing are not identical for all tests and therefore information about self-testing needs to be tailored to a specific test. The general public should not only be informed about advantages of self-test use but also about the disadvantages. Designers of information about self-testing should address all aspects related to self-testing to stimulate informed decision making which, in turn, will result in more effective self-test use.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/112 |
spellingShingle | Dinant Geert-Jan Ronda Gaby Grispen Janaica EJ de Vries Nanne K van der Weijden Trudy To test or not to test: A cross-sectional survey of the psychosocial determinants of self-testing for cholesterol, glucose, and HIV BMC Public Health |
title | To test or not to test: A cross-sectional survey of the psychosocial determinants of self-testing for cholesterol, glucose, and HIV |
title_full | To test or not to test: A cross-sectional survey of the psychosocial determinants of self-testing for cholesterol, glucose, and HIV |
title_fullStr | To test or not to test: A cross-sectional survey of the psychosocial determinants of self-testing for cholesterol, glucose, and HIV |
title_full_unstemmed | To test or not to test: A cross-sectional survey of the psychosocial determinants of self-testing for cholesterol, glucose, and HIV |
title_short | To test or not to test: A cross-sectional survey of the psychosocial determinants of self-testing for cholesterol, glucose, and HIV |
title_sort | to test or not to test a cross sectional survey of the psychosocial determinants of self testing for cholesterol glucose and hiv |
url | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/112 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dinantgeertjan totestornottotestacrosssectionalsurveyofthepsychosocialdeterminantsofselftestingforcholesterolglucoseandhiv AT rondagaby totestornottotestacrosssectionalsurveyofthepsychosocialdeterminantsofselftestingforcholesterolglucoseandhiv AT grispenjanaicaej totestornottotestacrosssectionalsurveyofthepsychosocialdeterminantsofselftestingforcholesterolglucoseandhiv AT devriesnannek totestornottotestacrosssectionalsurveyofthepsychosocialdeterminantsofselftestingforcholesterolglucoseandhiv AT vanderweijdentrudy totestornottotestacrosssectionalsurveyofthepsychosocialdeterminantsofselftestingforcholesterolglucoseandhiv |