Comparison of Resorbable Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration of Human and Bovine Origin

The properties of membranes for guided bone regeneration have been described by a number of authors. These involve biocompatibility, appropriate barrier features (mechanical prevention of soft tissue proliferation), tissue integration, immunologic neutrality, preservation of the space for new alveol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zoran Lazić, Marija Bubalo, Radomir Milović, Stevo Matijević, Marko Magić, Igor Đorđević
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2014-12-01
Series:Acta Veterinaria
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/acve-2014-0045
_version_ 1818837045453258752
author Zoran Lazić
Marija Bubalo
Radomir Milović
Stevo Matijević
Marko Magić
Igor Đorđević
author_facet Zoran Lazić
Marija Bubalo
Radomir Milović
Stevo Matijević
Marko Magić
Igor Đorđević
author_sort Zoran Lazić
collection DOAJ
description The properties of membranes for guided bone regeneration have been described by a number of authors. These involve biocompatibility, appropriate barrier features (mechanical prevention of soft tissue proliferation), tissue integration, immunologic neutrality, preservation of the space for new alveolar bone, and simplicity of application. Such membrane must hold out against the masticatory forces and tissue tension of the fl ap, and prevent the collapse of soft tissues and wound space reduction. The property of integration into the tissue guarantees wound stabilization and inhibits epithelial migration. The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the infl uence of human resorbable demineralized membrane (RHDM) and bovine resorbable demineralized membrane (RBDM) on bone regeneration. The experiment, approved by the Ethical Committee, was performed on six dogs and conducted into three phases. Bone defects were created in all six dogs on the left side of the mandible, 8 weeks after extraction of the second, third and fourth premolar. One defect was covered with 200 μm thick RHDM, one with 200 μm thick RBDM, and the third defect was left empty (control defect). The pathohistological analysis was done two, four and six months after the surgery. In the third phase samples of bone tissue were taken and subjected to patohistological analysis. In all six dogs the defects treated with RHDM 200μm thick showed a higher level of bone regeneration in comparison with the defect treated with RBDM 200 μm thick and especially with the control defect. Our results demonstrated that the human membrane showed the least soft tissue ingrowth and promoted better bone formation at 6 months compared with a bovine one.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T03:16:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-df2e30fd4f104759b85820913ef2f618
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1820-7448
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T03:16:15Z
publishDate 2014-12-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Acta Veterinaria
spelling doaj.art-df2e30fd4f104759b85820913ef2f6182022-12-21T20:37:53ZengSciendoActa Veterinaria1820-74482014-12-0164447749210.2478/acve-2014-0045Comparison of Resorbable Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration of Human and Bovine OriginZoran Lazić0Marija Bubalo1Radomir Milović2Stevo Matijević3Marko Magić4Igor Đorđević5Clinic for Dentistry Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, SerbiaClinic for Dentistry Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, SerbiaClinic for Dentistry Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, SerbiaClinic for Dentistry Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, SerbiaClinic for Dentistry Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, SerbiaFaculty of Dentistry, Belgrade, SerbiaThe properties of membranes for guided bone regeneration have been described by a number of authors. These involve biocompatibility, appropriate barrier features (mechanical prevention of soft tissue proliferation), tissue integration, immunologic neutrality, preservation of the space for new alveolar bone, and simplicity of application. Such membrane must hold out against the masticatory forces and tissue tension of the fl ap, and prevent the collapse of soft tissues and wound space reduction. The property of integration into the tissue guarantees wound stabilization and inhibits epithelial migration. The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the infl uence of human resorbable demineralized membrane (RHDM) and bovine resorbable demineralized membrane (RBDM) on bone regeneration. The experiment, approved by the Ethical Committee, was performed on six dogs and conducted into three phases. Bone defects were created in all six dogs on the left side of the mandible, 8 weeks after extraction of the second, third and fourth premolar. One defect was covered with 200 μm thick RHDM, one with 200 μm thick RBDM, and the third defect was left empty (control defect). The pathohistological analysis was done two, four and six months after the surgery. In the third phase samples of bone tissue were taken and subjected to patohistological analysis. In all six dogs the defects treated with RHDM 200μm thick showed a higher level of bone regeneration in comparison with the defect treated with RBDM 200 μm thick and especially with the control defect. Our results demonstrated that the human membrane showed the least soft tissue ingrowth and promoted better bone formation at 6 months compared with a bovine one.https://doi.org/10.2478/acve-2014-0045bovine resorbable membranedog mandible defectguided bone regenerationhuman resorbable membranemembrane thickness
spellingShingle Zoran Lazić
Marija Bubalo
Radomir Milović
Stevo Matijević
Marko Magić
Igor Đorđević
Comparison of Resorbable Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration of Human and Bovine Origin
Acta Veterinaria
bovine resorbable membrane
dog mandible defect
guided bone regeneration
human resorbable membrane
membrane thickness
title Comparison of Resorbable Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration of Human and Bovine Origin
title_full Comparison of Resorbable Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration of Human and Bovine Origin
title_fullStr Comparison of Resorbable Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration of Human and Bovine Origin
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Resorbable Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration of Human and Bovine Origin
title_short Comparison of Resorbable Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration of Human and Bovine Origin
title_sort comparison of resorbable membranes for guided bone regeneration of human and bovine origin
topic bovine resorbable membrane
dog mandible defect
guided bone regeneration
human resorbable membrane
membrane thickness
url https://doi.org/10.2478/acve-2014-0045
work_keys_str_mv AT zoranlazic comparisonofresorbablemembranesforguidedboneregenerationofhumanandbovineorigin
AT marijabubalo comparisonofresorbablemembranesforguidedboneregenerationofhumanandbovineorigin
AT radomirmilovic comparisonofresorbablemembranesforguidedboneregenerationofhumanandbovineorigin
AT stevomatijevic comparisonofresorbablemembranesforguidedboneregenerationofhumanandbovineorigin
AT markomagic comparisonofresorbablemembranesforguidedboneregenerationofhumanandbovineorigin
AT igorđorđevic comparisonofresorbablemembranesforguidedboneregenerationofhumanandbovineorigin