Perfect Density Models Cannot Guarantee Anomaly Detection

Thanks to the tractability of their likelihood, several deep generative models show promise for seemingly straightforward but important applications like anomaly detection, uncertainty estimation, and active learning. However, the likelihood values empirically attributed to anomalies conflict with t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charline Le Lan, Laurent Dinh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-12-01
Series:Entropy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/23/12/1690
_version_ 1797504941666861056
author Charline Le Lan
Laurent Dinh
author_facet Charline Le Lan
Laurent Dinh
author_sort Charline Le Lan
collection DOAJ
description Thanks to the tractability of their likelihood, several deep generative models show promise for seemingly straightforward but important applications like anomaly detection, uncertainty estimation, and active learning. However, the likelihood values empirically attributed to anomalies conflict with the expectations these proposed applications suggest. In this paper, we take a closer look at the behavior of distribution densities through the lens of reparametrization and show that these quantities carry less meaningful information than previously thought, beyond estimation issues or the curse of dimensionality. We conclude that the use of these likelihoods for anomaly detection relies on strong and implicit hypotheses, and highlight the necessity of explicitly formulating these assumptions for reliable anomaly detection.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T04:11:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-df4fa65d83ad4075a5a490bf765c6c86
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1099-4300
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T04:11:34Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Entropy
spelling doaj.art-df4fa65d83ad4075a5a490bf765c6c862023-11-23T08:11:44ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002021-12-012312169010.3390/e23121690Perfect Density Models Cannot Guarantee Anomaly DetectionCharline Le Lan0Laurent Dinh1Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3LB, UKGoogle Research, Montreal, QC H3B 2Y5, CanadaThanks to the tractability of their likelihood, several deep generative models show promise for seemingly straightforward but important applications like anomaly detection, uncertainty estimation, and active learning. However, the likelihood values empirically attributed to anomalies conflict with the expectations these proposed applications suggest. In this paper, we take a closer look at the behavior of distribution densities through the lens of reparametrization and show that these quantities carry less meaningful information than previously thought, beyond estimation issues or the curse of dimensionality. We conclude that the use of these likelihoods for anomaly detection relies on strong and implicit hypotheses, and highlight the necessity of explicitly formulating these assumptions for reliable anomaly detection.https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/23/12/1690deep generative modelingprobabilistic modelinganomaly detection
spellingShingle Charline Le Lan
Laurent Dinh
Perfect Density Models Cannot Guarantee Anomaly Detection
Entropy
deep generative modeling
probabilistic modeling
anomaly detection
title Perfect Density Models Cannot Guarantee Anomaly Detection
title_full Perfect Density Models Cannot Guarantee Anomaly Detection
title_fullStr Perfect Density Models Cannot Guarantee Anomaly Detection
title_full_unstemmed Perfect Density Models Cannot Guarantee Anomaly Detection
title_short Perfect Density Models Cannot Guarantee Anomaly Detection
title_sort perfect density models cannot guarantee anomaly detection
topic deep generative modeling
probabilistic modeling
anomaly detection
url https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/23/12/1690
work_keys_str_mv AT charlinelelan perfectdensitymodelscannotguaranteeanomalydetection
AT laurentdinh perfectdensitymodelscannotguaranteeanomalydetection