Extension of krugman’s comparative advantage model: Blessed fuels and cursed metals

<p>Krugman’s dynamic comparative advantage model deals with spending effect from resource dividends. In its original setup dividends from resource export result in higher relative wages and therefore the Home country loses its production share to the Foreign country. <br />The model had...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bayarmaa D
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mongolian Academy of Sciences 2018-04-01
Series:Proceedings of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mongoliajol.info/index.php/PMAS/article/view/975
_version_ 1811234409890709504
author Bayarmaa D
author_facet Bayarmaa D
author_sort Bayarmaa D
collection DOAJ
description <p>Krugman’s dynamic comparative advantage model deals with spending effect from resource dividends. In its original setup dividends from resource export result in higher relative wages and therefore the Home country loses its production share to the Foreign country. <br />The model had minor modifications so Home country has natural resources that can be either exported or used in production of traded goods. The learning is associated only with non-resource part of traded good production, and therefore the specialization range for resource producing country is narrower consequently it can easily lose it production share to Foreign country. As alternative to raw export the country can utilize its resources in production of traded goods. <br />In that case, it is possible to reduce relative wages through change in demand for imported traded goods. Compared to fuel exporters, metal exporters are more vulnerable to losing their production share, and metal processing countries are much stronger in keeping their shares in the world production. From extension of Krugman’s comparative advantage model it follows that existence of large resource extractive sector would result in loss of comparative advantage more easily compared with country that have small resource sector. <br />Distribution of resource wealth as pure transfers results in loss of domestic industries to foreign country. In contrast, utilizing resources as inputs and producing import substituting goods, while changing domestic demand preferences for traded and non-traded goods would have positive outcomes for the comparative advantage.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-12T11:35:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-deff5823d79e4e64883fa2a742b34342
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2310-4716
2312-2994
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T11:35:45Z
publishDate 2018-04-01
publisher Mongolian Academy of Sciences
record_format Article
series Proceedings of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences
spelling doaj.art-deff5823d79e4e64883fa2a742b343422022-12-22T03:34:50ZengMongolian Academy of SciencesProceedings of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences2310-47162312-29942018-04-015819310610.5564/pmas.v58i1.975928Extension of krugman’s comparative advantage model: Blessed fuels and cursed metalsBayarmaa D0School of Business Administration and Humanities Mongolian University of Science and Technology<p>Krugman’s dynamic comparative advantage model deals with spending effect from resource dividends. In its original setup dividends from resource export result in higher relative wages and therefore the Home country loses its production share to the Foreign country. <br />The model had minor modifications so Home country has natural resources that can be either exported or used in production of traded goods. The learning is associated only with non-resource part of traded good production, and therefore the specialization range for resource producing country is narrower consequently it can easily lose it production share to Foreign country. As alternative to raw export the country can utilize its resources in production of traded goods. <br />In that case, it is possible to reduce relative wages through change in demand for imported traded goods. Compared to fuel exporters, metal exporters are more vulnerable to losing their production share, and metal processing countries are much stronger in keeping their shares in the world production. From extension of Krugman’s comparative advantage model it follows that existence of large resource extractive sector would result in loss of comparative advantage more easily compared with country that have small resource sector. <br />Distribution of resource wealth as pure transfers results in loss of domestic industries to foreign country. In contrast, utilizing resources as inputs and producing import substituting goods, while changing domestic demand preferences for traded and non-traded goods would have positive outcomes for the comparative advantage.</p>https://www.mongoliajol.info/index.php/PMAS/article/view/975Dutch diseasenatural resourcesspecializationtraded goodsnon-traded goods
spellingShingle Bayarmaa D
Extension of krugman’s comparative advantage model: Blessed fuels and cursed metals
Proceedings of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences
Dutch disease
natural resources
specialization
traded goods
non-traded goods
title Extension of krugman’s comparative advantage model: Blessed fuels and cursed metals
title_full Extension of krugman’s comparative advantage model: Blessed fuels and cursed metals
title_fullStr Extension of krugman’s comparative advantage model: Blessed fuels and cursed metals
title_full_unstemmed Extension of krugman’s comparative advantage model: Blessed fuels and cursed metals
title_short Extension of krugman’s comparative advantage model: Blessed fuels and cursed metals
title_sort extension of krugman s comparative advantage model blessed fuels and cursed metals
topic Dutch disease
natural resources
specialization
traded goods
non-traded goods
url https://www.mongoliajol.info/index.php/PMAS/article/view/975
work_keys_str_mv AT bayarmaad extensionofkrugmanscomparativeadvantagemodelblessedfuelsandcursedmetals