A Simple Approach for Counting CD4<sup>+</sup> T Cells Based on a Combination of Magnetic Activated Cell Sorting and Automated Cell Counting Methods

Frequent tests for CD4<sup>+</sup> T cell counting are important for the treatment of patients with immune deficiency; however, the routinely used fluorescence-activated cell-sorting (FACS) gold standard is costly and the equipment is only available in central hospitals. In this study, w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ngoc Duc Vo, Anh Thi Van Nguyen, Hoi Thi Le, Nam Hoang Nguyen, Huong Thi Thu Pham
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-10-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/21/9786
Description
Summary:Frequent tests for CD4<sup>+</sup> T cell counting are important for the treatment of patients with immune deficiency; however, the routinely used fluorescence-activated cell-sorting (FACS) gold standard is costly and the equipment is only available in central hospitals. In this study, we developed an alternative simple approach (shortly named as the MACS-Countess system) for CD4<sup>+</sup> T cell counting by coupling magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) to separate CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells from blood, followed by counting the separated cells using Countess<sup>TM</sup>, an automated cell-counting system. Using the cell counting protocol, 25 µL anti-CD4 conjugated magnetic nanoparticles (NP-CD4, BD Bioscience) were optimized for separating CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells from 50 µL of blood in PBS using a Dynamag<sup>TM</sup>-2 magnet, followed by the introduction of 10 µL separated cells into a Countess<sup>TM</sup> chamber slide for automated counting of CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells. To evaluate the reliability of the developed method, 48 blood samples with CD4<sup>+</sup> T cell concentrations ranging from 105 to 980 cells/µL were analyzed using both MACS-Countess and FACS. Compared with FACS, MACS-Countess had a mean bias of 3.5% with a limit of agreement (LoA) ranging from −36.4% to 43.3%, which is close to the reliability of the commercial product, PIMA analyzer (Alere), reported previously (mean bias 0.2%; LoA ranging from −42% to 42%, FACS as reference). Further, the MACS-Countess system requires very simple instruments, including only a magnet and an automated cell counter, which are affordable for almost every lab located in a limited resource region.
ISSN:2076-3417