No thank you, not today": Supporting Ethical and Professional Relationships in Large Qualitative Studies

Based on an ongoing research study of the development of self-regulation in early childhood (BOYER, 2005a, 2005b; BOYER, BLODGETT, & TURK, 2004), this work explores both the ethical and professional considerations of participant sampling in a large qualitative study. The study involved 146 famil...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lisa J. Blodgett, Wanda Boyer, Emily Turk
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: FQS 2005-09-01
Series:Forum: Qualitative Social Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/31
_version_ 1819035280610426880
author Lisa J. Blodgett
Wanda Boyer
Emily Turk
author_facet Lisa J. Blodgett
Wanda Boyer
Emily Turk
author_sort Lisa J. Blodgett
collection DOAJ
description Based on an ongoing research study of the development of self-regulation in early childhood (BOYER, 2005a, 2005b; BOYER, BLODGETT, & TURK, 2004), this work explores both the ethical and professional considerations of participant sampling in a large qualitative study. The study involved 146 families of preschool children and 15 educators across 7 preschools. Data collection included 30-45 minute audiotaped individual interviews, twenty-eight 90-120 minute audiotaped focus group sessions, and 30 minute videotaped footage of each child's natural play. The challenge of gaining informed consent and ongoing participation within a large study has been considered in the literature (GALL, GALL, & BORG, 2005). In qualitative studies the participants are selected purposefully because they will be par­ticularly informative about the topic (CRESWELL, 2002). This is a challenge for qualitative re­searchers seeking maximal participation and large sample sizes because volunteer participants "tend to be better educated, higher socioeconomically, more intelligent, more in need of social approval, more sociable, more unconventional, less auth­ori­tarian, and less conforming than nonvolunteers" (MCMILLAN, 2004, p.116). This paper provides a response to these sampling challenges and ad­vo­cates for the building of community relationships based on ethical, interpersonal and professional foundations. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0503353
first_indexed 2024-12-21T07:47:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-df1384e09f3b41c08410d9b6a04272d4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1438-5627
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-21T07:47:07Z
publishDate 2005-09-01
publisher FQS
record_format Article
series Forum: Qualitative Social Research
spelling doaj.art-df1384e09f3b41c08410d9b6a04272d42022-12-21T19:11:11ZdeuFQSForum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272005-09-016330No thank you, not today": Supporting Ethical and Professional Relationships in Large Qualitative StudiesLisa J. Blodgett0Wanda Boyer1Emily Turk2University of VictoriaUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of VictoriaBased on an ongoing research study of the development of self-regulation in early childhood (BOYER, 2005a, 2005b; BOYER, BLODGETT, & TURK, 2004), this work explores both the ethical and professional considerations of participant sampling in a large qualitative study. The study involved 146 families of preschool children and 15 educators across 7 preschools. Data collection included 30-45 minute audiotaped individual interviews, twenty-eight 90-120 minute audiotaped focus group sessions, and 30 minute videotaped footage of each child's natural play. The challenge of gaining informed consent and ongoing participation within a large study has been considered in the literature (GALL, GALL, & BORG, 2005). In qualitative studies the participants are selected purposefully because they will be par­ticularly informative about the topic (CRESWELL, 2002). This is a challenge for qualitative re­searchers seeking maximal participation and large sample sizes because volunteer participants "tend to be better educated, higher socioeconomically, more intelligent, more in need of social approval, more sociable, more unconventional, less auth­ori­tarian, and less conforming than nonvolunteers" (MCMILLAN, 2004, p.116). This paper provides a response to these sampling challenges and ad­vo­cates for the building of community relationships based on ethical, interpersonal and professional foundations. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0503353http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/31ethicsqualitative researchpowerinformed consentvulnerable populationsinsider-outsider relationshipsself-regulation
spellingShingle Lisa J. Blodgett
Wanda Boyer
Emily Turk
No thank you, not today": Supporting Ethical and Professional Relationships in Large Qualitative Studies
Forum: Qualitative Social Research
ethics
qualitative research
power
informed consent
vulnerable populations
insider-outsider relationships
self-regulation
title No thank you, not today": Supporting Ethical and Professional Relationships in Large Qualitative Studies
title_full No thank you, not today": Supporting Ethical and Professional Relationships in Large Qualitative Studies
title_fullStr No thank you, not today": Supporting Ethical and Professional Relationships in Large Qualitative Studies
title_full_unstemmed No thank you, not today": Supporting Ethical and Professional Relationships in Large Qualitative Studies
title_short No thank you, not today": Supporting Ethical and Professional Relationships in Large Qualitative Studies
title_sort no thank you not today supporting ethical and professional relationships in large qualitative studies
topic ethics
qualitative research
power
informed consent
vulnerable populations
insider-outsider relationships
self-regulation
url http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/31
work_keys_str_mv AT lisajblodgett nothankyounottodaysupportingethicalandprofessionalrelationshipsinlargequalitativestudies
AT wandaboyer nothankyounottodaysupportingethicalandprofessionalrelationshipsinlargequalitativestudies
AT emilyturk nothankyounottodaysupportingethicalandprofessionalrelationshipsinlargequalitativestudies