Procedural sedation and analgesia versus nerve blocks for reduction of fractures and dislocations in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract Background Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) and peripheral nerve blocks (NBs) are techniques to manage pain and facilitate reduction of dislocated joints or fractures. However, it is unclear if either approach provides any distinct advantage in the emergency department (ED). The aim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maybritt I. Kuypers, Lars I. Veldhuis, Francis Mencl, Anne vanRiel, Wendy A. M. H. Thijssen, Ellen Tromp, J. Carel Goslings, Frans B. Plötz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-02-01
Series:Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12886
_version_ 1797843811484827648
author Maybritt I. Kuypers
Lars I. Veldhuis
Francis Mencl
Anne vanRiel
Wendy A. M. H. Thijssen
Ellen Tromp
J. Carel Goslings
Frans B. Plötz
author_facet Maybritt I. Kuypers
Lars I. Veldhuis
Francis Mencl
Anne vanRiel
Wendy A. M. H. Thijssen
Ellen Tromp
J. Carel Goslings
Frans B. Plötz
author_sort Maybritt I. Kuypers
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) and peripheral nerve blocks (NBs) are techniques to manage pain and facilitate reduction of dislocated joints or fractures. However, it is unclear if either approach provides any distinct advantage in the emergency department (ED). The aim of this systematic review is to compare these 2 techniques on pain scores, adverse events, patient satisfaction, and length of stay (LOS) in the ED. Methods We performed an electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, and references were hand‐searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PSA with NBs for orthopedic reductions in the ED were included. Outcomes of interest included pain scores, adverse events, patient satisfaction, and LOS in the ED. A total of 2 reviewers independently screened abstracts and extracted data into a standardized form. The Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool was used to evaluate study quality. The Grading of Recommendation Assessment Development and Evaluation approach was used to assess the certainty and strength of the evidence. Data on pain scores were pooled using a random‐effects model and are reported as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results A total of 6 RCTs (n = 256) were included in a qualitative review, and 4 RCTs (n = 101) were included in the meta‐analysis. There was no significant difference in pain scores between the PSA and NB groups (P = 0.47; SMD, 0.45; 95% CI, −0.78 to 1.69; I2 = 0.94). There were less adverse events in the NB group (0%–3.3%) compared with the PSA group (0%–20%; n = 256). LOS times were consistently shorter in the NB group (n = 215). Patient satisfaction was comparable in both groups (n = 196). Conclusion Based on the available evidence, NBs performed by emergency physicians are as effective as PSA in managing pain during orthopedic reductions in the ED. NBs are associated with fewer adverse events and shorter LOS in the ED. The quality of evidence is low.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T17:12:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-df153299e46f481bb00ee280d366f437
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2688-1152
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T17:12:00Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
spelling doaj.art-df153299e46f481bb00ee280d366f4372023-04-20T05:51:41ZengWileyJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open2688-11522023-02-0141n/an/a10.1002/emp2.12886Procedural sedation and analgesia versus nerve blocks for reduction of fractures and dislocations in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta‐analysisMaybritt I. Kuypers0Lars I. Veldhuis1Francis Mencl2Anne vanRiel3Wendy A. M. H. Thijssen4Ellen Tromp5J. Carel Goslings6Frans B. Plötz7Department of Emergency Medicine Amsterdam University Medical Center location Academisch Medisch Centrum Amsterdam the NetherlandsDepartment of Anesthesiology Amsterdam University Medical Center location Academisch Medisch Centrum Amsterdam the NetherlandsDepartment of Emergency Medicine Penn State University Milton Hershey Medical Center Hershey Pennsylvania USADepartment of Emergency Medicine Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven the NetherlandsDepartment of Emergency Medicine Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven the NetherlandsDepartment of Epidemiology and Statistics Sint Antonius Ziekenhuis Nieuwegein the NetherlandsDepartment of Traumatology Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis Amsterdam the NetherlandsDepartment of Pediatrics Tergooi Ziekenhuis Blaricum the NetherlandsAbstract Background Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) and peripheral nerve blocks (NBs) are techniques to manage pain and facilitate reduction of dislocated joints or fractures. However, it is unclear if either approach provides any distinct advantage in the emergency department (ED). The aim of this systematic review is to compare these 2 techniques on pain scores, adverse events, patient satisfaction, and length of stay (LOS) in the ED. Methods We performed an electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, and references were hand‐searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PSA with NBs for orthopedic reductions in the ED were included. Outcomes of interest included pain scores, adverse events, patient satisfaction, and LOS in the ED. A total of 2 reviewers independently screened abstracts and extracted data into a standardized form. The Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool was used to evaluate study quality. The Grading of Recommendation Assessment Development and Evaluation approach was used to assess the certainty and strength of the evidence. Data on pain scores were pooled using a random‐effects model and are reported as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results A total of 6 RCTs (n = 256) were included in a qualitative review, and 4 RCTs (n = 101) were included in the meta‐analysis. There was no significant difference in pain scores between the PSA and NB groups (P = 0.47; SMD, 0.45; 95% CI, −0.78 to 1.69; I2 = 0.94). There were less adverse events in the NB group (0%–3.3%) compared with the PSA group (0%–20%; n = 256). LOS times were consistently shorter in the NB group (n = 215). Patient satisfaction was comparable in both groups (n = 196). Conclusion Based on the available evidence, NBs performed by emergency physicians are as effective as PSA in managing pain during orthopedic reductions in the ED. NBs are associated with fewer adverse events and shorter LOS in the ED. The quality of evidence is low.https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12886adverse eventanalgesiadislocationemergency (medicine)fracturelength of stay
spellingShingle Maybritt I. Kuypers
Lars I. Veldhuis
Francis Mencl
Anne vanRiel
Wendy A. M. H. Thijssen
Ellen Tromp
J. Carel Goslings
Frans B. Plötz
Procedural sedation and analgesia versus nerve blocks for reduction of fractures and dislocations in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
adverse event
analgesia
dislocation
emergency (medicine)
fracture
length of stay
title Procedural sedation and analgesia versus nerve blocks for reduction of fractures and dislocations in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Procedural sedation and analgesia versus nerve blocks for reduction of fractures and dislocations in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Procedural sedation and analgesia versus nerve blocks for reduction of fractures and dislocations in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Procedural sedation and analgesia versus nerve blocks for reduction of fractures and dislocations in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Procedural sedation and analgesia versus nerve blocks for reduction of fractures and dislocations in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort procedural sedation and analgesia versus nerve blocks for reduction of fractures and dislocations in the emergency department a systematic review and meta analysis
topic adverse event
analgesia
dislocation
emergency (medicine)
fracture
length of stay
url https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12886
work_keys_str_mv AT maybrittikuypers proceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusnerveblocksforreductionoffracturesanddislocationsintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT larsiveldhuis proceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusnerveblocksforreductionoffracturesanddislocationsintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT francismencl proceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusnerveblocksforreductionoffracturesanddislocationsintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT annevanriel proceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusnerveblocksforreductionoffracturesanddislocationsintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wendyamhthijssen proceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusnerveblocksforreductionoffracturesanddislocationsintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ellentromp proceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusnerveblocksforreductionoffracturesanddislocationsintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jcarelgoslings proceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusnerveblocksforreductionoffracturesanddislocationsintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fransbplotz proceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusnerveblocksforreductionoffracturesanddislocationsintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis