Effect of different combinations of surface treatment on adhesion of resin composite to zirconia

Jihad Saade,1 Hasan Skienhe,2 Hani Ounsi,3 Jukka P Matinlinna,4 Ziad Salameh51Faculty of Dental Medicine, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon; 2Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon; 3Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Facul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saade J, Skienhe H, Ounsi H, Matinlinna JP, Salameh Z
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2019-05-01
Series:Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/effect-of-different-combinations-of-surface-treatment-on-adhesion-of-r-peer-reviewed-article-CCIDE
_version_ 1818648750191542272
author Saade J
Skienhe H
Ounsi H
Matinlinna JP
Salameh Z
author_facet Saade J
Skienhe H
Ounsi H
Matinlinna JP
Salameh Z
author_sort Saade J
collection DOAJ
description Jihad Saade,1 Hasan Skienhe,2 Hani Ounsi,3 Jukka P Matinlinna,4 Ziad Salameh51Faculty of Dental Medicine, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon; 2Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon; 3Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon; 4Dental Materials Science, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong, Sai Ying Pun, Hong Kong; 5Research Center, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Lebanese University, Beirut, LebanonPurpose: The purpose of this laboratory study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatment combinations on resin zirconia bonding.Materials and methods: One hundred and five pre-sintered zirconia quadrangles were prepared out of zirconia blocks, polished, then sintered and divided into five groups (n=21). Group I (control): samples were untreated, group II: grit-blasting with 50 μm alumina particles, group III: grit-blasting with 100 μm alumina particles, group IV: Er,Cr:YSGG laser, and group V: selective infiltration etching technique. Microstructural analysis was performed using scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, a diffractometer, and a profilometer. Cylinders of composite resin were luted with Panavia resin composite cementand Clearfil ceramic primer. Shear bond strength (SBS) was determined using a universal testing machine.Results: SBS results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc tests for multiple comparisons. The level of significance was set to 0.05. SBS values of the studied groups II, III, IV, and V were 16.2±1.8 MPa, 15.7±3.7 MPa, 14.8±3.4 MPa, and 16.8±3.0 MPa, respectively. All values were significantly higher than the control group (10.48±1.80 MPa), but without a significant difference between them. Group III exhibited the roughest surface, and Group I had a more significantly reduced surface roughness value than any other group. Group III presented the highest significant increase of tetragonal to monoclinic phase transformation (13%).Conclusion: The use of grit-blasting with greater particles size enhanced SBS with resin composite cement, but induced a higher amount of monoclinic phase transformation. The use of primer based on adhesive monomer with the resin cement is required to enhance the bonding efficiency. The use of laser enhanced the surface roughness and the bonding ability to zirconia.Keywords: air abrasion, laser, MDP primer, resin cement
first_indexed 2024-12-17T01:23:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-df160991359f4b7ba5ddf26803d32665
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1179-1357
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T01:23:23Z
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry
spelling doaj.art-df160991359f4b7ba5ddf26803d326652022-12-21T22:08:46ZengDove Medical PressClinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry1179-13572019-05-01Volume 1111912946105Effect of different combinations of surface treatment on adhesion of resin composite to zirconiaSaade JSkienhe HOunsi HMatinlinna JPSalameh ZJihad Saade,1 Hasan Skienhe,2 Hani Ounsi,3 Jukka P Matinlinna,4 Ziad Salameh51Faculty of Dental Medicine, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon; 2Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon; 3Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon; 4Dental Materials Science, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong, Sai Ying Pun, Hong Kong; 5Research Center, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Lebanese University, Beirut, LebanonPurpose: The purpose of this laboratory study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatment combinations on resin zirconia bonding.Materials and methods: One hundred and five pre-sintered zirconia quadrangles were prepared out of zirconia blocks, polished, then sintered and divided into five groups (n=21). Group I (control): samples were untreated, group II: grit-blasting with 50 μm alumina particles, group III: grit-blasting with 100 μm alumina particles, group IV: Er,Cr:YSGG laser, and group V: selective infiltration etching technique. Microstructural analysis was performed using scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, a diffractometer, and a profilometer. Cylinders of composite resin were luted with Panavia resin composite cementand Clearfil ceramic primer. Shear bond strength (SBS) was determined using a universal testing machine.Results: SBS results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc tests for multiple comparisons. The level of significance was set to 0.05. SBS values of the studied groups II, III, IV, and V were 16.2±1.8 MPa, 15.7±3.7 MPa, 14.8±3.4 MPa, and 16.8±3.0 MPa, respectively. All values were significantly higher than the control group (10.48±1.80 MPa), but without a significant difference between them. Group III exhibited the roughest surface, and Group I had a more significantly reduced surface roughness value than any other group. Group III presented the highest significant increase of tetragonal to monoclinic phase transformation (13%).Conclusion: The use of grit-blasting with greater particles size enhanced SBS with resin composite cement, but induced a higher amount of monoclinic phase transformation. The use of primer based on adhesive monomer with the resin cement is required to enhance the bonding efficiency. The use of laser enhanced the surface roughness and the bonding ability to zirconia.Keywords: air abrasion, laser, MDP primer, resin cementhttps://www.dovepress.com/effect-of-different-combinations-of-surface-treatment-on-adhesion-of-r-peer-reviewed-article-CCIDEAir abrasionLaserMDP primerresin cement
spellingShingle Saade J
Skienhe H
Ounsi H
Matinlinna JP
Salameh Z
Effect of different combinations of surface treatment on adhesion of resin composite to zirconia
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry
Air abrasion
Laser
MDP primer
resin cement
title Effect of different combinations of surface treatment on adhesion of resin composite to zirconia
title_full Effect of different combinations of surface treatment on adhesion of resin composite to zirconia
title_fullStr Effect of different combinations of surface treatment on adhesion of resin composite to zirconia
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different combinations of surface treatment on adhesion of resin composite to zirconia
title_short Effect of different combinations of surface treatment on adhesion of resin composite to zirconia
title_sort effect of different combinations of surface treatment on adhesion of resin composite to zirconia
topic Air abrasion
Laser
MDP primer
resin cement
url https://www.dovepress.com/effect-of-different-combinations-of-surface-treatment-on-adhesion-of-r-peer-reviewed-article-CCIDE
work_keys_str_mv AT saadej effectofdifferentcombinationsofsurfacetreatmentonadhesionofresincompositetozirconia
AT skienheh effectofdifferentcombinationsofsurfacetreatmentonadhesionofresincompositetozirconia
AT ounsih effectofdifferentcombinationsofsurfacetreatmentonadhesionofresincompositetozirconia
AT matinlinnajp effectofdifferentcombinationsofsurfacetreatmentonadhesionofresincompositetozirconia
AT salamehz effectofdifferentcombinationsofsurfacetreatmentonadhesionofresincompositetozirconia