Psychiatric evaluation of intellectually disabled offenders referred to the Free State Psychiatric Complex, 1993-2003

Background. Increased crime is a problem in South Africaand complications arise when the accused is intellectuallydisabled. The accountability and fitness to stand trial ofsuch individuals is an important facet that needs to bemanaged by the judicial and health systems.Objective. To analyse the acco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F J W Calitz, P H J J van Rensburg, P P de Jager, M L Olander, L Thomas, R Venter, G A Wessels, G Joubert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2007-12-01
Series:South African Journal of Psychiatry
Online Access:http://www.sajp.org.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/37
_version_ 1818535027692011520
author F J W Calitz
P H J J van Rensburg
P P de Jager
M L Olander
L Thomas
R Venter
G A Wessels
G Joubert
author_facet F J W Calitz
P H J J van Rensburg
P P de Jager
M L Olander
L Thomas
R Venter
G A Wessels
G Joubert
author_sort F J W Calitz
collection DOAJ
description Background. Increased crime is a problem in South Africaand complications arise when the accused is intellectuallydisabled. The accountability and fitness to stand trial ofsuch individuals is an important facet that needs to bemanaged by the judicial and health systems.Objective. To analyse the accountability and triability ofintellectually disabled people awaiting trial referred tothe Free State Psychiatric Complex (FSPC) from 1993 to2003 according to Sections 77 and 78 of the CriminalProcedures Act (Act 51 of 1977).Method. A retrospective study was conducted. The studypopulation consisted of 80 intellectually disabled peopleawaiting trial in the Free State, referred to the FSPC. Thereason for referral was the possibility that they were nottriable or accountable. A data form was compiled totransfer the relevant information from the patients’ clinicalfiles.Results. The study found that the majority of subjectswere male (96.3%), unmarried (76.3%) and unemployed(63.8%). The median age was 27 years. A relativelyhigh percentage (49%) had received some schoolingand 16% had attended a special school. Most (32%)were referred from the Bloemfontein area and 68% werereferred from the remainder of the Free State and otherareas. The majority were referred according to Sections77 and 78. The highest number of the offences were ofa sexual nature (78%). Of the subjects, 62 (62.5%) werediagnosed as having mild mental retardation, while 16%were diagnosed as having moderate mental retardation.A total of 71 (71.25%) were found to be untriable andunaccountable.Conclusion. Triability and accountability are not onlyreflected by IQ score, but also involve the accused’sunderstanding of his/her environment, his/her speechand language proficiency, level of education, reasoningability and the manner in which the crime was committed.It is important to note that having an IQ of 70 or less doesnot automatically mean that the accused is unfit to standtrial or is not accountable. It is possible for an intellectuallydisabled person to be triable, accountable or diminishedaccountable.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T18:19:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-df53770697944039a2e3cbec3bd0ddf5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1608-9685
2078-6786
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T18:19:21Z
publishDate 2007-12-01
publisher AOSIS
record_format Article
series South African Journal of Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-df53770697944039a2e3cbec3bd0ddf52022-12-22T00:55:20ZengAOSISSouth African Journal of Psychiatry1608-96852078-67862007-12-0113410.4102/sajpsychiatry.v13i4.37212Psychiatric evaluation of intellectually disabled offenders referred to the Free State Psychiatric Complex, 1993-2003F J W CalitzP H J J van RensburgP P de JagerM L OlanderL ThomasR VenterG A WesselsG JoubertBackground. Increased crime is a problem in South Africaand complications arise when the accused is intellectuallydisabled. The accountability and fitness to stand trial ofsuch individuals is an important facet that needs to bemanaged by the judicial and health systems.Objective. To analyse the accountability and triability ofintellectually disabled people awaiting trial referred tothe Free State Psychiatric Complex (FSPC) from 1993 to2003 according to Sections 77 and 78 of the CriminalProcedures Act (Act 51 of 1977).Method. A retrospective study was conducted. The studypopulation consisted of 80 intellectually disabled peopleawaiting trial in the Free State, referred to the FSPC. Thereason for referral was the possibility that they were nottriable or accountable. A data form was compiled totransfer the relevant information from the patients’ clinicalfiles.Results. The study found that the majority of subjectswere male (96.3%), unmarried (76.3%) and unemployed(63.8%). The median age was 27 years. A relativelyhigh percentage (49%) had received some schoolingand 16% had attended a special school. Most (32%)were referred from the Bloemfontein area and 68% werereferred from the remainder of the Free State and otherareas. The majority were referred according to Sections77 and 78. The highest number of the offences were ofa sexual nature (78%). Of the subjects, 62 (62.5%) werediagnosed as having mild mental retardation, while 16%were diagnosed as having moderate mental retardation.A total of 71 (71.25%) were found to be untriable andunaccountable.Conclusion. Triability and accountability are not onlyreflected by IQ score, but also involve the accused’sunderstanding of his/her environment, his/her speechand language proficiency, level of education, reasoningability and the manner in which the crime was committed.It is important to note that having an IQ of 70 or less doesnot automatically mean that the accused is unfit to standtrial or is not accountable. It is possible for an intellectuallydisabled person to be triable, accountable or diminishedaccountable.http://www.sajp.org.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/37
spellingShingle F J W Calitz
P H J J van Rensburg
P P de Jager
M L Olander
L Thomas
R Venter
G A Wessels
G Joubert
Psychiatric evaluation of intellectually disabled offenders referred to the Free State Psychiatric Complex, 1993-2003
South African Journal of Psychiatry
title Psychiatric evaluation of intellectually disabled offenders referred to the Free State Psychiatric Complex, 1993-2003
title_full Psychiatric evaluation of intellectually disabled offenders referred to the Free State Psychiatric Complex, 1993-2003
title_fullStr Psychiatric evaluation of intellectually disabled offenders referred to the Free State Psychiatric Complex, 1993-2003
title_full_unstemmed Psychiatric evaluation of intellectually disabled offenders referred to the Free State Psychiatric Complex, 1993-2003
title_short Psychiatric evaluation of intellectually disabled offenders referred to the Free State Psychiatric Complex, 1993-2003
title_sort psychiatric evaluation of intellectually disabled offenders referred to the free state psychiatric complex 1993 2003
url http://www.sajp.org.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/37
work_keys_str_mv AT fjwcalitz psychiatricevaluationofintellectuallydisabledoffendersreferredtothefreestatepsychiatriccomplex19932003
AT phjjvanrensburg psychiatricevaluationofintellectuallydisabledoffendersreferredtothefreestatepsychiatriccomplex19932003
AT ppdejager psychiatricevaluationofintellectuallydisabledoffendersreferredtothefreestatepsychiatriccomplex19932003
AT mlolander psychiatricevaluationofintellectuallydisabledoffendersreferredtothefreestatepsychiatriccomplex19932003
AT lthomas psychiatricevaluationofintellectuallydisabledoffendersreferredtothefreestatepsychiatriccomplex19932003
AT rventer psychiatricevaluationofintellectuallydisabledoffendersreferredtothefreestatepsychiatriccomplex19932003
AT gawessels psychiatricevaluationofintellectuallydisabledoffendersreferredtothefreestatepsychiatriccomplex19932003
AT gjoubert psychiatricevaluationofintellectuallydisabledoffendersreferredtothefreestatepsychiatriccomplex19932003